Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Three‐Way and Four‐Way Recurrent Selection in Plant Breeding
View through CrossRef
AbstractThree or four‐way recurrent selection is proposed for the development of three or four‐way crosses. In term of genetic effects, it could be justified if there are interactions between more than three genes, whether alleles or not, if autopolyploids are also considered. For autotetraploids, in particular with tetragenic interaction, four‐way recurrent selection could be more effective than reciprocal recurrent selection (two‐way selection). According to the types of progenies used to develop the tests, different selection procedures are considered, the two extremes being called method 1 and method 3. With method 1 (selection for three or four‐way general combining ability) a plant from a population is used to produce three‐way or four‐way progenies with the other populations used as testers. With method 3 (selection for three or four‐way specific combining ability) three‐way or four‐way crosses are developed with one plant from each population. To study the genetic advance, the theory is developed to consider either diploidy or autotetraploidy. It is shown that method 3 will allow a greater genetic advance than method 1 for low heritability and low selection intensity. The way towards hybrid development with three and four‐way pedigree selection is discussed: again selection can be for general or specific three or four‐way combining ability. It is emphasized that an advantage of recurrent selection for three or four‐way specific combining ability is that it allows direct varietal development with pedigree selection on three or four‐way specific combining ability. Some other practical aspects are also considered.
Title: Three‐Way and Four‐Way Recurrent Selection in Plant Breeding
Description:
AbstractThree or four‐way recurrent selection is proposed for the development of three or four‐way crosses.
In term of genetic effects, it could be justified if there are interactions between more than three genes, whether alleles or not, if autopolyploids are also considered.
For autotetraploids, in particular with tetragenic interaction, four‐way recurrent selection could be more effective than reciprocal recurrent selection (two‐way selection).
According to the types of progenies used to develop the tests, different selection procedures are considered, the two extremes being called method 1 and method 3.
With method 1 (selection for three or four‐way general combining ability) a plant from a population is used to produce three‐way or four‐way progenies with the other populations used as testers.
With method 3 (selection for three or four‐way specific combining ability) three‐way or four‐way crosses are developed with one plant from each population.
To study the genetic advance, the theory is developed to consider either diploidy or autotetraploidy.
It is shown that method 3 will allow a greater genetic advance than method 1 for low heritability and low selection intensity.
The way towards hybrid development with three and four‐way pedigree selection is discussed: again selection can be for general or specific three or four‐way combining ability.
It is emphasized that an advantage of recurrent selection for three or four‐way specific combining ability is that it allows direct varietal development with pedigree selection on three or four‐way specific combining ability.
Some other practical aspects are also considered.
Related Results
New cycle, same old mistakes? Overlapping vs. discrete generations in long-term recurrent selection
New cycle, same old mistakes? Overlapping vs. discrete generations in long-term recurrent selection
Abstract
Background
Recurrent selection is a foundational breeding method for quantitative trait improvement. It typicall...
New cycle, same old mistakes? Overlapping vs. discrete generations in long-term recurrent selection
New cycle, same old mistakes? Overlapping vs. discrete generations in long-term recurrent selection
Abstract
Background
Recurrent selection is a foundational breeding method for quantitative trait improvement. It typically feat...
The benefits and perils of import in small cattle breeding programs
The benefits and perils of import in small cattle breeding programs
ABSTRACTSmall breeding programs are limited in achieving competitive genetic gain and prone to high rates of inbreeding. Thus, they often import genetic material to increase geneti...
Advances and Challenges in Genomic Selection for Disease Resistance
Advances and Challenges in Genomic Selection for Disease Resistance
Breeding for disease resistance is a central focus of plant breeding programs, as any successful variety must have the complete package of high yield, disease resistance, agronomic...
Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle
Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle
Abstract
Background
In national evaluations, direct genomic breeding values can be considered as correlated traits to those for which phenotypes ...
Plant breeding simulations with AlphaSimR
Plant breeding simulations with AlphaSimR
AbstractPlant breeding plays a crucial role in the development of high-performing crop varieties that meet the demands of society. Emerging breeding techniques offer the potential ...
Niche switching and leapfrog foraging: movement ecology of sympatric petrels during the early breeding season
Niche switching and leapfrog foraging: movement ecology of sympatric petrels during the early breeding season
Abstract
Background
The timing of events in the early part of the breeding season is crucially important for successful reproduction. Long-lived ani...

