Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Flap transfer for traumatic defects of the upper extremity: experience of 35 cases

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background Despite advances in microsurgical techniques of flap transfer, complex upper extremity trauma reconstruction remains a challenge for surgeons. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients undergoing subacute upper extremity flap reconstruction, including flap choices, complications and success of flap reconstructions. Results Thirty-five patients underwent free flap procedures, including 24 anterolateral thigh flaps (68.57%), five latissimus dorsi flaps (14.29%) and six lateral arm flaps (17.14%). Flap sizes ranged from 3 × 4 to 33 × 11 cm 2 . The mean time of flap reconstruction was 14 days (range 5–29). Two flaps developed partial necrosis, both of which were later treated with skin-grafting. Traumatic wound infections occurred in three patients. All upper limb trauma was completely covered. Conclusions All three types of skin flaps used to reconstruct severe upper limb soft tissue defects achieved satisfactory function and appearance with negligible complications and low amputation rates during the subacute period.
Title: Flap transfer for traumatic defects of the upper extremity: experience of 35 cases
Description:
Abstract Background Despite advances in microsurgical techniques of flap transfer, complex upper extremity trauma reconstruction remains a challenge for surgeons.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from patients undergoing subacute upper extremity flap reconstruction, including flap choices, complications and success of flap reconstructions.
Results Thirty-five patients underwent free flap procedures, including 24 anterolateral thigh flaps (68.
57%), five latissimus dorsi flaps (14.
29%) and six lateral arm flaps (17.
14%).
Flap sizes ranged from 3 × 4 to 33 × 11 cm 2 .
The mean time of flap reconstruction was 14 days (range 5–29).
Two flaps developed partial necrosis, both of which were later treated with skin-grafting.
Traumatic wound infections occurred in three patients.
All upper limb trauma was completely covered.
Conclusions All three types of skin flaps used to reconstruct severe upper limb soft tissue defects achieved satisfactory function and appearance with negligible complications and low amputation rates during the subacute period.

Related Results

Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Subacute reconstruction using flap transfer for complex defects of the upper extremity
Subacute reconstruction using flap transfer for complex defects of the upper extremity
Abstract Background Despite advances in microsurgical techniques of flap transfer, complex upper extremity trauma reconstruction remains a challenge for surgeons. This stud...
Oral Cancer and Reconstruction: A Serial Case Report
Oral Cancer and Reconstruction: A Serial Case Report
Introduction : The head and neck cancer are sixth most common cancers worldwide with cancer of oral cavity. The basic treatment modality for the carcinoma of oral cavity has been s...
Anterior Ear Reconstruction with the Posterior Pull-through Flap
Anterior Ear Reconstruction with the Posterior Pull-through Flap
Background: Defects of the central ear after skin cancer removal remain a common problem for the reconstructive surgeon. The experience with a one-stage, postauricular,...
Dual Free Flap Reconstruction: A Configuration-Based Algorithm Using Parallel and Serial Designs
Dual Free Flap Reconstruction: A Configuration-Based Algorithm Using Parallel and Serial Designs
BackgroundIn severe trauma, extensive or geometrically complex soft-tissue defects often exceed the capacity of a single free flap. Dual free flaps offer a versatile solution, yet ...
UPPER EYELID RECONSTRUCTION SURGERIES; COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN REVERSE TENZEL FLAP VERSUS CUTLER BEARD FLAP PROCEDURE
UPPER EYELID RECONSTRUCTION SURGERIES; COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES BETWEEN REVERSE TENZEL FLAP VERSUS CUTLER BEARD FLAP PROCEDURE
Background: Objective of this study was to compare Reverse Tenzel flap and Cutler Beard flap for upper eyelid defects. Methods: This interventional study was carried out at occulop...

Back to Top