Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Development of the Performer's Role in Karlheinz Stockhausen's Piano Works
View through CrossRef
I have had the enormous privilege to meet the composer Karlheinz Stockhausen in 1982 at the Royal Conservatoire in The Hague. In the context of a month-long festival around his music I had, at the time being a first-year piano student, the opportunity to play his first four Klavierstücke for him, and this, apart from being a very inspiring experience for me, resulted in a close cooperation that lasted for 20 years. During these years I worked with him on all his piano works, including Mantra, and performed them many times on different occasions, almost always in the presence of Stockhausen himself. In 1997–1998 I recorded all the solo piano pieces on the composer’s label.
During those years I was asked quite a few times, either by someone from the audience or by students that I taught during masterclasses, if I expected these pieces to become part of the “canon of piano music” in fifty years from then.
At that time, being so involved in the piano pieces and probably not having the necessary distance to reflect on this question, I always answered the question in the affirmative.
So, it came as quite a shock to me when I started to notice a change by myself in relation to the piano pieces, at least to some of them. Normally, the more and longer I work on a piece the more I get attached to it, but now I started to realise that I got more and more detached from some of the pieces, up until the point that I didn’t want to play them anymore. However, other piano pieces remained very dear to me, and this up until today.
In short, it seemed that within 20 years I had unconsciously made my own ‘canon’ with regard to Stockhausen’s piano pieces.
What I find intriguing about this experience is to find out what the reason is for this enormous difference in appreciation for the works of one composer. Why am I sure that some piano works of Stockhausen will still be played many years from now while, in my opinion, other works will fade? Can I put a finger on differences between the pieces which can justify this? And if I can find something to justify this for Stockhausen’s Klavierstücke, could this also be valid for works by other composers?
Title: The Development of the Performer's Role in Karlheinz Stockhausen's Piano Works
Description:
I have had the enormous privilege to meet the composer Karlheinz Stockhausen in 1982 at the Royal Conservatoire in The Hague.
In the context of a month-long festival around his music I had, at the time being a first-year piano student, the opportunity to play his first four Klavierstücke for him, and this, apart from being a very inspiring experience for me, resulted in a close cooperation that lasted for 20 years.
During these years I worked with him on all his piano works, including Mantra, and performed them many times on different occasions, almost always in the presence of Stockhausen himself.
In 1997–1998 I recorded all the solo piano pieces on the composer’s label.
During those years I was asked quite a few times, either by someone from the audience or by students that I taught during masterclasses, if I expected these pieces to become part of the “canon of piano music” in fifty years from then.
At that time, being so involved in the piano pieces and probably not having the necessary distance to reflect on this question, I always answered the question in the affirmative.
So, it came as quite a shock to me when I started to notice a change by myself in relation to the piano pieces, at least to some of them.
Normally, the more and longer I work on a piece the more I get attached to it, but now I started to realise that I got more and more detached from some of the pieces, up until the point that I didn’t want to play them anymore.
However, other piano pieces remained very dear to me, and this up until today.
In short, it seemed that within 20 years I had unconsciously made my own ‘canon’ with regard to Stockhausen’s piano pieces.
What I find intriguing about this experience is to find out what the reason is for this enormous difference in appreciation for the works of one composer.
Why am I sure that some piano works of Stockhausen will still be played many years from now while, in my opinion, other works will fade? Can I put a finger on differences between the pieces which can justify this? And if I can find something to justify this for Stockhausen’s Klavierstücke, could this also be valid for works by other composers?.
Related Results
Robot Pemain Piano
Robot Pemain Piano
Piano adalah sebuah instrumen musik atau alat musik akustik yang berbunyi karena senar atau dawai yang dipukul oleh palu. Robot pemain piano merupakan suatu teknologi yang dapat be...
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Sounds Themselves: Intersections of Serialism and Musique Concrète in Karlheinz Stockhausen's "Elektronische Studie I"
Sounds Themselves: Intersections of Serialism and Musique Concrète in Karlheinz Stockhausen's "Elektronische Studie I"
In the summer of 1953, Karlheinz Stockhausen began composing his first piece of elektronische Musik at the Westdeutscher Rundfunk Studio for Electronic Music in Cologne. Up to that...
The Development of Online Lessons for Promoting Piano Playing Skills for Non-piano Playing Background Students
The Development of Online Lessons for Promoting Piano Playing Skills for Non-piano Playing Background Students
This study explores the process of developing online courses to improve the piano-playing skills of students with no piano-playing experience, designs and develops practical onlin...
Teaching Applied Piano Singing While Playing Based on Xindi Applied Piano Pedagogy: Taking Fujian Vocational College of Art as an Example
Teaching Applied Piano Singing While Playing Based on Xindi Applied Piano Pedagogy: Taking Fujian Vocational College of Art as an Example
As known to all, China has witnessed remarkable development in addition to its effective implementation of the “double reduction” policy. Under such circumstance, the piano has dra...
Clarisse Leite: perfil biográfico e listagem temática das obras para piano * Clarisse Leite: biographical profile and listing of piano works
Clarisse Leite: perfil biográfico e listagem temática das obras para piano * Clarisse Leite: biographical profile and listing of piano works
<p><strong>Resumo:</strong> O objetivo deste artigo é construir um perfil biográfico da compositora, pianista e professora de piano Clarisse Leite (1917-2003) e e...
Stockhausen, Karlheinz (1928–2007)
Stockhausen, Karlheinz (1928–2007)
For much of the 1950s and 1960s, the German composer Karlheinz Stockhausen was an absolutely seminal figure within the European avant-garde. By the mid-1950s, every new work of his...
Licht (1977-2003) de Karlheinz Stockhausen : aspects autobiographiques et intertextualité
Licht (1977-2003) de Karlheinz Stockhausen : aspects autobiographiques et intertextualité
Licht. Die sieben Tage der Woche (1977-2003) est un cycle constitué de sept opéras composés par Karlheinz Stockhausen (1928-2007) qui en a également conçu le livret. Le cycle a pou...

