Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Nonignorable censoring in randomized clinical trials

View through CrossRef
Background In a clinical trial, survival may be censored by the end of the study, especially for subjects who enter later in the enrollment period. If there is a trend toward better survival over time then longer survivors experience shorter censoring times (heavier censoring). In such a case, the censoring and survival times are correlated, and thus the censoring is nonignorable in the sense that standard survival models that assume independent censoring could yield incorrect inferences. We will demonstrate a graphical method for analyzing sensitivity of estimates of survival model parameters to small departures from nonignorable censoring. Methods We assume a parametric model of survival together with a scaled beta model for the censoring process that incorporates the dependence of censoring time on survival time. We assess sensitivity using an index of local sensitivity to nonignorability (Troxel et al. [1]). High sensitivity indicates a large impact of nonignorable censoring on the parameter of interest and a need for additional modeling. Results A simulation study shows that the approach is valid for practical use. We apply our method to a clinical trial evaluating the survival benefit of a surgically implanted left ventricular assist device in subjects with end-stage heart failure. Sensitivity is somewhat larger in estimates of the mean survival in the device arm, where survival is better and the fraction censored is therefore larger. The degree of nonignorability required to substantially affect estimates is larger than seems plausible, however. Conclusions Our results illustrate how one can apply sensitivity analysis to evaluate the reliability of survival parameter estimates in a clinical trial.
Title: Nonignorable censoring in randomized clinical trials
Description:
Background In a clinical trial, survival may be censored by the end of the study, especially for subjects who enter later in the enrollment period.
If there is a trend toward better survival over time then longer survivors experience shorter censoring times (heavier censoring).
In such a case, the censoring and survival times are correlated, and thus the censoring is nonignorable in the sense that standard survival models that assume independent censoring could yield incorrect inferences.
We will demonstrate a graphical method for analyzing sensitivity of estimates of survival model parameters to small departures from nonignorable censoring.
Methods We assume a parametric model of survival together with a scaled beta model for the censoring process that incorporates the dependence of censoring time on survival time.
We assess sensitivity using an index of local sensitivity to nonignorability (Troxel et al.
[1]).
High sensitivity indicates a large impact of nonignorable censoring on the parameter of interest and a need for additional modeling.
Results A simulation study shows that the approach is valid for practical use.
We apply our method to a clinical trial evaluating the survival benefit of a surgically implanted left ventricular assist device in subjects with end-stage heart failure.
Sensitivity is somewhat larger in estimates of the mean survival in the device arm, where survival is better and the fraction censored is therefore larger.
The degree of nonignorability required to substantially affect estimates is larger than seems plausible, however.
Conclusions Our results illustrate how one can apply sensitivity analysis to evaluate the reliability of survival parameter estimates in a clinical trial.

Related Results

Dealing with censoring in a network meta-analysis of time-to-event data
Dealing with censoring in a network meta-analysis of time-to-event data
Background The Health Technology Assessment agencies typically require an economic evaluation considering a lifetime horizon for interventions affecting surviva...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Correcting Nonignorable Nonresponse Bias in Turnout Estimation Using Callback Data
Correcting Nonignorable Nonresponse Bias in Turnout Estimation Using Callback Data
Abstract Overestimation of turnout has long been an issue in election surveys, with nonresponse bias or voter overrepresentation identified as major sources of bi...
Conformal predictive intervals in survival analysis: a resampling approach
Conformal predictive intervals in survival analysis: a resampling approach
ABSTRACT The distribution-free method of conformal prediction has gained considerable attention in computer science, machine learning, and statistics. Candès et al. ...
Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms
Clinical trials for predictive medicine: new challenges and paradigms
Background Developments in biotechnology and genomics have increased the focus of biostatisticians on prediction problems. This has led to many exciting developments for predictive...

Back to Top