There is Something About Affirming SALL: An Everhard and Gardner and Miller Review

This article reviews Everhard’s (2022) response to Gardner and Miller (2021), which included her position on the evolution and growth of self-access language learning (SALL), her reflections on Gardner and Miller’s (1999) seminal self-access handbook, and the possible futures of SALL. I concur with Everhard and her response to Gardner and Miller (1999; 2021) that the future success of self-access learning centers (SALCs) is uncertain because of technological advances in learning spaces and materials. Moreover, Everhard and Gardner and Miller (2021) noted a trend of reappropriating SALC spaces for other academic projects and uses of the structures. However, I also agree with Everhard and Gardner and Miller (2021) that there is something about SALL; it may not be the same as we know it in the future. The reason is that SALL adapts to its users, so SALCs will most likely survive if their institutions support them. However, there will undoubtedly be more automatized services and fewer faculty and staff to support learners.