Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Acute effects of “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching on autonomic nervous responses assessed by heart rate variability
View through CrossRef
Purpose
To analyze if the “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching method significantly modifies the autonomic nervous responses at rest. We tested the hypothesis of a positive influence on the parasympathetic activity.
Methods
Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured in thirty three (including nine females) healthy participants during a tilt test (i.e., 5-min supine followed by 5-min standing) before (pre-) and immediately after (post-) 60 min in either a control condition and 3 days later a “Munz Floor”® session. Time-domain (heart rate, HR); root mean square of the successive differences between RR intervals, (RMSSD), non-linear (standard deviations, SD1, SD2), and frequency-domain (spectral frequencies in very low, VLF; low, LF and high bands) parameters as well as the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAα1) were measured.
Results
In supine position (SU), HR
SU
decreased to la larger extent (−12.4% ± 7.6% vs. −3.8% ± 4.0%, p < 0.001) in the “Munz Floor”® group (62.3 ± 8.7 vs. 54.4 ± 7.3 bpm, p < 0.001, Effect Size (ES) = 0.83) than in the control group (60.8 ± 8.7 vs. 58.4 ± 8.3 bpm, p < 0.01, ES = 0.27). Significant increases in RMSSD
SU
(50.1 ± 30.1 vs. 73.3 ± 48.0 m, p < 0.001, ES = 0.59), HF
SU
(1,212 ± 1,078 vs. 2,672 ± 2,388 m
2
, p < 0.001, ES = 0.72) were reported in the Munz Floor”® but not in the control group. In the standing position (ST): HR
ST
decreased in both the Munz Floor”® (76.6 ± 11.0 vs. 68.8 ± 9.6 bpm, p < 0.001, ES = 0.62) and the control (77.2 ± 12.7 vs. 74.7 ± 11.9 bpm, p < 0.01, ES = 0.20) but the relative change was larger in the “Munz Floor”® (−9.6% ± 9.4% vs. −2.9% ± 6.4%, p < 0.01). Significant increases in RMSSD
ST
(29.5 ± 23.8 vs. 39.9 ± 27.5, p < 0.01, ES = 0.38) and in (LF + HF)
ST
(2,132 ± 2,464 vs. 3,065 ± 3,382 m
2
, p < 0.01, ES = 0.31) were observed only in the “Munz Floor”® group.
Conclusion
The “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching method was effective for acutely increasing the parasympathetic activity. These results suggest “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching as a potential strategy for improving recovery and reducing the impact of stress and fatigue.
Title: Acute effects of “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching on autonomic nervous responses assessed by heart rate variability
Description:
Purpose
To analyze if the “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching method significantly modifies the autonomic nervous responses at rest.
We tested the hypothesis of a positive influence on the parasympathetic activity.
Methods
Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured in thirty three (including nine females) healthy participants during a tilt test (i.
e.
, 5-min supine followed by 5-min standing) before (pre-) and immediately after (post-) 60 min in either a control condition and 3 days later a “Munz Floor”® session.
Time-domain (heart rate, HR); root mean square of the successive differences between RR intervals, (RMSSD), non-linear (standard deviations, SD1, SD2), and frequency-domain (spectral frequencies in very low, VLF; low, LF and high bands) parameters as well as the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFAα1) were measured.
Results
In supine position (SU), HR
SU
decreased to la larger extent (−12.
4% ± 7.
6% vs.
−3.
8% ± 4.
0%, p < 0.
001) in the “Munz Floor”® group (62.
3 ± 8.
7 vs.
54.
4 ± 7.
3 bpm, p < 0.
001, Effect Size (ES) = 0.
83) than in the control group (60.
8 ± 8.
7 vs.
58.
4 ± 8.
3 bpm, p < 0.
01, ES = 0.
27).
Significant increases in RMSSD
SU
(50.
1 ± 30.
1 vs.
73.
3 ± 48.
0 m, p < 0.
001, ES = 0.
59), HF
SU
(1,212 ± 1,078 vs.
2,672 ± 2,388 m
2
, p < 0.
001, ES = 0.
72) were reported in the Munz Floor”® but not in the control group.
In the standing position (ST): HR
ST
decreased in both the Munz Floor”® (76.
6 ± 11.
0 vs.
68.
8 ± 9.
6 bpm, p < 0.
001, ES = 0.
62) and the control (77.
2 ± 12.
7 vs.
74.
7 ± 11.
9 bpm, p < 0.
01, ES = 0.
20) but the relative change was larger in the “Munz Floor”® (−9.
6% ± 9.
4% vs.
−2.
9% ± 6.
4%, p < 0.
01).
Significant increases in RMSSD
ST
(29.
5 ± 23.
8 vs.
39.
9 ± 27.
5, p < 0.
01, ES = 0.
38) and in (LF + HF)
ST
(2,132 ± 2,464 vs.
3,065 ± 3,382 m
2
, p < 0.
01, ES = 0.
31) were observed only in the “Munz Floor”® group.
Conclusion
The “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching method was effective for acutely increasing the parasympathetic activity.
These results suggest “Munz Floor”® fascial stretching as a potential strategy for improving recovery and reducing the impact of stress and fatigue.
Related Results
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
Electronic pathogen detection (EPD) is a non - invasive, rapid, affordable, point- of- care test, for Covid 19 resulting from infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus. EPD scanning techno...
Effectiveness of Plantar Fascial Mobilization and Static Stretching on Hamstrings Flexibility among Overweight Individuals
Effectiveness of Plantar Fascial Mobilization and Static Stretching on Hamstrings Flexibility among Overweight Individuals
Background: Hamstrings tightness is commonly found among obese individuals and athletes. Many factors can result in hamstrings tightness such as overuse, bad posture and sports act...
Clinical, Autonomic & Electrophysiological Features in Patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh
Clinical, Autonomic & Electrophysiological Features in Patients with Guillain Barre Syndrome in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangladesh
Background: Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) is the most common cause of acute flaccid paralysis in the adult population. It is an acute post infectious immune mediated peripheral neu...
The Utility of COMPASS-31 Questionnaire to Predict Autonomic Dysfunction in Patients With Cervical/Upper Thoracic Compressive Myelopathy
The Utility of COMPASS-31 Questionnaire to Predict Autonomic Dysfunction in Patients With Cervical/Upper Thoracic Compressive Myelopathy
Background:
Patients with cervical/upper thoracic compressive myelopathy may have autonomic dysfunction. The composite autonomic severity score (CASS) is the gold stand...
Autonomic responses to proprioceptive and visual errors during single-trial reach adaptation
Autonomic responses to proprioceptive and visual errors during single-trial reach adaptation
Abstract
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) plays a crucial role in coordinating brain and bodily responses to cope with unexpected events. Extensive research in co...
Autonomic and Small Fiber Neuropathy in Patients with Acute Hepatic Porphyrias
Autonomic and Small Fiber Neuropathy in Patients with Acute Hepatic Porphyrias
Introductionneurovisceral pain and autonomic symptoms are the initial and most common symptoms of acute hepatic porphyrias (AHPs) attacks. These symptoms also exist in between atta...
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
(087) Why Should Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy be Included in Treatment of Vestibulodynia?
Abstract
Introduction
Vestibulodynia, vulvar pain localized to the vestibule without an identifiable cause, has a multifactorial...
The assessment of autonomic nervous function in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and its relationship with clinical characteristics
The assessment of autonomic nervous function in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and its relationship with clinical characteristics
IntroductionThe gastrointestinal tract is the organ most extensively distributed by autonomic nerves, and researches have indicated a relationship between automatic nerves and the ...

