Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Measuring rurality in health services research: a scoping review

View through CrossRef
Abstract Purpose This study is a scoping review of the different methods used to measure rurality in the health services research (HSR) literature. Methods We identified peer-reviewed empirical studies from 2010–2020 from seven leading HSR journals, including the Journal of Rural Health, that used any definition to measure rurality as a part of their analysis. From each study, we identified the geographic unit (e.g., county, zip code) and definition (e.g., Rural Urban Continuum Codes, Rural Urban Commuting Areas) used to classify categories of rurality. We analyzed whether geographic units and definitions used to classify rurality differed by focus area of studies, including costs, quality, and access to care. Lastly, we examined the number of rural categories used by authors to assess rural areas. Findings In 103 included studies, five different geographic units and 11 definitions were used to measure rurality. The most common geographic units used to measure rurality were county (n = 59, 57%), which was used most frequently in studies examining cost (n = 12, 75%) and access (n = 33, 57.9%). Rural Urban Commuting Area codes were the most common definition used to measure rurality for studies examining access (n = 13, 22.8%) and quality (n = 10, 44%). The majority of included studies made rural versus urban comparisons (n = 82, 80%) as opposed to focusing on rural populations only (n = 21, 20%). Among studies that compared rural and urban populations, most studies used only one category to identify rural locations (n = 49 of 82 studies, 60%). Conclusion Geographic units and definitions to determine rurality were used inconsistently within and across studies with an HSR focus. This finding may affect how health disparities by rural location are determined and thus how resources and federal funds are allocated. Future research should focus on developing a standardized system to determine under what circumstances researchers should use different geographic units and methods to determine rurality by HSR focus area.
Title: Measuring rurality in health services research: a scoping review
Description:
Abstract Purpose This study is a scoping review of the different methods used to measure rurality in the health services research (HSR) literature.
Methods We identified peer-reviewed empirical studies from 2010–2020 from seven leading HSR journals, including the Journal of Rural Health, that used any definition to measure rurality as a part of their analysis.
From each study, we identified the geographic unit (e.
g.
, county, zip code) and definition (e.
g.
, Rural Urban Continuum Codes, Rural Urban Commuting Areas) used to classify categories of rurality.
We analyzed whether geographic units and definitions used to classify rurality differed by focus area of studies, including costs, quality, and access to care.
Lastly, we examined the number of rural categories used by authors to assess rural areas.
Findings In 103 included studies, five different geographic units and 11 definitions were used to measure rurality.
The most common geographic units used to measure rurality were county (n = 59, 57%), which was used most frequently in studies examining cost (n = 12, 75%) and access (n = 33, 57.
9%).
Rural Urban Commuting Area codes were the most common definition used to measure rurality for studies examining access (n = 13, 22.
8%) and quality (n = 10, 44%).
The majority of included studies made rural versus urban comparisons (n = 82, 80%) as opposed to focusing on rural populations only (n = 21, 20%).
Among studies that compared rural and urban populations, most studies used only one category to identify rural locations (n = 49 of 82 studies, 60%).
Conclusion Geographic units and definitions to determine rurality were used inconsistently within and across studies with an HSR focus.
This finding may affect how health disparities by rural location are determined and thus how resources and federal funds are allocated.
Future research should focus on developing a standardized system to determine under what circumstances researchers should use different geographic units and methods to determine rurality by HSR focus area.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Well-being focused interventions for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities-a scoping review protocol
Well-being focused interventions for caregivers of children with developmental disabilities-a scoping review protocol
AbstractIntroductionChildren with developmental disabilities (DD) have complex health needs which imply that they will need assistance in many areas of their lives, a role usually ...
Multi-Criteria Clinic Allocation in Massachusetts to Reduce Access to Healthcare Disparities
Multi-Criteria Clinic Allocation in Massachusetts to Reduce Access to Healthcare Disparities
Rural populations in the United States experience challenges in accessing healthcare facilities in ambulatory setting. While ambulatory healthcare facility location decisions have ...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
A scoping review on the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China
A scoping review on the methodological and reporting quality of scoping reviews in China
Abstract Background Scoping reviews have emerged as a valuable method for synthesizing emerging evidence, offering a comprehensive contextual overview, and influencing pol...
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Poor housing is associated with poor health. This suggests that improving housing conditions might lead to improved health for residents. This review searched widely for studies fr...
Telehealth Evaluation in the United States: Protocol for a Scoping Review (Preprint)
Telehealth Evaluation in the United States: Protocol for a Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The rapid expansion of telehealth services, driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, necessitates systematic evaluation to guarantee the quality, effecti...
Attributes That Influence Human Decision-Making in Complex Health Services: Scoping Review
Attributes That Influence Human Decision-Making in Complex Health Services: Scoping Review
Background Humans currently dominate decision-making in both clinical health services and complex health services such as health policy and health regulation. Many assu...

Back to Top