Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Communicative Identity in the Eighteenth Century; Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim's Epistolary Network and the Cult of Friendship

View through CrossRef
In recent years the field of ‘life writing’ has been shaped by critical approaches that have abandoned traditional notions of the singular, self-governing individual in favor of a multiple and processual concept of the subject which understands the self as socially determined. A key role is played by an engagement with the technological and medial requirements – the material basis – of the subject’s construction. In contributing to this debate, this article looks at a configuration that, while it has numerous structural analogies to the present, is historically situated in the eighteenth century. Using the example of the epistolary network around the German Enlightenment figure Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim (1719–1803), I will argue that at one of the decisive turning points in the formation of the modern concept of the subject there was a form of medial communication which stood at odds to the idea of a unified and autonomous self. Through the relationship created between author and addressee, the letter constructed changing versions of the self that made the success of communication dependent on the play between textual ambiguities and the imagination. At the same time the article examines the role of the visual image as a substitute for the other in epistolary communication. Under the guiding concept of ‘friendship’ a network of text and identity production occurring in parallel is formed. Such a network is not solely based on the principle of individual autonomy but also on collective recognition. This article was submitted on July 1st 2014 and published on December 5th 2014.
Title: Communicative Identity in the Eighteenth Century; Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim's Epistolary Network and the Cult of Friendship
Description:
In recent years the field of ‘life writing’ has been shaped by critical approaches that have abandoned traditional notions of the singular, self-governing individual in favor of a multiple and processual concept of the subject which understands the self as socially determined.
A key role is played by an engagement with the technological and medial requirements – the material basis – of the subject’s construction.
In contributing to this debate, this article looks at a configuration that, while it has numerous structural analogies to the present, is historically situated in the eighteenth century.
Using the example of the epistolary network around the German Enlightenment figure Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim (1719–1803), I will argue that at one of the decisive turning points in the formation of the modern concept of the subject there was a form of medial communication which stood at odds to the idea of a unified and autonomous self.
Through the relationship created between author and addressee, the letter constructed changing versions of the self that made the success of communication dependent on the play between textual ambiguities and the imagination.
At the same time the article examines the role of the visual image as a substitute for the other in epistolary communication.
Under the guiding concept of ‘friendship’ a network of text and identity production occurring in parallel is formed.
Such a network is not solely based on the principle of individual autonomy but also on collective recognition.
 This article was submitted on July 1st 2014 and published on December 5th 2014.

Related Results

Intercultural Friendships
Intercultural Friendships
Intercultural friendship is known to reduce prejudice and foster international goodwill. Yet, intercultural friendship is not commonplace due to a complex interplay of factors that...
Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim, Ausgewählte Werke. Hg. von Walter Hettche. 2003
Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim, Ausgewählte Werke. Hg. von Walter Hettche. 2003
Im Jahre 1803 verlor der deutsche Parnaß drei seiner namhaften Mitglieder: Friedrich Gottlieb Klopstock, Johann Gottfried Herder und Johann Wilhelm Ludwig Gleim. Zählen Klopstock u...
Nature Transformed: English Landscape Gardens and <i>Theatrum Mundi</i>
Nature Transformed: English Landscape Gardens and <i>Theatrum Mundi</i>
IntroductionThe European will to modify the natural world emerged through English landscape design during the eighteenth century. Released from the neo-classical aesthetic dichotom...
STUDENTS COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION: PEDAGOGICAL ASPECT
STUDENTS COMMUNICATIVE CULTURE IN INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION: PEDAGOGICAL ASPECT
The pedagogical aspect of students’ communicative culture in the conditions of international communication is investigated in the paper. The interpretation of the essence of the ca...
The early communicative skills among a sample of Egyptian infants and toddlers
The early communicative skills among a sample of Egyptian infants and toddlers
AbstractBackgroundThe development of early communicative skills has always been an area of interest in the medical field. Although the assessment of early communicative skills and ...
Epistolary communication: the semiotic dimension
Epistolary communication: the semiotic dimension
The article presents an original approach to the analysis of epistolary communication of the Ukrainian intelligentsia of the late XIX - early XX centuries from the standpoint of se...
FRIENDSHIP QUALITY AND SUBJECTIVE VITALITY AMONG ADOLESCENTS: SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AS MODERATOR
FRIENDSHIP QUALITY AND SUBJECTIVE VITALITY AMONG ADOLESCENTS: SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AS MODERATOR
Adolescence is a critical developmental period during which social relationships, particularly friendship quality, play a vital role in shaping subjective well-being, with socioeco...
Subject’s Roles in the Non-Cooperative Type of Communicative Situation “Talk of Friends”
Subject’s Roles in the Non-Cooperative Type of Communicative Situation “Talk of Friends”
Communicative situation “Talk of Friends” is the only one to represent discourse of friendship. This presupposes that discourse subject’s role is that of FRIEND in its different va...

Back to Top