Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Safety and Immunogenicity of Nanocovax, a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Vaccine
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Background
Nanocovax is a recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 subunit vaccine composed of full-length prefusion stabilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins (S-2P) and aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.
Methods
We conducted a dose-escalation, open label trial (phase 1) and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (phase 2) to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the Nanocovax vaccine (in 25 microgram (mcg), 50 mcg, and 75 mcg doses, aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted). In phase 1, 60 participants received two intramuscular injection of the vaccine following dose-escalation procedure. The primary outcomes were reactogenicity and laboratory tests to evaluate the vaccine safety. In phase 2 which involved in 560 healthy adults, the primary outcomes are vaccine safety; and anti-S IgG antibody response. Secondary outcomes were surrogate virus neutralization, wild-type SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, and T-cell responses by intracellular staining (ICS) for interferon gamma (IFNg). We performed primary analyses at day 35 and day 42.
Results
For phase 1 study, no serious adverse events (SAE) were observed for all 60 participants. Most adverse events (AE) were grade 1 and disappeared shortly after injection. For phase 2 study, after randomization, 480 participants were assigned to receive the vaccine with adjuvant, and 80 participants were assigned to receive placebo. Reactogenicity was absent or mild in the majority of participants and of short duration (mean, ≤3 days). Unsolicited adverse events were mild in most participants. There were no serious adverse events related to Nanocovax. Regarding the immunogenicity, Nanocovax induced robust anti-S antibody responses. There was no statistical difference in antibody responses among dose strengths on Day 42, in terms of anti S-IgG level and neutralizing antibody titer.
Conclusions
Up to 42 days, Nanocovax vaccine was safe, well tolerated and induced robust immune responses. We propose using Nanocovax 25 mcg for Phase 3 to evaluate the vaccine efficacy. (Research funded by Nanogen Pharmaceutical Biotechnology JSC., and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam;
ClinicalTrials.gov
number,
NCT04683484
.)
openRxiv
Thuy P. Nguyen
Quyet Do
Lan T. Phan
Duc V. Dinh
Hiep Khong
Luong V. Hoang
Thuong V. Nguyen
Hung N. Pham
Men V. Chu
Toan T. Nguyen
Tri M. Le
N.T. Tuyen
Thanh T. Dinh
Thuong V. Vo
Thao T. Vu
Quynh B.P. Nguyen
Vuong T. Phan
Luong V. Nguyen
Giang T. Nguyen
Phong M. Tran
Thuan D. Nghiem
Tien V. Tran
Tien G. Nguyen
Tuynh Q. Tran
Linh T. Nguyen
Anh T. Do
Dung D. Nguyen
Son A. Ho
Viet T. Nguyen
Dung T. Pham
Hieu B. Tran
Son T. Vu
Su X. Tran
Trung M. Do
Ton Tran
Thang M. Cao
Huy M. Dao
Thao T.T. Nguyen
Uyen Y Doan
Vy T.T. Le
Linh P. Tran
Ngoc M. Nguyen
Ngoc T. Nguyen
Hang T.T. Pham
Quan H. Nguyen
Hieu T. Nguyen
Hung T. Trinh
Hang L.K. Nguyen
Vinh T. Tran
Mai T.N. Tran
Truc T.T. Nguyen
Phat T. Ha
Hieu T. Huynh
Khanh D. Nguyen
Chung C. Doan
Si M. Do
Title: Safety and Immunogenicity of Nanocovax, a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Vaccine
Description:
ABSTRACT
Background
Nanocovax is a recombinant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 subunit vaccine composed of full-length prefusion stabilized recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins (S-2P) and aluminum hydroxide adjuvant.
Methods
We conducted a dose-escalation, open label trial (phase 1) and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (phase 2) to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the Nanocovax vaccine (in 25 microgram (mcg), 50 mcg, and 75 mcg doses, aluminum hydroxide adjuvanted).
In phase 1, 60 participants received two intramuscular injection of the vaccine following dose-escalation procedure.
The primary outcomes were reactogenicity and laboratory tests to evaluate the vaccine safety.
In phase 2 which involved in 560 healthy adults, the primary outcomes are vaccine safety; and anti-S IgG antibody response.
Secondary outcomes were surrogate virus neutralization, wild-type SARS-CoV-2 neutralization, and T-cell responses by intracellular staining (ICS) for interferon gamma (IFNg).
We performed primary analyses at day 35 and day 42.
Results
For phase 1 study, no serious adverse events (SAE) were observed for all 60 participants.
Most adverse events (AE) were grade 1 and disappeared shortly after injection.
For phase 2 study, after randomization, 480 participants were assigned to receive the vaccine with adjuvant, and 80 participants were assigned to receive placebo.
Reactogenicity was absent or mild in the majority of participants and of short duration (mean, ≤3 days).
Unsolicited adverse events were mild in most participants.
There were no serious adverse events related to Nanocovax.
Regarding the immunogenicity, Nanocovax induced robust anti-S antibody responses.
There was no statistical difference in antibody responses among dose strengths on Day 42, in terms of anti S-IgG level and neutralizing antibody titer.
Conclusions
Up to 42 days, Nanocovax vaccine was safe, well tolerated and induced robust immune responses.
We propose using Nanocovax 25 mcg for Phase 3 to evaluate the vaccine efficacy.
(Research funded by Nanogen Pharmaceutical Biotechnology JSC.
, and the Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam;
ClinicalTrials.
gov
number,
NCT04683484
.
).
Related Results
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
The Potential of Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds in the Fight Against COVID-19
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus , is causing a serious worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of strains with rapid spread and...
Analyses of the Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronaviruses
Analyses of the Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronaviruses
Aim: To analyze spike proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-related coronaviruses (CoVs) for their conserved motifs, Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD), Receptor Binding...
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
The Hidden Problem of Cross-Reactivity: Challenges in HIV Testing During the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) surface glycoproteins, including shared epitope motifs, sho...
Modeling Coronavirus Spike Protein Dynamics: Implications for Immunogenicity and Immune Escape
Modeling Coronavirus Spike Protein Dynamics: Implications for Immunogenicity and Immune Escape
ABSTRACT
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is a global public health emergency requiring urgent development of efficacious vaccines. While concentrated research efforts...
Mutations in SARS-CoV
Mutations in SARS-CoV
The coronavirus family is named for the large spike protein molecules found
on the pathogen exterior, which give the virus a crown-like appearance, the coronavirus
genome is the bi...
Kinetics of the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: comparative analytical performance of seven commercial serology tests
Kinetics of the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2: comparative analytical performance of seven commercial serology tests
Abstract
Background
SARS-CoV-2 serology tests are clinically useful to document a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with n...
SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein-reactive T cells can be readily expanded from COVID-19 vaccinated donors
SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein-reactive T cells can be readily expanded from COVID-19 vaccinated donors
Abstract
Introduction
The COVID-19 vaccine was designed to provide protection against infection by the sev...
P-074 Evaluation of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on semen quality, sex hormones, and pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
P-074 Evaluation of the impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on semen quality, sex hormones, and pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Study question
Does the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine adversely affect semen quality, sex hormones, and pregnancy outcomes?
...

