Javascript must be enabled to continue!
9.F. Workshop: Rapid evidence synthesis to inform the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) is an independent statutory authority in Ireland. Since March 2020, HIQA has been conducting evidence syntheses to support decision-making by the Irish National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET). This work has informed guidance developed by national and international agencies such as the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Newfoundland and Labrador Center for Applied Health Research, Sciensano (Belgium), Alberta Health Services and Sante Publique France. The HIQA COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team draws on a broad range of evidence with expert clinical and public health input from HIQA's COVID-19 Expert Advisory Group, and produces a range of outputs to best suit the evidence needs of decision-makers. Across the world, agencies have had to adapt rapidly to provide up-to-date COVID-19 research evidence to decision-makers. Similarly, evidence users, including the public, have had to assimilate information on COVID-19 generated by such agencies. Significant challenges exist given the speed at which the evidence base is evolving on COVID-19, its sometimes conflicting nature and often poor quality, and the subsequent influence of its dissemination on policy and on individual behaviour and risk perceptions. This workshop describes the work of HIQA's COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team in its role to support the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this workshop is to share learnings on the structure, methodological approaches, and impact of a COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team. The presenters who all work on, or are affiliated with HIQA's COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team, will discuss a range of topics including the establishment of the team, the conduct of rapid evidence syntheses, and the impact and media coverage of the outputs. The presenters will each present their topic in turn and will allow ample time for engagement, and will use e-voting systems, to enable shared learning. The objectives for this workshop are to:
Describe the establishment and organisation of a COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team Provide case examples of completed rapid evidence syntheses Examine the media coverage of selected outputs Present the findings of a an in-action evaluation Share learnings on the organisation of evidence synthesis teams, the conduct of rapid evidence syntheses and the subsequent communication of findings.
As the pandemic moves into a new phase it is important that agencies involved in conducting, and using the findings of, evidence syntheses reflect on processes and impact to-date. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 evidence synthesis experience can inform the development of future evidence synthesis approaches as well as support future pandemic preparedness. There is a need to remain flexible and to innovate, and this workshop presents an ideal opportunity for a European public health audience to share experiences and ideas.
Key messages
The challenges and opportunities associated with conducting rapid evidence synthesis during a pandemic will be explored. This workshop will provide a space to share learnings and ideas.
Title: 9.F. Workshop: Rapid evidence synthesis to inform the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland
Description:
Abstract
The Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) is an independent statutory authority in Ireland.
Since March 2020, HIQA has been conducting evidence syntheses to support decision-making by the Irish National Public Health Emergency Team (NPHET).
This work has informed guidance developed by national and international agencies such as the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Newfoundland and Labrador Center for Applied Health Research, Sciensano (Belgium), Alberta Health Services and Sante Publique France.
The HIQA COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team draws on a broad range of evidence with expert clinical and public health input from HIQA's COVID-19 Expert Advisory Group, and produces a range of outputs to best suit the evidence needs of decision-makers.
Across the world, agencies have had to adapt rapidly to provide up-to-date COVID-19 research evidence to decision-makers.
Similarly, evidence users, including the public, have had to assimilate information on COVID-19 generated by such agencies.
Significant challenges exist given the speed at which the evidence base is evolving on COVID-19, its sometimes conflicting nature and often poor quality, and the subsequent influence of its dissemination on policy and on individual behaviour and risk perceptions.
This workshop describes the work of HIQA's COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team in its role to support the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The aim of this workshop is to share learnings on the structure, methodological approaches, and impact of a COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team.
The presenters who all work on, or are affiliated with HIQA's COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team, will discuss a range of topics including the establishment of the team, the conduct of rapid evidence syntheses, and the impact and media coverage of the outputs.
The presenters will each present their topic in turn and will allow ample time for engagement, and will use e-voting systems, to enable shared learning.
The objectives for this workshop are to:
Describe the establishment and organisation of a COVID-19 Evidence Synthesis Team Provide case examples of completed rapid evidence syntheses Examine the media coverage of selected outputs Present the findings of a an in-action evaluation Share learnings on the organisation of evidence synthesis teams, the conduct of rapid evidence syntheses and the subsequent communication of findings.
As the pandemic moves into a new phase it is important that agencies involved in conducting, and using the findings of, evidence syntheses reflect on processes and impact to-date.
Lessons learned from the COVID-19 evidence synthesis experience can inform the development of future evidence synthesis approaches as well as support future pandemic preparedness.
There is a need to remain flexible and to innovate, and this workshop presents an ideal opportunity for a European public health audience to share experiences and ideas.
Key messages
The challenges and opportunities associated with conducting rapid evidence synthesis during a pandemic will be explored.
This workshop will provide a space to share learnings and ideas.
Related Results
Drivers of Income Inequality in Ireland and Northern Ireland
Drivers of Income Inequality in Ireland and Northern Ireland
The distribution of income differs in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Historically, Northern Ireland has been marked by lower levels of income and lower income inequality. The Gini c...
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
Use of Personal Protective Equipment in General Practice and Ambulance settings: a rapid review
AbstractThe use of personal protective equipment (PPE) is a cornerstone of infection prevention and control guidelines and was of increased importance during the COVID-19 pandemic....
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
Re Application by the Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland); Reference by Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland Pursuant to Paragraph 33 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (Abortion) (Northern Ireland)
531Human rights — Rights of women in Northern Ireland — Pregnant women and girls — Autonomy and bodily integrity — Right to respect for private and family life — Rights of persons ...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
1.B. Workshop: Adaptations in a time of crisis – public health practice in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic
1.B. Workshop: Adaptations in a time of crisis – public health practice in Sweden during the COVID-19 pandemic
Abstract
Background
The Public Health Agency of Sweden has assessed the consequences of the COVID-19-pandemic in relation to the...
COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION
COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION
Dear Editor,
In December 2019, a new virus which is known as SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) was identified. In a short period, this virus spread rapidly and caused significant morbidities a...
Abstract P29: Pre-COVID-19 pandemic vs. post-COVID-19 pandemic: Sustained participation of minorities in research in a CAP accredited biorepository in UC San Diego, California
Abstract P29: Pre-COVID-19 pandemic vs. post-COVID-19 pandemic: Sustained participation of minorities in research in a CAP accredited biorepository in UC San Diego, California
Abstract
Background: The UC San Diego (UCSD) Moores Cancer Center Biorepository (BR) is a College of American Pathologists (CAP)-accredited core providing a full arr...


