Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy are similarly beneficial for five-year overall survival in locally advanced gastric cancer patients
View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundDifferent types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens have been compared for gastric cancer, mostly in terms of radiological downgrading or pathological tumor regression; however, no large-scale multicenter RCT study has conducted a head-to-head comparison of the overall survival rate between perioperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) and postoperative or adjuvant chemotherapy(AC). We explored whether the five-year overall survival rate was greater in patients who received perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery than in those who underwent surgery first and then had postoperative chemotherapy.MethodsAltogether, 77 patients with a clinical diagnosis of cTNM stage III were included. Five-year overall survival rates (OS) were compared between patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery (NAC) and patients who underwent surgery first plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for the disparity between the two groups. A Kaplan‒Meier plot was created for survival analysis, and the log rank method was used to compare the difference in OS.ResultsA total of 34 patients were in the NAC group, and 43 patients were in the AC group. There was no significant difference in age (median 64 vs. 66 years), cTNM staging, or extent of gastrectomy between the two groups (p<0.05).The median follow-up time was 58 months (range of 53-65 months). The five-year overall survival (OS) rates for the patients in the NAC group and AC group were 61.8% and 73.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the five-year overall survival rates (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the severity grading of postoperative complications between the two groups (p>0.05).ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the five-year overall survival rate between the patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery and those who underwent surgery first plus postoperative chemotherapy. A well-controlled prospective study is necessary to reconfirm whether perioperative chemotherapy is superior to postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Title: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy are similarly beneficial for five-year overall survival in locally advanced gastric cancer patients
Description:
AbstractBackgroundDifferent types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens have been compared for gastric cancer, mostly in terms of radiological downgrading or pathological tumor regression; however, no large-scale multicenter RCT study has conducted a head-to-head comparison of the overall survival rate between perioperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy(NAC) and postoperative or adjuvant chemotherapy(AC).
We explored whether the five-year overall survival rate was greater in patients who received perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery than in those who underwent surgery first and then had postoperative chemotherapy.
MethodsAltogether, 77 patients with a clinical diagnosis of cTNM stage III were included.
Five-year overall survival rates (OS) were compared between patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery (NAC) and patients who underwent surgery first plus adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).
Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for the disparity between the two groups.
A Kaplan‒Meier plot was created for survival analysis, and the log rank method was used to compare the difference in OS.
ResultsA total of 34 patients were in the NAC group, and 43 patients were in the AC group.
There was no significant difference in age (median 64 vs.
66 years), cTNM staging, or extent of gastrectomy between the two groups (p<0.
05).
The median follow-up time was 58 months (range of 53-65 months).
The five-year overall survival (OS) rates for the patients in the NAC group and AC group were 61.
8% and 73.
5%, respectively.
There was no significant difference between the two groups in the five-year overall survival rates (p>0.
05).
There was no significant difference in the severity grading of postoperative complications between the two groups (p>0.
05).
ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in the five-year overall survival rate between the patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery and those who underwent surgery first plus postoperative chemotherapy.
A well-controlled prospective study is necessary to reconfirm whether perioperative chemotherapy is superior to postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients.
Related Results
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Objectives:
To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
...
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.
Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of Borrmann type IV gastric cancer.
e16064 Background: Borrmann type IV gastric cancer is highly malignant and prone to peritoneal metastasis, including peritoneal dissemination (P1) and positive peritoneal cytology...
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Surgery versus Direct Surgery in Senile Patients with with Gastric Cancer: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Surgery versus Direct Surgery in Senile Patients with with Gastric Cancer: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Background
Despite the lack of decisive research advocating neoadjuvant chemotherapy there is a broad consensus that it is beneficial for gastric cancer in terms ...
The impact of peri-operative chemotherapy on the outcomes of patients with non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.
The impact of peri-operative chemotherapy on the outcomes of patients with non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.
563 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis and outcome despite therapy. It accounts for 2.2% of all new cancer cases and 5% of all cancer deaths. ...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy is similarly beneficial for five-year overall survival in locally advanced gastric cancer patients
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy is similarly beneficial for five-year overall survival in locally advanced gastric cancer patients
Abstract
Background: Different types of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens have been compared for gastric cancer, mostly in terms of radiological downgrading or pathological...
Abstract P1-13-11: Optimal omission of anthracycline in adjuvant chemotherapy of HER2 positive breast cancer
Abstract P1-13-11: Optimal omission of anthracycline in adjuvant chemotherapy of HER2 positive breast cancer
Abstract
[Background]In adjuvant settings of HER2 positive cancer, trastuzumab has been shown to be effective in combination with anthracycline- based chemotherapy f...

