Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

CHINA IN CAMEROON: NEO-COLONIALISM OR PARTNERSHIP?

View through CrossRef
Since establishing diplomatic relations in 1971, China’s growing economic engagement with Cameroon has sparked significant debate over whether this relationship constitutes neo-colonialism or represents a genuine development partnership. This study critically analyzes China’s involvement in Cameroon, focusing on key areas such as infrastructure investment, trade dynamics, soft power initiatives, and governance impacts. A systematic literature review was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines, with data extracted from electronic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, JSTOR, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. Keywords such as “China AND Cameroon,” “Belt and Road Initiative,” and “Exim Bank Cameroon” were used to identify peer-reviewed articles and working papers. The analysis finds that Chinese investments in infrastructure and energy have positively impacted Cameroon’s economic growth and regional connectivity, particularly through projects like hydroelectric dams and ports. However, these benefits are accompanied by trade imbalances, where Cameroon remains a supplier of raw commodities, while imports of low-cost manufactured goods from China continue to undermine the development of local industries. Soft power initiatives such as the Confucius Institute and cultural exchanges have helped strengthen educational ties but have also raised concerns about labor market competition and cultural assimilation. Despite the developmental gains, the study argues that China’s engagement in Cameroon aligns more closely with neo-colonialism than a true partnership. While infrastructure and cultural exchanges have contributed to short-term growth, the debt-driven investments and the limited substantial technology transfer perpetuate Cameroon’s economic dependence on China. The paper concludes with policy recommendations for Cameroon to diversify its economic base, renegotiate investment terms, and strengthen local governance to reduce dependency and ensure sustainable development.
Universitatea 1 Decembrie 1918 din Alba Iulia / 1 Decembrie 1918 University of Alba Iulia
Title: CHINA IN CAMEROON: NEO-COLONIALISM OR PARTNERSHIP?
Description:
Since establishing diplomatic relations in 1971, China’s growing economic engagement with Cameroon has sparked significant debate over whether this relationship constitutes neo-colonialism or represents a genuine development partnership.
This study critically analyzes China’s involvement in Cameroon, focusing on key areas such as infrastructure investment, trade dynamics, soft power initiatives, and governance impacts.
A systematic literature review was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines, with data extracted from electronic databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, JSTOR, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Keywords such as “China AND Cameroon,” “Belt and Road Initiative,” and “Exim Bank Cameroon” were used to identify peer-reviewed articles and working papers.
The analysis finds that Chinese investments in infrastructure and energy have positively impacted Cameroon’s economic growth and regional connectivity, particularly through projects like hydroelectric dams and ports.
However, these benefits are accompanied by trade imbalances, where Cameroon remains a supplier of raw commodities, while imports of low-cost manufactured goods from China continue to undermine the development of local industries.
Soft power initiatives such as the Confucius Institute and cultural exchanges have helped strengthen educational ties but have also raised concerns about labor market competition and cultural assimilation.
Despite the developmental gains, the study argues that China’s engagement in Cameroon aligns more closely with neo-colonialism than a true partnership.
While infrastructure and cultural exchanges have contributed to short-term growth, the debt-driven investments and the limited substantial technology transfer perpetuate Cameroon’s economic dependence on China.
The paper concludes with policy recommendations for Cameroon to diversify its economic base, renegotiate investment terms, and strengthen local governance to reduce dependency and ensure sustainable development.

Related Results

Pedagogical partnership in higher education institutions: expediency and capabilities
Pedagogical partnership in higher education institutions: expediency and capabilities
The article deals with the issues related to pedagogical partnership in higher education institutions. The author analyses its essence, the reason for its popularity in a number of...
Colonialism
Colonialism
Few topics in the discipline of anthropology are as important, and controversial, as colonialism. The historical origins of anthropology are rooted in the colonial enterprise, thus...
Abstract B180: Molecular pathology in cancer medicine: Our experience in Cameroon.
Abstract B180: Molecular pathology in cancer medicine: Our experience in Cameroon.
Abstract Background: Cameroon, located in Central Africa, is a developing country with a population of approximately 20,000,000 millions.Cameroon's Public Health Car...
Neo Banks: A Paradigm Shift in Banking
Neo Banks: A Paradigm Shift in Banking
Purpose: In terms of market structure and competitiveness, Indian banking has seen major changes. The future of banking services is being revolutionised by technical and digital ad...
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FINANCING SYSTEM
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IN THE SUSTAINABLE HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FINANCING SYSTEM
The restoration and development of infrastructure directly provides the foundation for economic growth. Given the limited state financial resources and the significant scale ...
Settler Colonialism and African Americans
Settler Colonialism and African Americans
Emerging from the ranks of white settler scholars in Australia and New Zealand in the mid-2000s, the discourse of settler colonialism has become the “official” idiolect with substa...

Back to Top