Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract P3-09-02: The HER2 –positive subtypes by stage and race/ethnicity
View through CrossRef
Abstract
HER2-positivity is often associated with poor survival. The purpose of this study is to determine if there are differences in mortality among the HER-positive subtypes when stratified by stage and race/ethnicity.
Methods: Using the California Cancer Registry for years 2000–2010, we examined 99,897 cases of stages 1–3 ER+/PR+/HER2− and all HER2-positive first primary female invasive breast cancers. Race/ethnicity was defined as white, black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API). Kaplan-Meier (KM) and the Log-Rank test were used to compute 6-year survival. Cox proportional hazards was used to assess the risk of mortality of each of the HER2-positive subtypes when compared with the ER+/PR+/HER2− subtype (the most common subtype). All analyses were adjusted for age, grade, year of diagnosis (<2007, 2007+), and socioeconomic status and run separately by race for stages 1, 2, and 3.
Results: For all stages combined, of the subtypes comprising the luminal B-HER2 positive category, the ER+/PR+/HER2+ had the best survival (85%), only 2% less than the ER+/PR+/HER2−.
When compared with the ER+/PR+/HER2− subtype, no difference in KM survival was noted for stage 1 luminal B (ER+/PR+/HER2+;ER+/PR−/HER2+; ER−/PR+/HER2+). Both had 90% 72-month survival. The ER−/PR−/HER2+ had 88% survival (p < 0.02).
For stage 2, luminal B had 83% survival and ER−/PR−/HER2+ had 76% survival. Both were significantly different (p < 0.001) from the ER+/PR+/HER2− subtype (86%).
The luminal B had 68% survival and the ER−/PR−/HER2+ had 55% survival for stage 3. Both were statistically significantly worse (p <.006) than the ER+/PR+/HER2− (72%).
Adjusted mortality for the ER+/PR+/HER2+ was only increased for blacks in stage 1 (HR = 1.59; 95%CI=1.09–2.33). Mortality for the ER−/PR−/HER2+ was increased for whites in all stages; for blacks in stages 1 (HR = 1.82; 95%CI=1.11–3.00) and 3 (HR = 1.90; 95%CI=1.36–2.66); for Hispanics in stages 2 (HR = 1.58; 95%CI=1.28–1.95) and 3 (HR = 2.19; 95%CI=1.73–2.78); and APIs only in stage 2 (HR = 1.70; 95%CI=1.31–2.19)
Year of diagnosis made no difference in risk of mortality in stage 1 for any race. For stage 2, blacks had slightly reduced mortality if diagnosed in 2007 or later, and for stage 3, all races except blacks had reduced risk of mortality when diagnosed in 2007 or later.
Conclusions: 1. There is variation in survival among the luminal B-HER2 positive subtypes.2. The driving force behind the increased mortality of the HER2 positive subtype is the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtype, the molecularly defined HER2 overexpressing subtype.3. Year of diagnosis does not influence survival in stage 1 for any race.4. There are differences in mortality among the HER2 positive subtypes when stratifying by stage and race and adjusting for age, grade, year of diagnosis, and SES.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-02.
Title: Abstract P3-09-02: The HER2 –positive subtypes by stage and race/ethnicity
Description:
Abstract
HER2-positivity is often associated with poor survival.
The purpose of this study is to determine if there are differences in mortality among the HER-positive subtypes when stratified by stage and race/ethnicity.
Methods: Using the California Cancer Registry for years 2000–2010, we examined 99,897 cases of stages 1–3 ER+/PR+/HER2− and all HER2-positive first primary female invasive breast cancers.
Race/ethnicity was defined as white, black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander (API).
Kaplan-Meier (KM) and the Log-Rank test were used to compute 6-year survival.
Cox proportional hazards was used to assess the risk of mortality of each of the HER2-positive subtypes when compared with the ER+/PR+/HER2− subtype (the most common subtype).
All analyses were adjusted for age, grade, year of diagnosis (<2007, 2007+), and socioeconomic status and run separately by race for stages 1, 2, and 3.
Results: For all stages combined, of the subtypes comprising the luminal B-HER2 positive category, the ER+/PR+/HER2+ had the best survival (85%), only 2% less than the ER+/PR+/HER2−.
When compared with the ER+/PR+/HER2− subtype, no difference in KM survival was noted for stage 1 luminal B (ER+/PR+/HER2+;ER+/PR−/HER2+; ER−/PR+/HER2+).
Both had 90% 72-month survival.
The ER−/PR−/HER2+ had 88% survival (p < 0.
