Javascript must be enabled to continue!
John Rawls
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This collection of original essays explores major areas of debate inspired by the political philosophy of John Rawls. The volume is divided into ten parts, exploring ten distinct questions: Can Rawls’s conception of public reason offer determinate answers to major questions of justice? Is ideal theory useful or relevant to resolving issues of justice in the nonideal world? Are libertarians correct to criticize Rawls’s work for failing to prioritize economic liberty? Should the problems of distributive justice be understood in terms of luck egalitarian or relational egalitarian assumptions? When institutions aim at equality, what is it that they should seek to equalize—primary goods, capabilities, or welfare? Does Rawls’s theory of justice have the resources to address justice for people who are significantly dependent on others and their caregivers? Is Rawls’s theory adequate for addressing gender injustice? Can or should Rawls’s theory include justice for nonhuman animals? Should the principles of economic justice that hold at the global level be similar to the egalitarian principles of justice that hold at the domestic level? Is Rawls’s theory of global justice too tolerant of nonliberal societies? For each question, there is an introductory essay, providing an overview of the relevant arguments from Rawls’s work and the historical contours of the debate that ensued. Each introductory essay is followed by two essays written by scholars who take opposing positions, moving the discussion forward in a fruitful way.
Oxford University PressNew York
Title: John Rawls
Description:
Abstract
This collection of original essays explores major areas of debate inspired by the political philosophy of John Rawls.
The volume is divided into ten parts, exploring ten distinct questions: Can Rawls’s conception of public reason offer determinate answers to major questions of justice? Is ideal theory useful or relevant to resolving issues of justice in the nonideal world? Are libertarians correct to criticize Rawls’s work for failing to prioritize economic liberty? Should the problems of distributive justice be understood in terms of luck egalitarian or relational egalitarian assumptions? When institutions aim at equality, what is it that they should seek to equalize—primary goods, capabilities, or welfare? Does Rawls’s theory of justice have the resources to address justice for people who are significantly dependent on others and their caregivers? Is Rawls’s theory adequate for addressing gender injustice? Can or should Rawls’s theory include justice for nonhuman animals? Should the principles of economic justice that hold at the global level be similar to the egalitarian principles of justice that hold at the domestic level? Is Rawls’s theory of global justice too tolerant of nonliberal societies? For each question, there is an introductory essay, providing an overview of the relevant arguments from Rawls’s work and the historical contours of the debate that ensued.
Each introductory essay is followed by two essays written by scholars who take opposing positions, moving the discussion forward in a fruitful way.
Related Results
Rawls and East Asian Philosophies
Rawls and East Asian Philosophies
Abstract
Rawls barely mentions East Asian philosophies, but East Asian political philosophers, especially Confucians, have frequently regarded Rawls as “the Other” w...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
John Rawls' Theory of Justice in the Perspective of Shareholder Rights Protection
John Rawls' Theory of Justice in the Perspective of Shareholder Rights Protection
John Rawls' Theory of Justice offers a robust conceptual framework for developing fair legal policies, particularly in the context of post-merger and acquisition corporate integrat...
COSTRUIRE IL RAGIONEVOLE. IL LIBERALISMO POLITICO DI RAWLS TRA RORTY E HABERMAS
COSTRUIRE IL RAGIONEVOLE. IL LIBERALISMO POLITICO DI RAWLS TRA RORTY E HABERMAS
L’articolo investiga il concetto di “ragionevole”, che può essere definito la chiave di volta del liberalismo politico di John Rawls, esplicitandone le opposte interpretazioni poss...
POLITICAL LIBERALISM VS. RIGHT-WING LIBERTARIANISM: JOHN RAWLS IN
ENCOUNTER WITH ROBERT NOZICK
POLITICAL LIBERALISM VS. RIGHT-WING LIBERTARIANISM: JOHN RAWLS IN
ENCOUNTER WITH ROBERT NOZICK
Abstract. Among twentieth-century political philosophers, Americans
John Rawls and Robert Nozick are generally recognized as giants – both
for the boldness of their arguments and f...
John Rawls
John Rawls
This chapter examines the impact of John Rawls's A Theory of Justice on the liberal audience that took it up. In A Theory of Justice, Rawls offers a defense of civil disobedience t...
Right-Wing Populism and Noncoercive Injustice
Right-Wing Populism and Noncoercive Injustice
Abstract
John Rawls’s The Law of Peoples makes several assumptions that, in the years since that book’s writing, have been shown to be potentially flawed. The first ...
John Rawls
John Rawls
Abstract
John Rawls’s bookA Theory of Justice’has received an enormous amount of attention, probably more than any other twentieth-century work of political philosop...

