Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Impact of Antitrust Fines on the Formation of Collusive Cartels

View through CrossRef
Abstract The literature on collusive cartels has mainly focused on the impact of antitrust fines on the sustainability of cartels, in infinitely repeated games. This approach, however, does not allow us to study the effect of antitrust fines on the incentives to form cartels in the first place. In this paper, we adopt a coalitional game approach to modeling collusive agreements, showing that antitrust fines may drive firms from partial cartels to a monopolistic cartel. Moreover, by introducing uncertainty on market demand, we show that the socially optimal competition policy can call for a finite or even zero antitrust penalty, even if there are no enforcement costs. We provide a sufficient condition for these results to apply to any coalitional game of cartel formation with symmetric firms. Then, we discuss the extension to asymmetric firms and dynamic collusion.
Title: The Impact of Antitrust Fines on the Formation of Collusive Cartels
Description:
Abstract The literature on collusive cartels has mainly focused on the impact of antitrust fines on the sustainability of cartels, in infinitely repeated games.
This approach, however, does not allow us to study the effect of antitrust fines on the incentives to form cartels in the first place.
In this paper, we adopt a coalitional game approach to modeling collusive agreements, showing that antitrust fines may drive firms from partial cartels to a monopolistic cartel.
Moreover, by introducing uncertainty on market demand, we show that the socially optimal competition policy can call for a finite or even zero antitrust penalty, even if there are no enforcement costs.
We provide a sufficient condition for these results to apply to any coalitional game of cartel formation with symmetric firms.
Then, we discuss the extension to asymmetric firms and dynamic collusion.

Related Results

New Brandeis’s New Battleground
New Brandeis’s New Battleground
The neo-Brandeisian movement swept through antitrust like wildfire, hurtling its adherents into prominent Biden Administration posts. But it threatens to be a flash in the pan. Thr...
Time for a New Sherman Act? The Debate on Antitrust Reform in Historical Perspective
Time for a New Sherman Act? The Debate on Antitrust Reform in Historical Perspective
The Sherman Antitrust Act (“Sherman Act” or “Act”), the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, and the Clayton Antitrust Act represent the core antitrust statutes. While these core ...
Day Fines
Day Fines
The day fine concept consists in imposing fines in such a structured way that the final amount of the fine is directly proportionate to offenders’ means and to the offense’s seriou...
Measuring the Antitrust Revolution
Measuring the Antitrust Revolution
Although antitrust always evolved with the economics of its time, economic analysis was not central to the antitrust enterprise until Continental T.V. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania. In doin...
Capitalism, Democratic Capitalism, and the Pursuit of Antitrust Laws
Capitalism, Democratic Capitalism, and the Pursuit of Antitrust Laws
A major global policy development in the last few decades has been the adoption of national antitrust laws by many developing and transition countries. A primarily American creatio...
Improved Selection Criteria for Sand Control - When Are "Fines" Fines?
Improved Selection Criteria for Sand Control - When Are "Fines" Fines?
Abstract When sand control is required in production or injection wells, one of the key design criteria is that the sand control should allow those "fines" present t...
American Gothic: How Chicago Economics Distorts “Consumer Welfare” in Antitrust
American Gothic: How Chicago Economics Distorts “Consumer Welfare” in Antitrust
Since the publication of Robert Bork’s The Antitrust Paradox, lawyers, judges, and many economists have defended “Consumer welfare” (CW) as a standard for decisions about antitrust...
Antitrust Law in China, Korea and Vietnam
Antitrust Law in China, Korea and Vietnam
Abstract Following China’s entry into the WTO in September 2001, it has been keen to establish itself among trading parties as a market economy. In recent years it h...

Back to Top