“Les Malcontents” and the Monarchomach Treatises: The Aristocratic Justification of Revolt and the Ideology of Popular Sovereignty in 1570s France

Intended to destroy the aristocratic leadership of the Huguenots, the massacre of St. Bartholomew galvanized instead the opposition to a monarchy seen now not only as tyrannical, but also treacherous. The Huguenots started exploring various ways to check and even depose a hostile monarch, in the so-called monarchomach treatises. But the massacre also led to the formation of a faction of moderate Catholic aristocrats, “les malcontents”, who cooperated with the Huguenots against a monarchy that, in their opinion, had committed a major breach of trust. Both the Huguenots and the malcontents proposed their own constitutional theories, aimed at limiting the power of the monarchy: the former argued in favor of a form of popular sovereignty, which would have turned the king into something akin to a first magistrate of his kingdom, while the latter put forward ideas that preserved the king as the undisputable head of the political pyramid, but argued in favor of the right to revolt, in the name of the same king, for the sake of the “public good”. The aim of this paper is to examine both the differences and the common ground between these two political models, as they are reflected in the propaganda issued by the Huguenots and the leaders of the malcontents during the 1570s.