Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Li Zehou and His Rocky Relationship with Marx

View through CrossRef
The present paper deals with Li Zehou’s contributions to the discussions of Marxism in the second half of the 20th century. In Li’s philosophy, Marx’s theories were reshaped, modified, and upgraded in a theoretical framework that differed from the original. He agreed with Marx’s presumption that the making and using of tools was the basic material practice, which made human evolution possible. Nevertheless, he saw Marx’s further development of this theory as problematic, because he saw it as being one-sided: progress from the means of production to the relations of production, and then on to the superstructure, only concerned the external developments of the relation between the manufacture and use of tools. At this point, Li was more interested in their internal influences, i.e., in the ways in which the making and use of tools has reshaped the human mind. He was highly sceptical of Marxist economic theories and criticized the crucial concepts elaborated by Marx in his Capital through the lens of Kantian “transcendental illusions”. Proceeding from his combination of Marx and Kant, the present paper will critically analyse some crucial differences between the Marxian idea of the class struggle as a driving force of social progress, and Li’s own version of historical materialism.
University of Ljubljana
Title: Li Zehou and His Rocky Relationship with Marx
Description:
The present paper deals with Li Zehou’s contributions to the discussions of Marxism in the second half of the 20th century.
In Li’s philosophy, Marx’s theories were reshaped, modified, and upgraded in a theoretical framework that differed from the original.
He agreed with Marx’s presumption that the making and using of tools was the basic material practice, which made human evolution possible.
Nevertheless, he saw Marx’s further development of this theory as problematic, because he saw it as being one-sided: progress from the means of production to the relations of production, and then on to the superstructure, only concerned the external developments of the relation between the manufacture and use of tools.
At this point, Li was more interested in their internal influences, i.
e.
, in the ways in which the making and use of tools has reshaped the human mind.
He was highly sceptical of Marxist economic theories and criticized the crucial concepts elaborated by Marx in his Capital through the lens of Kantian “transcendental illusions”.
Proceeding from his combination of Marx and Kant, the present paper will critically analyse some crucial differences between the Marxian idea of the class struggle as a driving force of social progress, and Li’s own version of historical materialism.

Related Results

L’ontologie de Li Zehou 李泽厚 : Une intégration transculturelle de la philosophie
L’ontologie de Li Zehou 李泽厚 : Une intégration transculturelle de la philosophie
Li Zehou 李泽厚 (1930 - ) est l’une des plus importantes figures de la philosophie chinoise contemporaine. A l’issue d’un itinéraire philosophique qui le conduit de Changsha à Beijing...
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
Interview with David McLellan July 2018
David McLellan, interviewed here, is a Fellow of Goldsmiths College, University of London and Emeritus Professor of Political Theory, University of Kent. Since the 1970s he has bee...
Book Review "Friedrich Engels: Pemikiran dan Kritik" (Friedrich Engels: Thought and Criticism)
Book Review "Friedrich Engels: Pemikiran dan Kritik" (Friedrich Engels: Thought and Criticism)
Not infrequently people only know Friedrich Engels as the scribe of Karl Marx. His only job was to collect, retype Marx's papers and give them to publishers. Some books describe hi...
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007.
AbstractAndrew Kliman’s Reclaiming Marx’s ‘Capital’ sets out to refute the ‘myth’ that Marx’s original presentation of the theory of the value is internally inconsistent. A century...
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx
Hannah Arendt and Karl Marx: On Totalitarianism and the Tradition of Western Political Thought is the first book to examine Hannah Arendt’s unpublished writings on Marx in their to...
Slaveri hos Tuaregerne i Sahara
Slaveri hos Tuaregerne i Sahara
Slavery among the Tuareg in the SaharaA preliminary analysis of its structure.Slavery is an institution of very considerable age. In Europe and the Orient it has been common for as...
Karl Marx
Karl Marx
Karl Marx (b. 1818–d. 1883) was born into a Jewish family living in the Rhineland region of Prussia. Marx’s father was a lawyer whose conversion to Christianity allowed him to cont...
¿Por qué leer a Marx hoy?
¿Por qué leer a Marx hoy?
¿Y por qué no habría de leerlo? En el caso particular de Marx, ha habido a lo largo del tiempo, y hay aún, tanto discurso anti-Marx y también antimarxista que, entre todos los auto...

Back to Top