Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Li Zehou and His Rocky Relationship with Marx

View through CrossRef
The present paper deals with Li Zehou’s contributions to the discussions of Marxism in the second half of the 20th century. In Li’s philosophy, Marx’s theories were reshaped, modified, and upgraded in a theoretical framework that differed from the original. He agreed with Marx’s presumption that the making and using of tools was the basic material practice, which made human evolution possible. Nevertheless, he saw Marx’s further development of this theory as problematic, because he saw it as being one-sided: progress from the means of production to the relations of production, and then on to the superstructure, only concerned the external developments of the relation between the manufacture and use of tools. At this point, Li was more interested in their internal influences, i.e., in the ways in which the making and use of tools has reshaped the human mind. He was highly sceptical of Marxist economic theories and criticized the crucial concepts elaborated by Marx in his Capital through the lens of Kantian “transcendental illusions”. Proceeding from his combination of Marx and Kant, the present paper will critically analyse some crucial differences between the Marxian idea of the class struggle as a driving force of social progress, and Li’s own version of historical materialism.
University of Ljubljana
Title: Li Zehou and His Rocky Relationship with Marx
Description:
The present paper deals with Li Zehou’s contributions to the discussions of Marxism in the second half of the 20th century.
In Li’s philosophy, Marx’s theories were reshaped, modified, and upgraded in a theoretical framework that differed from the original.
He agreed with Marx’s presumption that the making and using of tools was the basic material practice, which made human evolution possible.
Nevertheless, he saw Marx’s further development of this theory as problematic, because he saw it as being one-sided: progress from the means of production to the relations of production, and then on to the superstructure, only concerned the external developments of the relation between the manufacture and use of tools.
At this point, Li was more interested in their internal influences, i.
e.
, in the ways in which the making and use of tools has reshaped the human mind.
He was highly sceptical of Marxist economic theories and criticized the crucial concepts elaborated by Marx in his Capital through the lens of Kantian “transcendental illusions”.
Proceeding from his combination of Marx and Kant, the present paper will critically analyse some crucial differences between the Marxian idea of the class struggle as a driving force of social progress, and Li’s own version of historical materialism.

Related Results

L’ontologie de Li Zehou 李泽厚 : Une intégration transculturelle de la philosophie
L’ontologie de Li Zehou 李泽厚 : Une intégration transculturelle de la philosophie
Li Zehou 李泽厚 (1930 - ) est l’une des plus importantes figures de la philosophie chinoise contemporaine. A l’issue d’un itinéraire philosophique qui le conduit de Changsha à Beijing...
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
David McLellan, interviewed here, is a Fellow of Goldsmiths College, University of London and Emeritus Professor of Political Theory, University of Kent. Since the 1970s he has bee...
If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
If I Had Possession over Judgment Day: Augmenting Robert Johnson
augmentvb [ɔːgˈmɛnt]1. to make or become greater in number, amount, strength, etc.; increase2. Music: to increase (a major or perfect interval) by a semitone (Collins English Dicti...
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
Ary Scheffer, een Nederlandse Fransman
AbstractAry Scheffer (1795-1858) is so generally included in the French School (Note 2)- unsurprisingly, since his career was confined almost entirely to Paris - that the fact that...
Book Review "Friedrich Engels: Pemikiran dan Kritik" (Friedrich Engels: Thought and Criticism)
Book Review "Friedrich Engels: Pemikiran dan Kritik" (Friedrich Engels: Thought and Criticism)
Not infrequently people only know Friedrich Engels as the scribe of Karl Marx. His only job was to collect, retype Marx's papers and give them to publishers. Some books describe hi...
Slaveri hos Tuaregerne i Sahara
Slaveri hos Tuaregerne i Sahara
Slavery among the Tuareg in the SaharaA preliminary analysis of its structure.Slavery is an institution of very considerable age. In Europe and the Orient it has been common for as...
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
AbstractAndrew Kliman’s Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’ sets out to refute the ‘myth’ that Marx’s original presentation of the theory of the value is internally inconsistent. A century...
Crocodile Hunt
Crocodile Hunt
Saturday, 24 July 1971, Tower Mill Hotel The man jiggles the brick, gauges its weight. His stout hand, a flash of his watch dial, the sleeve rolled back, muscles on the upper arm ...

Back to Top