Javascript must be enabled to continue!
An Intercomparison of Satellite Derived Arctic Sea Ice Motion Products
View through CrossRef
Arctic sea ice motion information provides an important scientific basis for revealing the changing mechanism of Arctic sea ice and assessing the navigational safety of Arctic waterways. For now, many satellite derived Arctic sea ice motion products have been released but few studies have conducted comparisons of these products. In this study, eleven satellite sea ice motion products from the Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF), the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), and the French Research Institute for the Exploitation of the Seas (Ifremer) were systematically evaluated and compared based on buoys from the International Arctic Buoy Program (IABP) and the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) over 2018–2020. The results show that the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of ice speed for these products are 1.15–2.26 km/d and the MAEs of ice motion angle are 14.93–23.19°. Among all products, Ifremer_AMSR2 achieves the best accuracy in terms of speed error, NSIDC_Pathfinder shows the lowest angle error and OSI-405-c_Merged performs best in sea-ice drift trajectory reconstruction. Moreover, season, region, data source, ice drift tracking algorithm, and time interval all influence the accuracy of these products: (1) The sea ice motion bias in the freezing season (1.04–1.96 km/d and 11.93–22.41°) is smaller than that in the melting season (1.13–3.90 km/d and 14.41–27.41°) for most of the products. (2) Most products perform worst in East Greenland, where ice movements are fast and complex. (3) The accuracies of the products derived from AMSR-2 remotely sensed data are better than those from other data sources. (4) The continuous maximum cross-correlation (CMCC) algorithm outperforms the maximum cross-correlation (MCC) algorithm in sea ice drift retrieval. (5) The MAEs of sea ice motion with longer time interval are relatively smaller. Overall, the results indicate that the eleven remote sensing Arctic sea ice drift products are of practical use for data assimilation and model validation if uncertainties are appropriately considered. Furthermore, this study provides some improvement directions for sea ice drift retrieval from satellite data.
Title: An Intercomparison of Satellite Derived Arctic Sea Ice Motion Products
Description:
Arctic sea ice motion information provides an important scientific basis for revealing the changing mechanism of Arctic sea ice and assessing the navigational safety of Arctic waterways.
For now, many satellite derived Arctic sea ice motion products have been released but few studies have conducted comparisons of these products.
In this study, eleven satellite sea ice motion products from the Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI SAF), the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), and the French Research Institute for the Exploitation of the Seas (Ifremer) were systematically evaluated and compared based on buoys from the International Arctic Buoy Program (IABP) and the Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) over 2018–2020.
The results show that the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of ice speed for these products are 1.
15–2.
26 km/d and the MAEs of ice motion angle are 14.
93–23.
19°.
Among all products, Ifremer_AMSR2 achieves the best accuracy in terms of speed error, NSIDC_Pathfinder shows the lowest angle error and OSI-405-c_Merged performs best in sea-ice drift trajectory reconstruction.
Moreover, season, region, data source, ice drift tracking algorithm, and time interval all influence the accuracy of these products: (1) The sea ice motion bias in the freezing season (1.
04–1.
96 km/d and 11.
93–22.
41°) is smaller than that in the melting season (1.
13–3.
90 km/d and 14.
41–27.
41°) for most of the products.
(2) Most products perform worst in East Greenland, where ice movements are fast and complex.
(3) The accuracies of the products derived from AMSR-2 remotely sensed data are better than those from other data sources.
(4) The continuous maximum cross-correlation (CMCC) algorithm outperforms the maximum cross-correlation (MCC) algorithm in sea ice drift retrieval.
(5) The MAEs of sea ice motion with longer time interval are relatively smaller.
Overall, the results indicate that the eleven remote sensing Arctic sea ice drift products are of practical use for data assimilation and model validation if uncertainties are appropriately considered.
Furthermore, this study provides some improvement directions for sea ice drift retrieval from satellite data.
Related Results
Ground ice detection and implications for permafrost geomorphology
Ground ice detection and implications for permafrost geomorphology
Most permafrost contains ground ice, often as pore ice or thin veins or lenses of ice. In certain circumstance, larger bodies of ice can form, such as ice wedges, or massive lenses...
한국의 북극 거버넌스 구축 및 참여 전략 (Changes in the Arctic and Establishment of New Arctic Governance)
한국의 북극 거버넌스 구축 및 참여 전략 (Changes in the Arctic and Establishment of New Arctic Governance)
<b>Korean Abstract:</b> 21세기 들어 북극 지역의 변화가 가시화되면서 북극이 새롭게 조명을 받고 있다. ‘북극의 변화’는 상호 밀접한 관계를 지닌 세 가지 변화가 중심을 이루고 있다. 첫 번째는 기후변화로 인해 북극의 해빙 속도가 보다 빨라지고 그 범위가 점차 확대되면서, 국제사회...
Dissolved Neodymium Isotopes Trace Origin and Spatiotemporal Evolution of Modern Arctic Sea Ice
Dissolved Neodymium Isotopes Trace Origin and Spatiotemporal Evolution of Modern Arctic Sea Ice
<p>The lifetime and thickness of Arctic sea ice have markedly decreased in the recent past. This affects Arctic marine ecosystems and the biological pump, given that ...
Increasing transnational sea‐ice exchange in a changing Arctic Ocean
Increasing transnational sea‐ice exchange in a changing Arctic Ocean
AbstractThe changing Arctic sea‐ice cover is likely to impact the trans‐border exchange of sea ice between the exclusive economic zones (EEZs) of the Arctic nations, affecting the ...
Seasonal Arctic sea ice predictability and prediction
Seasonal Arctic sea ice predictability and prediction
Arctic sea ice plays a central role in the Earth’s climate. Changes in the sea ice on seasonal-to-interannual timescales impact ecosystems, populations and a growing number of stak...
Sea-ice ridges - an understudied yet key component of the Arctic sea-ice system
Sea-ice ridges - an understudied yet key component of the Arctic sea-ice system
Sea-ice ridges (or more precisely, deformed ice) constitute a large fraction of the Arctic ice pack, however, estimates range broadly from 30 to 70%. Yet, we know disproportionally...
Evolution of Arctic sea ice in CMS reanalyses
Evolution of Arctic sea ice in CMS reanalyses
Arctic sea ice has recently experienced rapid changes, indicating a transition toward a new sea ice regime dominated by the marginal ice zone (MIZ) during summer. Modifications in ...
Differences in Arctic sea ice simulations from various SODA3 data sets
Differences in Arctic sea ice simulations from various SODA3 data sets
<p>SODA (Simple Ocean Data Assimilation) is one of the ocean reanalysis data widely used in oceanographic research. The SODA3 dataset provides multiple ocean reanalys...

