Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Tobacco industry strategy to undermine tobacco control in Finland

View through CrossRef
Objective:To identify and explain tobacco industry strategy in undermining tobacco control measures in Finland and results of these interferences in tobacco policy development during the 1980s and early 1990s.Methods:Tobacco industry documents, which have been publicly available on the internet as a result of litigation in the USA, were analysed. Documents were sought by Finland and by names of organisations and tobacco control activists. Documents were accessed and assessed between September 2000 and November 2002. Tactics of the tobacco industry activities were categorised as presented by Saloojee and Dagli.Results:The international tobacco companies utilised similar strategies in Finland as in other industrial markets to fight tobacco control and legislation, the health advocacy movement, and litigation. These activities slowed down the development and implementation of the Tobacco Act in Finland. However, despite the extensive pressure, the industry was not able to prevent the most progressive tobacco legislation in Europe from being passed and coming into force in Finland in 1977 and in 1995.Conclusion:Denying the health hazards caused by tobacco—despite indisputable scientific evidence—decreased the credibility of the tobacco industry. Strategy of denial was falsely chosen, as health advocacy groups were active both in society and the parliamentary system. The strong influence of the tobacco industry may have in fact increased the visibility of tobacco control in Finland as the litigation process was also drawing attention to negative health effects of tobacco. Therefore the tobacco industry did not manage to convince public opinion. However, the tobacco industry did obtain experience in Finland in how to object to tobacco control measures.
Title: Tobacco industry strategy to undermine tobacco control in Finland
Description:
Objective:To identify and explain tobacco industry strategy in undermining tobacco control measures in Finland and results of these interferences in tobacco policy development during the 1980s and early 1990s.
Methods:Tobacco industry documents, which have been publicly available on the internet as a result of litigation in the USA, were analysed.
Documents were sought by Finland and by names of organisations and tobacco control activists.
Documents were accessed and assessed between September 2000 and November 2002.
Tactics of the tobacco industry activities were categorised as presented by Saloojee and Dagli.
Results:The international tobacco companies utilised similar strategies in Finland as in other industrial markets to fight tobacco control and legislation, the health advocacy movement, and litigation.
These activities slowed down the development and implementation of the Tobacco Act in Finland.
However, despite the extensive pressure, the industry was not able to prevent the most progressive tobacco legislation in Europe from being passed and coming into force in Finland in 1977 and in 1995.
Conclusion:Denying the health hazards caused by tobacco—despite indisputable scientific evidence—decreased the credibility of the tobacco industry.
Strategy of denial was falsely chosen, as health advocacy groups were active both in society and the parliamentary system.
The strong influence of the tobacco industry may have in fact increased the visibility of tobacco control in Finland as the litigation process was also drawing attention to negative health effects of tobacco.
Therefore the tobacco industry did not manage to convince public opinion.
However, the tobacco industry did obtain experience in Finland in how to object to tobacco control measures.

Related Results

Are Farmers Willing to Substitute Tobacco Cultivation? Evidence From Lichuan City, China
Are Farmers Willing to Substitute Tobacco Cultivation? Evidence From Lichuan City, China
Abstract Introduction Tobacco crop substitution is a critical element in implementing comprehensive tobacco control policies. Un...
Similarity in the microbial community structure of tobacco from geographically similar regions
Similarity in the microbial community structure of tobacco from geographically similar regions
Abstract To investigate the structural and functional similarities of microbial communities in burnt-sweetness alcoholized tobacco as a function of distance from the equato...
Heated tobacco products: another tobacco industry global strategy to slow progress in tobacco control
Heated tobacco products: another tobacco industry global strategy to slow progress in tobacco control
There has been a global decline in tobacco consumption that, if continued, will negatively impact the tobacco industry’s profits. This decline led the industry to invent and market...
Mapping the African Tobacco Control Network
Mapping the African Tobacco Control Network
ABSTRACT Background To understand the state of tobacco control efforts across Africa, a first-ever survey was implemented to as...
Tobacco Control Policy Based on Environmental Protection Law
Tobacco Control Policy Based on Environmental Protection Law
Objectives: Based on the environmental protection law, this paper analyzes our current tobacco control policy and studies the effectiveness of the follow-up policy. Methods: This p...
Tobacco Quitline toll-free number on tobacco packets in India: An analysis on outcome
Tobacco Quitline toll-free number on tobacco packets in India: An analysis on outcome
On 1 September 2018, 2 year later the launch of National Tobacco Quitline Services (NTQLS), new health warnings on tobacco products packets consisting of NTQLS toll-free number cam...
Coordination Between Tobacco Resource Development and Regional Economy
Coordination Between Tobacco Resource Development and Regional Economy
Objectives: This paper studies the relationship between the development of tobacco resources and the coordination of regional economy under the background of tobacco monopoly. Meth...

Back to Top