Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Anthropological Linguistics
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Anthropological linguistics is the subfield of linguistics (and anthropology) concerned with the place of language in its wider social and cultural context, its role in forging and sustaining cultural practices and social structures. While Duranti (2001) denies that a true field of anthropological linguistics exists, preferring the term linguistic anthropology to cover this subfield, I regard the two terms as interchangeable. With some cogency, Duranti (2001) argues that due to current concerns of mainstream linguistics with the explicit analysis of the formal structures of language in contrast to anthropology's broader approach of looking at how humans make meaning through semiotic systems in cultural practices, this subfield is properly included within anthropology rather than linguistics. However, I beg to differ, believing that the current historical divisions of academic turf are just that—historical and contingent—and subject to change, and I would be loath to institutionalize such divisions by insisting on rigidly labeled compartments. The current disciplinary concerns of linguistics do not reflect its earlier history in which it was firmly enjoined to anthropology (Boas, 1940; Sapir, 1949; Haas, 1977, 1978). It is my firm hope that, over time, this more inclusive view will reassert itself, and hence my preference is to use both terms to cover this subfield, although, as titled, I will stick with the label anthropological linguistics in this article.
Title: Anthropological Linguistics
Description:
Abstract
Anthropological linguistics is the subfield of linguistics (and anthropology) concerned with the place of language in its wider social and cultural context, its role in forging and sustaining cultural practices and social structures.
While Duranti (2001) denies that a true field of anthropological linguistics exists, preferring the term linguistic anthropology to cover this subfield, I regard the two terms as interchangeable.
With some cogency, Duranti (2001) argues that due to current concerns of mainstream linguistics with the explicit analysis of the formal structures of language in contrast to anthropology's broader approach of looking at how humans make meaning through semiotic systems in cultural practices, this subfield is properly included within anthropology rather than linguistics.
However, I beg to differ, believing that the current historical divisions of academic turf are just that—historical and contingent—and subject to change, and I would be loath to institutionalize such divisions by insisting on rigidly labeled compartments.
The current disciplinary concerns of linguistics do not reflect its earlier history in which it was firmly enjoined to anthropology (Boas, 1940; Sapir, 1949; Haas, 1977, 1978).
It is my firm hope that, over time, this more inclusive view will reassert itself, and hence my preference is to use both terms to cover this subfield, although, as titled, I will stick with the label anthropological linguistics in this article.
Related Results
Construct a Teaching System Combining Image Linguistics and Multimedia Technology
Construct a Teaching System Combining Image Linguistics and Multimedia Technology
At present, the research on the theoretical system of multimedia image linguistics in my country is very limited. In order to further improve and develop the theoretical system of ...
Pedagogical Linguistics in Romance
Pedagogical Linguistics in Romance
Linguists tend to underestimate their educational and societal role, but linguistics matters. Therefore, this article is a plea for linguists to act accordingly and to fulfill thei...
Business Anthropology and Education: Approaches, Methodologies, and Implications
Business Anthropology and Education: Approaches, Methodologies, and Implications
The contribution of anthropological contents and methods in different aspects of the study of education is significant. The business functions of education in terms of leadership a...
Anthropological turn in musical culture of the XX century
Anthropological turn in musical culture of the XX century
The anthropological turn in the system of cultural and musicological reflection determines the transformation of the image of man in the culture of the XX century. The ontological ...
Applied linguistics theory and application
Applied linguistics theory and application
Applied linguistics is an interdisciplinary field that identifies, investigates, and offers solutions to language-related real-life problems. Some of the academic fields related to...
Introduction
Introduction
This introduction seeks to outline a contemporary anthropological approach to crime and criminalization, an “anthropological criminology 2.0.” This anthropological criminology dist...
Linguistics is for everyone
Linguistics is for everyone
Abstract
Introducing students to linguistics before they embark on their undergraduate studies can increase awareness and
interest in the field....
Cognitive linguistics-inspired language instruction
Cognitive linguistics-inspired language instruction
Second language acquisition (SLA) or second/foreign language teaching has been influenced to various degrees by key linguistic theories, including structural linguistics (Bloomfiel...

