Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Changing Leadership Behaviors in a Public Health Agency Through Coaching and Multirater Feedback
View through CrossRef
Context:
Public health managers' leadership skills can be improved through multirater feedback and coaching.
Objective:
To explore to what extent participation in a coaching intervention influences leadership behaviors of first- and second-level leaders in a federal public health agency.
Design:
Team leads and branch chiefs in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP) were invited to participate in the Coaching and Leadership Initiative (CaLI), which incorporates the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Leadership 360 assessment, 6 coaching sessions, and 2 in-depth interviews.
Setting:
NCHHSTP is one of 16 CDC national centers, institute, and offices.
Participants:
Staff serving as team leads or branch chiefs.
Main Outcome Measures:
Two in-depth interviews explored CaLI's influence on leadership behaviors regarding the government-wide Leading People executive core qualification.
Results:
A total of 103 (93%) CaLI participants completed the OPM 360 feedback, 82 (80%) completed leadership coaching; 71 of 82 (87%) completed phase 1 interview, and 46 of 71 (65%) completed phase 2 interview. Eighty unique participants completed 1 or more interviews; all indicated that CaLI helped provide new perspectives, practices, and approaches that led to better communication and relationships, different approaches to conflict resolution, and awareness of individual leadership practices. Of the 71 participants who completed phase 1 evaluation, 66 (93%) said they made changes in developing others, 56 (79%) completed conflict management and team building, and 16 (23%) completed leveraging diversity. Of the 46 participants who completed both phase 1 and phase 2 interviews and among those who made changes post-CaLI, 23 of 26 (88%) sustained those leadership changes in developing others, 21 of 27 (78%) in team building; 24 of 34 (71%) in conflict management; and 5 of 10 (50%) in leveraging diversity.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates the benefits and effectiveness of using multirater feedback and leadership coaching for first- and midlevel public health leaders.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Changing Leadership Behaviors in a Public Health Agency Through Coaching and Multirater Feedback
Description:
Context:
Public health managers' leadership skills can be improved through multirater feedback and coaching.
Objective:
To explore to what extent participation in a coaching intervention influences leadership behaviors of first- and second-level leaders in a federal public health agency.
Design:
Team leads and branch chiefs in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP) were invited to participate in the Coaching and Leadership Initiative (CaLI), which incorporates the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Leadership 360 assessment, 6 coaching sessions, and 2 in-depth interviews.
Setting:
NCHHSTP is one of 16 CDC national centers, institute, and offices.
Participants:
Staff serving as team leads or branch chiefs.
Main Outcome Measures:
Two in-depth interviews explored CaLI's influence on leadership behaviors regarding the government-wide Leading People executive core qualification.
Results:
A total of 103 (93%) CaLI participants completed the OPM 360 feedback, 82 (80%) completed leadership coaching; 71 of 82 (87%) completed phase 1 interview, and 46 of 71 (65%) completed phase 2 interview.
Eighty unique participants completed 1 or more interviews; all indicated that CaLI helped provide new perspectives, practices, and approaches that led to better communication and relationships, different approaches to conflict resolution, and awareness of individual leadership practices.
Of the 71 participants who completed phase 1 evaluation, 66 (93%) said they made changes in developing others, 56 (79%) completed conflict management and team building, and 16 (23%) completed leveraging diversity.
Of the 46 participants who completed both phase 1 and phase 2 interviews and among those who made changes post-CaLI, 23 of 26 (88%) sustained those leadership changes in developing others, 21 of 27 (78%) in team building; 24 of 34 (71%) in conflict management; and 5 of 10 (50%) in leveraging diversity.
Conclusions:
This study demonstrates the benefits and effectiveness of using multirater feedback and leadership coaching for first- and midlevel public health leaders.
Related Results
Coaching to Leadership Trust Towards an Intrapreneurial Framework
Coaching to Leadership Trust Towards an Intrapreneurial Framework
Leadership trust is a crucial element in fostering effective leadership and building strong relationships between leaders and their teams. Coaching has gained recognition as a powe...
Leading Organizational Change: Improved Leadership Behaviors Among Public Health Leaders After Receiving Multirater Feedback and Coaching
Leading Organizational Change: Improved Leadership Behaviors Among Public Health Leaders After Receiving Multirater Feedback and Coaching
Background:
Leading Change is one of five Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) used in developing leaders in the federal government. Leadership development prog...
Who is a coach and who is a coaching psychologist? Professionalising coaching psychology in the United Kingdom
Who is a coach and who is a coaching psychologist? Professionalising coaching psychology in the United Kingdom
As the British Psychological Society establishes a new Division of Coaching Psychology and routes to chartered membership for coaching psychologists, we revisit the ongoing dialogu...
A Christian Servant Leadership Model and Training for the Adventist Church in France
A Christian Servant Leadership Model and Training for the Adventist Church in France
Problem. French history (the French Revolution) has shaped a country considered as one of the most secular in the world. The Seventh-day Adventist Church in France is profoundly af...
Group coaching: The new ‘Wild West of coaching’?
Group coaching: The new ‘Wild West of coaching’?
Literature on group coaching is scarce, but growing evidence points to an area ripe for further exploration. Group coaching is scalable, cost-effective and arguably better suited t...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Early Career Teacher's Perceptions of Instructional Coaching on Self-Efficacy
Early Career Teacher's Perceptions of Instructional Coaching on Self-Efficacy
The purpose of this qualitative narrative study was to explore how Early Career Teachers (ECTs) perceive the ways in which virtual coaching influenced their self-efficacy, or confi...
Training for the coaching leader: how organizations can support managers
Training for the coaching leader: how organizations can support managers
Purpose
The demand for leaders to coach their employees is increasing as the benefits become more and more evident. However, little is known about the training managers have receiv...

