Javascript must be enabled to continue!
CHALLENGES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF ONCOLYTIC VIROTHERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
View through CrossRef
Background: Oncolytic virotherapy has emerged as a novel and promising approach in cancer treatment, leveraging viruses that selectively infect and destroy malignant cells while sparing healthy tissues. Recent advancements in molecular biology and virology have enabled the development of genetically engineered viruses with enhanced tumor specificity, immune-stimulatory capacity, and safety profiles. As resistance to conventional therapies continues to pose a major clinical challenge, oncolytic viruses (OVs) offer a dual mechanism of action—direct tumor lysis and activation of antitumor immunity—placing them at the forefront of experimental oncology.
Objective: To analyze the challenges and future prospects associated with oncolytic virotherapy as a targeted cancer treatment strategy.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed databases. A total of 118 studies were initially identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 full-text, peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025 were included. Data were extracted into structured tables summarizing study design, mechanisms of action, combination therapy strategies, challenges, and future directions of oncolytic virotherapy. A risk of bias assessment was also performed to evaluate study quality.
Results: Among the 28 studies reviewed, 60% were preclinical experimental models and 40% were clinical trials. Genetic engineering was reported to significantly enhance viral specificity, safety, and immune activation. Advanced delivery systems, including nanoparticles and cell carriers, showed improved targeting and persistence. However, major limitations included immune clearance, suppressive tumor microenvironments, and systemic delivery challenges. T-VEC remains the only FDA-approved OV, but newer candidates like CVA21 and BTV-10 show promise in early trials.
Conclusion: Oncolytic virotherapy represents a rapidly evolving cancer treatment modality with significant therapeutic potential. Overcoming delivery and immunological challenges through personalized and combination-based approaches may establish OVs as a core component of future oncology practice.
Health and Research Insights
Title: CHALLENGES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF ONCOLYTIC VIROTHERAPY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Description:
Background: Oncolytic virotherapy has emerged as a novel and promising approach in cancer treatment, leveraging viruses that selectively infect and destroy malignant cells while sparing healthy tissues.
Recent advancements in molecular biology and virology have enabled the development of genetically engineered viruses with enhanced tumor specificity, immune-stimulatory capacity, and safety profiles.
As resistance to conventional therapies continues to pose a major clinical challenge, oncolytic viruses (OVs) offer a dual mechanism of action—direct tumor lysis and activation of antitumor immunity—placing them at the forefront of experimental oncology.
Objective: To analyze the challenges and future prospects associated with oncolytic virotherapy as a targeted cancer treatment strategy.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted using Google Scholar and PubMed databases.
A total of 118 studies were initially identified.
After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 28 full-text, peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2025 were included.
Data were extracted into structured tables summarizing study design, mechanisms of action, combination therapy strategies, challenges, and future directions of oncolytic virotherapy.
A risk of bias assessment was also performed to evaluate study quality.
Results: Among the 28 studies reviewed, 60% were preclinical experimental models and 40% were clinical trials.
Genetic engineering was reported to significantly enhance viral specificity, safety, and immune activation.
Advanced delivery systems, including nanoparticles and cell carriers, showed improved targeting and persistence.
However, major limitations included immune clearance, suppressive tumor microenvironments, and systemic delivery challenges.
T-VEC remains the only FDA-approved OV, but newer candidates like CVA21 and BTV-10 show promise in early trials.
Conclusion: Oncolytic virotherapy represents a rapidly evolving cancer treatment modality with significant therapeutic potential.
Overcoming delivery and immunological challenges through personalized and combination-based approaches may establish OVs as a core component of future oncology practice.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Molecular Circuits of Immune Sensing and Response to Oncolytic Virotherapy
Molecular Circuits of Immune Sensing and Response to Oncolytic Virotherapy
Oncolytic virotherapy is a promising immunotherapy approach for cancer treatment, utilizing viruses to preferentially infect and eliminate cancer cells while stimulating immune res...
Resistance Mechanisms Influencing Oncolytic Virotherapy, a Systematic Analysis
Resistance Mechanisms Influencing Oncolytic Virotherapy, a Systematic Analysis
Resistance to therapy is a frequently observed phenomenon in the treatment of cancer, and as with other cancer therapeutics, therapies based on oncolytic viruses also face the chal...
Is Oncolytic Virotherapy a permanent cure for malignant gliomas?
Is Oncolytic Virotherapy a permanent cure for malignant gliomas?
Of all malignant glioma forms, glioblastoma is the most frequently present form. The treatment of this highly aggressive tumor form by applying conventional therapies is of low suc...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Fusogenic Viruses in Oncolytic Immunotherapy
Fusogenic Viruses in Oncolytic Immunotherapy
Oncolytic viruses are under intense development and have earned their place among the novel class of cancer immunotherapeutics that are changing the face of cancer therapy. Their a...
Oncolytic virotherapy evolved into the fourth generation as tumor immunotherapy
Oncolytic virotherapy evolved into the fourth generation as tumor immunotherapy
Abstract
Background
Oncolytic virotherapy (OVT) is a promising anti-tumor modality that utilizes oncolytic viruses (OVs) to preferentially attack ca...
Abstract 1734: In vivo immunomodulatory effects by uPAR-retargeted oncolytic Measles virus
Abstract 1734: In vivo immunomodulatory effects by uPAR-retargeted oncolytic Measles virus
Abstract
Background: Oncolytic viruses offer an advantage over other treatment options, as they both induce cytotoxicity as well as immune modulation. Oncolytic meas...

