Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Cupisnique-Chavín Religious Tradition in the Andes
View through CrossRef
Between 1400 and 500 bce, communities of the central Andes gradually adopted a visual culture dominated by images of predation in nature. Fangs became pervasive in images and were incorporated into beings that naturally lacked them, such as humans and birds. Composite beings, articulating parts of different predators, became popular, being depicted in multiple media. This shared visual culture resulted from the expansion, adoption, and local adaptation of the Cupisnique-Chavín religious tradition, one of the earliest and most clear cases of religious integration in the Andes.
The results of archaeological research in the 20th and 21st centuries have provided abundant information to approximate the ritual practices associated with this religious tradition. In the ceremonial centers—designed to accommodate large audiences—friezes and sculptures depict nonhuman beings with attributes of predators. During ceremonies, people feasted, played music, shared knowledge and experiences, and interacted with these images of supernatural characteristics. The middens surrounding these temples are filled with the remains of these activities, such as broken ceramics, food remains, ritual paraphernalia, and even friezes—discarded during work feasts dedicated to architectural renovation.
Traditionally, these images depicted in sculptures and friezes have been considered representations of a pantheon of divinities. These interpretations were based on theoretical assumptions about the relationship between sacred and profane, nature and culture, human and nonhuman, and personhood. In theoretical frameworks that reevaluate the ontology of Indigenous people of the Ancient Americas—such as adaptations of Viveiros de Castro’s multinatural perspectivism and theory on Andean huacas—these stone sculptures, buildings, and landscape features can be considered powerful nonhuman persons and important members of the communities.
These ancient Andean beings must have acquired power from their relationship with the community and local landscapes. This sets them apart from the view of omnipresent divinities in modern world religions. In a world where one’s knowledge is acquired through experiencing the world, a way to acquire new knowledge may have involved seeing the world through the eyes of other beings. In the Cupisnique-Chavín world, the most powerful and wise of these nonhuman entities may have been those stone beings with multispecies abilities housed in the temples. The institution of pilgrimage may have emerged because of the need to acquire new knowledge from these extraordinary beings believed to dwell throughout the central Andes.
While scholarly research is thriving in the first decades of the 21st century, there are obstacles in the way of sharing these results with the nonscholarly public. Involuntarily, the reconstruction of the ceremonial temples has created solemn and sterile images of these ancient ceremonial temples, very far from the archaeological description of the findings in these places. This creates a continuing gap between what is known about these Cupisnique-Chavín ritual practices—and the role of the nonhuman in them—and the perception of the public as to this tradition.
Title: The Cupisnique-Chavín Religious Tradition in the Andes
Description:
Between 1400 and 500 bce, communities of the central Andes gradually adopted a visual culture dominated by images of predation in nature.
Fangs became pervasive in images and were incorporated into beings that naturally lacked them, such as humans and birds.
Composite beings, articulating parts of different predators, became popular, being depicted in multiple media.
This shared visual culture resulted from the expansion, adoption, and local adaptation of the Cupisnique-Chavín religious tradition, one of the earliest and most clear cases of religious integration in the Andes.
The results of archaeological research in the 20th and 21st centuries have provided abundant information to approximate the ritual practices associated with this religious tradition.
In the ceremonial centers—designed to accommodate large audiences—friezes and sculptures depict nonhuman beings with attributes of predators.
During ceremonies, people feasted, played music, shared knowledge and experiences, and interacted with these images of supernatural characteristics.
The middens surrounding these temples are filled with the remains of these activities, such as broken ceramics, food remains, ritual paraphernalia, and even friezes—discarded during work feasts dedicated to architectural renovation.
Traditionally, these images depicted in sculptures and friezes have been considered representations of a pantheon of divinities.
These interpretations were based on theoretical assumptions about the relationship between sacred and profane, nature and culture, human and nonhuman, and personhood.
In theoretical frameworks that reevaluate the ontology of Indigenous people of the Ancient Americas—such as adaptations of Viveiros de Castro’s multinatural perspectivism and theory on Andean huacas—these stone sculptures, buildings, and landscape features can be considered powerful nonhuman persons and important members of the communities.
These ancient Andean beings must have acquired power from their relationship with the community and local landscapes.
This sets them apart from the view of omnipresent divinities in modern world religions.
In a world where one’s knowledge is acquired through experiencing the world, a way to acquire new knowledge may have involved seeing the world through the eyes of other beings.
In the Cupisnique-Chavín world, the most powerful and wise of these nonhuman entities may have been those stone beings with multispecies abilities housed in the temples.
The institution of pilgrimage may have emerged because of the need to acquire new knowledge from these extraordinary beings believed to dwell throughout the central Andes.
While scholarly research is thriving in the first decades of the 21st century, there are obstacles in the way of sharing these results with the nonscholarly public.
Involuntarily, the reconstruction of the ceremonial temples has created solemn and sterile images of these ancient ceremonial temples, very far from the archaeological description of the findings in these places.
This creates a continuing gap between what is known about these Cupisnique-Chavín ritual practices—and the role of the nonhuman in them—and the perception of the public as to this tradition.
Related Results
Contribution à une redéfinition du « Formatif » péruvien : l’horizon Cupisnique-Chavín
Contribution à une redéfinition du « Formatif » péruvien : l’horizon Cupisnique-Chavín
Les premières civilisations péruviennes se sont épanouies pendant la période dite « formative » entre 2500 av. J.-C. et le début de notre ère. Les connaissances actuelles sur le Fo...
La cronología de Chavín de Huántar y sus implicancias para el Periodo Formativo
La cronología de Chavín de Huántar y sus implicancias para el Periodo Formativo
Chavín de Huántar es uno de los sitios fundamentales para entender el Periodo Formativo en los Andes centrales. Irónicamente, a pesar de muchas décadas de investigaciones realizada...
Emblems of Cultural Identity in Early Andean Art
Emblems of Cultural Identity in Early Andean Art
This chapter employs the traditional art historical methods of formal analysis and iconography to understand head motifs engraved on Cupisnique ceramics that were made between 1200...
Paracas Cavernas and Chavin
Paracas Cavernas and Chavin
El Prof. Kroeber analiza en este trabajo sus discrepancias con Willey, con quien concuerda en que lo conocido del material de Cavernas no es total o estrictamente de estilo chavín,...
Chavin culture (pre‐Moche)
Chavin culture (pre‐Moche)
Abstract
Chavin culture refers to the 1200–500
bce
, middle and Late Formative periods societies of the central Andes of South Americ...
Archaism or Tradition?: The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Moche Iconography
Archaism or Tradition?: The Decapitation Theme in Cupisnique and Moche Iconography
The Cupisnique (ca. 1000-200 B. C.) and the Moche (ca. 100 B. C.-A. D. 800) inhabited much of the same territory of Peru's north coast in Precolumbian times, and both are noted for...
Lithospheric Structure of the Central Andes Forearc from Gravity Data Modeling: Implication for Plate Coupling
Lithospheric Structure of the Central Andes Forearc from Gravity Data Modeling: Implication for Plate Coupling
Abstract
Geodetic and seismological data indicates that the Central Andes subduction zone is highly coupled. To understand the plate locking mechanism within the Cen...
¿Cupisnique en la Sierra Central? Piezas de “Cupisnique Clásico” en Piquimina y Campanayuq Rumi
¿Cupisnique en la Sierra Central? Piezas de “Cupisnique Clásico” en Piquimina y Campanayuq Rumi
Este artículo presenta evidencias de cerámica asociadas al estilo “Cupisnique Clásico” en los sitios de Campanayuq Rumi en la sierra centro-sur y Piquimina en lasierra central. Est...

