Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The Modern Paradigm of Justice: Challenges of the Time

View through CrossRef
The future of modern justice is based on the idea of its anthropocentricity, according to which the center of application of any state activity is a person. The main ideas that make up the vector of the development of modern justice, discussed in the world community, are the focus of the courts on reducing conflicts in society, extending the state's services to the judicial sphere, digitalizing the process of administering justice, including using the capabilities of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology in judicial activity. A worldwide trend that has been widely developed in recent decades is the development of compromise methods for resolving legal conflicts, which involves the development of pre-trial mechanisms for resolving disputes, the expansion of alternative methods for resolving criminal cases of crimes that do not pose a great public danger, and the development of mediation. An important role in this should be assigned to the court, which informs the population about the possibilities for resolving disputes, and also creates the necessary prerequisites for resolving them. The paradigm of modern justice is changing before our eyes: the traditional approaches to justice are being replaced by its understanding as a state service for resolving legal disputes (which is the main part of justice), which must meet the requirements of accessibility, speed and quality. The state can provide this service independently through the functioning of the judicial system or delegate part of the authority for its implementation to private entities (commercial arbitration, arbitration courts, public courts. In the context of technologicalization of society, the philosophy of justice is transformed from ritualism and ritualism to convenience and accessibility. IT-technologies in justice and judicial management, smart courts, artificial intelligence, blockchain in judicial activity have become realities in the judicial systems of many countries Artificial intelligence does not replace the court, but is an auxiliary tool for administering justice. Programs developed on the basis of artificial intelligence help the court decide. Blockchain allows you to quickly integrate large amounts of data with low costs, can be used to track the arrest of property and securities, personal identification and digital identification of legal entities, drives, arrests, convictions, offenses, property, wills, licensing, etc. The future is in fast, high-tech, high-quality and affordable justice.
Russian State University of Justice
Title: The Modern Paradigm of Justice: Challenges of the Time
Description:
The future of modern justice is based on the idea of its anthropocentricity, according to which the center of application of any state activity is a person.
The main ideas that make up the vector of the development of modern justice, discussed in the world community, are the focus of the courts on reducing conflicts in society, extending the state's services to the judicial sphere, digitalizing the process of administering justice, including using the capabilities of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology in judicial activity.
A worldwide trend that has been widely developed in recent decades is the development of compromise methods for resolving legal conflicts, which involves the development of pre-trial mechanisms for resolving disputes, the expansion of alternative methods for resolving criminal cases of crimes that do not pose a great public danger, and the development of mediation.
An important role in this should be assigned to the court, which informs the population about the possibilities for resolving disputes, and also creates the necessary prerequisites for resolving them.
The paradigm of modern justice is changing before our eyes: the traditional approaches to justice are being replaced by its understanding as a state service for resolving legal disputes (which is the main part of justice), which must meet the requirements of accessibility, speed and quality.
The state can provide this service independently through the functioning of the judicial system or delegate part of the authority for its implementation to private entities (commercial arbitration, arbitration courts, public courts.
In the context of technologicalization of society, the philosophy of justice is transformed from ritualism and ritualism to convenience and accessibility.
IT-technologies in justice and judicial management, smart courts, artificial intelligence, blockchain in judicial activity have become realities in the judicial systems of many countries Artificial intelligence does not replace the court, but is an auxiliary tool for administering justice.
Programs developed on the basis of artificial intelligence help the court decide.
Blockchain allows you to quickly integrate large amounts of data with low costs, can be used to track the arrest of property and securities, personal identification and digital identification of legal entities, drives, arrests, convictions, offenses, property, wills, licensing, etc.
The future is in fast, high-tech, high-quality and affordable justice.

Related Results

Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...
Restorative Justice in Youth and Adult Criminal Justice
Restorative Justice in Youth and Adult Criminal Justice
Restorative justice is an innovative justice response to crime and offending that takes many forms such as victim-offender meetings, family group conferencing and youth justice con...
Justice paysanne
Justice paysanne
En anthropologie juridique, le terme « justice paysanne » renvoie à l’une des expressions du pluralisme juridique, entendu comme l’existence d’une pluralité d’ordres normatifs, de ...
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Experiences, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy Enhancement for Social Justice-Oriented Faculty
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Experiences, Barriers, and Self-Efficacy Enhancement for Social Justice-Oriented Faculty
Although a commitment to social justice is central to the identity of counseling psychologists, little is known about how faculty contribute to a culture of social justice. The cur...
Urgensi Pengaturan Justice Collaborator dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana di Indonesia
Urgensi Pengaturan Justice Collaborator dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana di Indonesia
Abstract. This study examines the urgency of regulating justice collaborators in premeditated murder crimes in Indonesia. justice collaborators are willing to cooperate with law en...
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
This Campbell systematic review assesses the direct and indirect benefits of public police interventions that use procedurally just dialogue. The review summarises findings from 30...
Queering the Courts
Queering the Courts
<p><strong>Takatāpui/LGBTQ+/queer people can face increased victimisation (Ministry of Justice, 2022b) and criminalisation (Mogul, Ritchie, & Whitlock, 2011), altho...

Back to Top