Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Comparative Study Between-Small Bore and Large Bore Tubes for Therapeutic Pleural Drainage

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Pleural effusions due to various pulmonary and extra pulmonary causes are common clinical problems. Some pleural diseases require therapeutic pleurocentesis to decompress the pleural space like in malignant and benign pleural effusions, pyothorax, chylothorax, pneumothorax, complicated parapneumonic effusion and haemothoraces. Traditionally large bore tubes have been used with trocar or through blunt dissection. Nowadays small-bore catheters are gaining popularity, as they are less painful and believed to be equally efficacious as compared to large bore tubes. Aims & Objectives: To compare the success rate of small bore tubes with standard large bore chest tubes in therapeutic pleural drainage and to compare complications rate between small bore and large bore drains. Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at Department of Pulmonology of FPGMI, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, during one year (2015-2016). Material & Methods: Total 152 patients who required therapeutic evacuation of pleural space suffering from pneumothorax, empyema, parapneumonic and malignant effusion, were enrolled and underwent therapeutic drainage with small bore (< 20 F size) and large bore tubes (> 20 F size), randomized by lottery method. Results: The mean duration of drain placement for large bore drain was 7.9±3.8 days, which was significantly higher than small bore drains with a mean value of 3.0±1.6 days (p-value <0.001). The pain score was also quite high in large bore group with mean value 5.67±1.68 as compared to small bore 1.07±0.81(p-value<0.001). Similarly the mean bleeding during the procedure was significantly higher in large bore group as compared to small bore with mean values 11.9±7.8 and 0.1±0.2 ml respectively (p-value<0.001). The wound infection which is a significant complication was found only in large bore group with 14.5% cases as compared to none in small bore group (p-value 0.001). In large bore group surgery was required for 9(11.8%) cases while in small group there were 2(2.6%) patients referred for surgical intervention. Conclusion: Small bore thoracostomy drains are more effective than large bore tubes, for the treatment of pleural disorders requiring therapeutic drainage and they are associated with minimal pain and other complications.
Title: A Comparative Study Between-Small Bore and Large Bore Tubes for Therapeutic Pleural Drainage
Description:
Introduction: Pleural effusions due to various pulmonary and extra pulmonary causes are common clinical problems.
Some pleural diseases require therapeutic pleurocentesis to decompress the pleural space like in malignant and benign pleural effusions, pyothorax, chylothorax, pneumothorax, complicated parapneumonic effusion and haemothoraces.
Traditionally large bore tubes have been used with trocar or through blunt dissection.
Nowadays small-bore catheters are gaining popularity, as they are less painful and believed to be equally efficacious as compared to large bore tubes.
Aims & Objectives: To compare the success rate of small bore tubes with standard large bore chest tubes in therapeutic pleural drainage and to compare complications rate between small bore and large bore drains.
Place and duration of study: The study was conducted at Department of Pulmonology of FPGMI, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, during one year (2015-2016).
Material & Methods: Total 152 patients who required therapeutic evacuation of pleural space suffering from pneumothorax, empyema, parapneumonic and malignant effusion, were enrolled and underwent therapeutic drainage with small bore (< 20 F size) and large bore tubes (> 20 F size), randomized by lottery method.
Results: The mean duration of drain placement for large bore drain was 7.
9±3.
8 days, which was significantly higher than small bore drains with a mean value of 3.
0±1.
6 days (p-value <0.
001).
The pain score was also quite high in large bore group with mean value 5.
67±1.
68 as compared to small bore 1.
07±0.
81(p-value<0.
001).
Similarly the mean bleeding during the procedure was significantly higher in large bore group as compared to small bore with mean values 11.
9±7.
8 and 0.
1±0.
2 ml respectively (p-value<0.
001).
The wound infection which is a significant complication was found only in large bore group with 14.
5% cases as compared to none in small bore group (p-value 0.
001).
In large bore group surgery was required for 9(11.
8%) cases while in small group there were 2(2.
6%) patients referred for surgical intervention.
Conclusion: Small bore thoracostomy drains are more effective than large bore tubes, for the treatment of pleural disorders requiring therapeutic drainage and they are associated with minimal pain and other complications.

Related Results

Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Emerging Evidence of IgG4-Related Disease in Pericarditis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Immunoglobulin G4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a recently identified immune-mediated condition that is debilitating and often overlooked. While IgG4-RD has be...
Challenging Management of Postoperative Empyema: A Case Report with Literature Review
Challenging Management of Postoperative Empyema: A Case Report with Literature Review
Abstract Introduction: Pleural empyema is the collection of pus within the pleural cavity, typically arising as a complication of pneumonia, chest trauma, thoracic surgery, or bact...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Closed Pleural Biopsy is Still Useful in the Evaluation of Malignant Pleural Effusion
Closed Pleural Biopsy is Still Useful in the Evaluation of Malignant Pleural Effusion
ABSTRACT Background: Pleural fluid cytology for malignant cells is the easiest way to diagnose malignant pleural effusion with good sensitivity and specificity. With the ...
Role of Pleural Fluid “Cell Block” in Malignant Pleural Effusion
Role of Pleural Fluid “Cell Block” in Malignant Pleural Effusion
Background: Malignant pleural effusion missed routinely because of less diagnostic yield of conventional fluid cytology. ...
Definitive Diagnosis of Pleural Mesothelioma by Pleural Effusion Cytology: The MesoCyto Study
Definitive Diagnosis of Pleural Mesothelioma by Pleural Effusion Cytology: The MesoCyto Study
Abstract: Objective: We evaluated the possibility of diagnosing pleural mesothelioma (PM) through pleural effusion cytology in a multicentric prospective clinical trial (MesoCyto s...

Back to Top