Hydrophobic folding units at protein‐protein interfaces: Implications to protein folding and to protein‐protein association

AbstractA hydrophobic folding unit cutting algorithm, originally developed for dissecting single‐chain proteins, has been applied to a dataset of dissimilar two‐chain protein‐protein interfaces. Rather than consider each individual chain separately, the two‐chain complex has been treated as a single chain. The two‐chain parsing results presented in this work show hydrophobicity to be a critical attribute of two‐state versus three‐state protein‐protein complexes. The hydrophobic folding units at the interfaces of two‐state complexes suggest that the cooperative nature of the two‐chain protein folding is the outcome of the hydrophobic effect, similar to its being the driving force in a single‐chain folding. In analogy to the protein‐folding process, the two‐chain, two‐state model complex may correspond to the formation of compact, hydrophobic nuclei. On the other hand, the three‐state model complex involves binding of already folded monomers, similar to the association of the hydrophobic folding units within a single chain. The similarity between folding entities in protein cores and in two‐state protein‐protein interfaces, despite the absence of some chain connectivities in the latter, indicates that chain linkage does not necessarily affect the native conformation. This further substantiates the notion that tertiary, non‐local interactions play a critical role in protein folding. These compact, hydrophobic, two‐chain folding units, derived from structurally dissimilar protein‐protein interfaces, provide a rich set of data useful in investigations of the role played by chain connectivity and by tertiary interactions in studies of binding and of folding. Since they are composed of non‐contiguous pieces of protein backbones, they may also aid in defining folding nuclei.