02).
For stage 2, luminal B had 83% survival and ER−/PR−/HER2+ had 76% survival.
Both were significantly different (p < 0.
001) from the ER+/PR+/HER2− subtype (86%).
The luminal B had 68% survival and the ER−/PR−/HER2+ had 55% survival for stage 3.
Both were statistically significantly worse (p <.
006) than the ER+/PR+/HER2− (72%).
Adjusted mortality for the ER+/PR+/HER2+ was only increased for blacks in stage 1 (HR = 1.
59; 95%CI=1.
09–2.
33).
Mortality for the ER−/PR−/HER2+ was increased for whites in all stages; for blacks in stages 1 (HR = 1.
82; 95%CI=1.
11–3.
00) and 3 (HR = 1.
90; 95%CI=1.
36–2.
66); for Hispanics in stages 2 (HR = 1.
58; 95%CI=1.
28–1.
95) and 3 (HR = 2.
19; 95%CI=1.
73–2.
78); and APIs only in stage 2 (HR = 1.
70; 95%CI=1.
31–2.
19)
Year of diagnosis made no difference in risk of mortality in stage 1 for any race.
For stage 2, blacks had slightly reduced mortality if diagnosed in 2007 or later, and for stage 3, all races except blacks had reduced risk of mortality when diagnosed in 2007 or later.
Conclusions: 1.
There is variation in survival among the luminal B-HER2 positive subtypes.
2.
The driving force behind the increased mortality of the HER2 positive subtype is the ER−/PR−/HER2+ subtype, the molecularly defined HER2 overexpressing subtype.
3.
Year of diagnosis does not influence survival in stage 1 for any race.
4.
There are differences in mortality among the HER2 positive subtypes when stratifying by stage and race and adjusting for age, grade, year of diagnosis, and SES.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-09-02.
Related Results
HER2-positive Apocrine Carcinoma of the Breast: A population-based Analysis of Treatment and Outcome
HER2-positive Apocrine Carcinoma of the Breast: A population-based Analysis of Treatment and Outcome
Abstract
Aims
Apocrine carcinoma of the breast (APO) expresses HER2 in 30-50% of cases. This study explored the clinicopathological features and outcome of HER2+ APO (HER2...
Abstract 2271: bcl-2 expression in HER2-positive breast carcinoma subtypes
Abstract 2271: bcl-2 expression in HER2-positive breast carcinoma subtypes
Abstract
Background: HER2-positive breast cancers comprise 20-30% of all breast cancers; amplification of HER2 confers a poorer prognosis. While treatment with anti-...
Abstract 1836: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models expressing HER2 reflect clinical responses to targeted HER2 inhibition
Abstract 1836: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models expressing HER2 reflect clinical responses to targeted HER2 inhibition
Abstract
Background While HER2-directed agents are most often used for treating breast cancer, there is increasing evidence that these therapies may be of value in o...
STUDY ON HER2 STATUS AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA
STUDY ON HER2 STATUS AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA
Background: To select patients with targeted breast cancer need to accurately determine the status of HER2 gene amplification. Therefore, HER2 gene amplification should be determin...
Functional analysis of a putative HER2-associated expressed enhancer, Her2- Enhancer1, in breast cancer cells
Functional analysis of a putative HER2-associated expressed enhancer, Her2- Enhancer1, in breast cancer cells
Abstract
HER-2/neu (HER2) is a member of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) family, encoding a protein with tyrosine kinase activity. Following the gene amplification...
Functional analysis of a putative HER2-associated expressed enhancer, Her2-Enhancer1, in breast cancer cells
Functional analysis of a putative HER2-associated expressed enhancer, Her2-Enhancer1, in breast cancer cells
AbstractHER-2/neu (HER2) is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptors family, encoding a protein with tyrosine kinase activity. Following the gene amplification or increase...
Abstract BL-1: Brinker Award Lecture: How Does HER2 Contribute to Breast Cancer Progression?
Abstract BL-1: Brinker Award Lecture: How Does HER2 Contribute to Breast Cancer Progression?
Abstract
HER2 (also called NEU and ERBB2), a receptor tyrosine kinase frequently overexpressed in breast cancer, is one of the most oncogenic kinases of the human ki...
A gene expression-based classifier for HER2-low breast cancer
A gene expression-based classifier for HER2-low breast cancer
AbstractIn clinical trials evaluating antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs), HER2-low breast cancer is defined through protein immunohistochemistry scoring (IHC) 1+ or 2+ without gene a...

