Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Sharps injuries prevention among healthcare providers in surgical, medical and pediatric wards of a public hospital in Jimma Zone: a best practice implementation project
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Background:
Sharps injuries are a serious public health problem that healthcare providers face and constitute a major risk for the transmission of blood-borne infections. Prevention of sharps injuries in hospitals requires that healthcare providers comply with universal precautions.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to assess and improve the compliance of healthcare providers with protocols based on best available evidence for prevention of sharps injuries in medical, surgical and pediatric wards of the hospital.
Methods:
A three-phase clinical audit was carried out using the online JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice Program. Six audit criteria based on available evidence were used. Phase 1 of the project was the baseline audit, phase 2 the implementation of the best practice, and phase 3 the follow-up audit. Data were collected through observation, interview and resource inventory.
Results:
The postintervention compliance report showed maximum improvement in compliance in criterion 1 (sharps containers are not filled above the mark that indicates the bin is full) and criterion 2 (sharps containers are positioned out of the reach of children at a height that enables safe disposal by staff). Between the baseline and postintervention audits, the compliance rate for these criteria improved by more than half (criterion 1) and by nine-fold (criterion 2) (from 38 to 100% and 0 to 93%, respectively). During baseline, two nurses reported experiencing sharps injuries, noting that they think it is not important to report the injury if the patient is negative for HIV, and when they do not know where to report it, regardless. At the postintervention audit no injuries were reported.
Conclusion:
The best practice recommendations using a clinical audit process was an effective intervention for improving knowledge and compliance of healthcare workers with protocols for the prevention of sharps injuries in low-resource settings.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Sharps injuries prevention among healthcare providers in surgical, medical and pediatric wards of a public hospital in Jimma Zone: a best practice implementation project
Description:
ABSTRACT
Background:
Sharps injuries are a serious public health problem that healthcare providers face and constitute a major risk for the transmission of blood-borne infections.
Prevention of sharps injuries in hospitals requires that healthcare providers comply with universal precautions.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to assess and improve the compliance of healthcare providers with protocols based on best available evidence for prevention of sharps injuries in medical, surgical and pediatric wards of the hospital.
Methods:
A three-phase clinical audit was carried out using the online JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System and Getting Research into Practice Program.
Six audit criteria based on available evidence were used.
Phase 1 of the project was the baseline audit, phase 2 the implementation of the best practice, and phase 3 the follow-up audit.
Data were collected through observation, interview and resource inventory.
Results:
The postintervention compliance report showed maximum improvement in compliance in criterion 1 (sharps containers are not filled above the mark that indicates the bin is full) and criterion 2 (sharps containers are positioned out of the reach of children at a height that enables safe disposal by staff).
Between the baseline and postintervention audits, the compliance rate for these criteria improved by more than half (criterion 1) and by nine-fold (criterion 2) (from 38 to 100% and 0 to 93%, respectively).
During baseline, two nurses reported experiencing sharps injuries, noting that they think it is not important to report the injury if the patient is negative for HIV, and when they do not know where to report it, regardless.
At the postintervention audit no injuries were reported.
Conclusion:
The best practice recommendations using a clinical audit process was an effective intervention for improving knowledge and compliance of healthcare workers with protocols for the prevention of sharps injuries in low-resource settings.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
OCCUPATIONAL SHARPS INJURY AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS IN HOSPITAL MELAKA 2013 – 2015: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
OCCUPATIONAL SHARPS INJURY AMONG HEALTHCARE WORKERS IN HOSPITAL MELAKA 2013 – 2015: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
Sharps injury imposed a major threat towards safety and health among healthcare workers (HCWs). Many studies in Malaysia concentrated on prevalence of needle stick injury (NSI), ho...
Healthcare waste and sharps management
Healthcare waste and sharps management
Engineered sharps safety devices have delivered a substantial reduction in sharps injuries to healthcare professionals but disposal-related errors and subsequent injury to ancillar...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract
Introduction
Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
The Pediatric Anesthesiology Workforce: Projecting Supply and Trends 2015–2035
BACKGROUND:
A workforce analysis was conducted to predict whether the projected future supply of pediatric anesthesiologists is balanced with the requirements o...
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract
Introduction
Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
The Geographic Distribution of Pediatric Anesthesiologists Relative to the US Pediatric Population
BACKGROUND:
The geographic relationship between pediatric anesthesiologists and the pediatric population has potentially important clinical and policy implications. In ...
DENGUE OUTBREAK -IS THE PANIC JUSTIFIED ?
DENGUE OUTBREAK -IS THE PANIC JUSTIFIED ?
In this era of startling developments in the medical field there remains a serious worry about the hazardous potential of various by products which if not properly addre...

