Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Cancer Incidence in People With Intellectual Disability and Down Syndrome in Australia: A Cohort Study

View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT Objective There is inconsistent data on cancer risk in people with intellectual disability. Our primary objective was to compare the incidence of cancer in people with and without intellectual disability. Methods and Analysis A cohort study using linked population‐based administrative and cancer registry data in New South Wales, Australia 2001–2018. We compared the incidence of cancer in people with intellectual disability and a comparator group without intellectual disability matched for age, sex and residential postcode. We also compared cancer incidence in people with Down syndrome and people with intellectual disability without Down syndrome. We used a flexible parametric survival model accounting for competing risks. Results People with intellectual disability had a slightly higher risk of developing any cancer (sub‐hazard ratio, SHR 1.07 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.12]) compared to those without intellectual disability. An increased risk was evident in the 0–14 year (SHR 2.19, 95% CI 1.85 to 2.59) and 15–49 year (SHR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.46) age groups, and a decreased risk was observed for those aged 50 years and above (SHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.98). People with intellectual disability had a higher risk of colorectal cancer (SHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.51) and a lower risk of prostate cancer (SHR 0.45, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.53) and melanoma (SHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88). People with Down syndrome had a significantly higher risk of childhood cancer (SHR 7.94, 95% CI 5.72 to 11.04) compared to those with other intellectual disability, and a similar risk as an adult. Conclusions These findings underscore the need for targeted health promotion campaigns and, for adults, customised cancer screening programmes to improve access, acceptability and outcomes for people with intellectual disability.
Title: Cancer Incidence in People With Intellectual Disability and Down Syndrome in Australia: A Cohort Study
Description:
ABSTRACT Objective There is inconsistent data on cancer risk in people with intellectual disability.
Our primary objective was to compare the incidence of cancer in people with and without intellectual disability.
Methods and Analysis A cohort study using linked population‐based administrative and cancer registry data in New South Wales, Australia 2001–2018.
We compared the incidence of cancer in people with intellectual disability and a comparator group without intellectual disability matched for age, sex and residential postcode.
We also compared cancer incidence in people with Down syndrome and people with intellectual disability without Down syndrome.
We used a flexible parametric survival model accounting for competing risks.
Results People with intellectual disability had a slightly higher risk of developing any cancer (sub‐hazard ratio, SHR 1.
07 [95% CI 1.
03 to 1.
12]) compared to those without intellectual disability.
An increased risk was evident in the 0–14 year (SHR 2.
19, 95% CI 1.
85 to 2.
59) and 15–49 year (SHR 1.
34, 95% CI 1.
23 to 1.
46) age groups, and a decreased risk was observed for those aged 50 years and above (SHR 0.
93, 95% CI 0.
88 to 0.
98).
People with intellectual disability had a higher risk of colorectal cancer (SHR 1.
32, 95% CI 1.
15 to 1.
51) and a lower risk of prostate cancer (SHR 0.
45, 95% CI 0.
38 to 0.
53) and melanoma (SHR 0.
75, 95% CI 0.
64 to 0.
88).
People with Down syndrome had a significantly higher risk of childhood cancer (SHR 7.
94, 95% CI 5.
72 to 11.
04) compared to those with other intellectual disability, and a similar risk as an adult.
Conclusions These findings underscore the need for targeted health promotion campaigns and, for adults, customised cancer screening programmes to improve access, acceptability and outcomes for people with intellectual disability.

Related Results

GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
GEOINFORMATION FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT 2020 (GI4DM2020): PREFACE
Abstract. Across the world, nature-triggered disasters fuelled by climate change are worsening. Some two billion people have been affected by the consequences of natural hazards ov...
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
“The Earth Is Dying, Bro”
Climate Change and Children Australian children are uniquely situated in a vast landscape that varies drastically across locations. Spanning multiple climatic zones—from cool tempe...
Disability Studies
Disability Studies
This article brings together key texts and theorists from disability studies, which is a growing and vibrant inter/multidisciplinary field. It is an area of inquiry that has been e...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...

Back to Top