Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Cased Hole Production Testing with Extended Spacing Wireline Formation Testers
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Wireline formation testing in open hole can yield robust and reliable information about reservoir fluid type and productivity. However, operational or logistical concerns can sometimes preclude gathering a full open hole formation tester data set. In this case the operator is left to either forgo the information or acquire the data in cased hole. Perforating and production testing in cased hole can be time consuming and expensive especially when there are multiple layers to be tested. This can be mitigated by using wireline formation testers (WFT) in cased hole to test individual layers, but these testers have traditionally been limited in their possible interval length. In this paper we discuss cased hole wireline formation testing with a unique configuration of the WFT that allows testing intervals much greater than previously possible.
Wireline formation tester tools with straddle packers are typically limited to about 1-m spacing between the packers. With special adaptors spacings up to 3 m have been accomplished. However, when perforated intervals are longer than this the straddle packer is not an option: it is usually inadvisable to set the elements across perforated casing and cracks in the perforated cement can make the fluid typing ambiguous. This paper discusses a method whereby two separate straddle packer tools are combined and allow a significantly longer interval to be tested.
We present a case study where the extended interval was tested and flowed for several days with the formation tester and a confident determination of fluid type performed. Additionally, a long build-up time enabled us to derive a robust estimation of permeability. The operation was concluded in three days versus the ten days of rig time that would have been expected for a cased hole production test. We also show how this method can be extended to longer intervals in both open and cased hole. We conclude that this method is should be considered for zones that could not be tested in open hole but are not worthy of a full production test in cased hole.
Although cased whole WFT operations with straddle packers have been reported in the literature this is the first instance of a double WFT tool arrangement that allows testing layers of significant perforated length. Operational guidelines and environmental limitations are also discussed.
Title: Cased Hole Production Testing with Extended Spacing Wireline Formation Testers
Description:
Abstract
Wireline formation testing in open hole can yield robust and reliable information about reservoir fluid type and productivity.
However, operational or logistical concerns can sometimes preclude gathering a full open hole formation tester data set.
In this case the operator is left to either forgo the information or acquire the data in cased hole.
Perforating and production testing in cased hole can be time consuming and expensive especially when there are multiple layers to be tested.
This can be mitigated by using wireline formation testers (WFT) in cased hole to test individual layers, but these testers have traditionally been limited in their possible interval length.
In this paper we discuss cased hole wireline formation testing with a unique configuration of the WFT that allows testing intervals much greater than previously possible.
Wireline formation tester tools with straddle packers are typically limited to about 1-m spacing between the packers.
With special adaptors spacings up to 3 m have been accomplished.
However, when perforated intervals are longer than this the straddle packer is not an option: it is usually inadvisable to set the elements across perforated casing and cracks in the perforated cement can make the fluid typing ambiguous.
This paper discusses a method whereby two separate straddle packer tools are combined and allow a significantly longer interval to be tested.
We present a case study where the extended interval was tested and flowed for several days with the formation tester and a confident determination of fluid type performed.
Additionally, a long build-up time enabled us to derive a robust estimation of permeability.
The operation was concluded in three days versus the ten days of rig time that would have been expected for a cased hole production test.
We also show how this method can be extended to longer intervals in both open and cased hole.
We conclude that this method is should be considered for zones that could not be tested in open hole but are not worthy of a full production test in cased hole.
Although cased whole WFT operations with straddle packers have been reported in the literature this is the first instance of a double WFT tool arrangement that allows testing layers of significant perforated length.
Operational guidelines and environmental limitations are also discussed.
Related Results
Revival of Openhole DST: Compromising Between Wireline-Formation Testing and Cased-Hole DST
Revival of Openhole DST: Compromising Between Wireline-Formation Testing and Cased-Hole DST
Abstract
Exploration well testing has gone through several changes over the past twenty years. While open hole Drill Stem Testing (DST) based on conventional technol...
Wireline Perforating EFI System
Wireline Perforating EFI System
ABSTRACT
A new, safer, more flexible technology is now available for use by the oil & gas well wireline perforation industry. This new technology applies U. S...
Three-Dimensional Geomechanical Modeling and Well Spacing Optimization Application in Sichuan Shale Gas Block
Three-Dimensional Geomechanical Modeling and Well Spacing Optimization Application in Sichuan Shale Gas Block
ABSTRACT:
At present, unconventional reservoirs require horizontal drilling and large-scale hydraulic fracturing technology to increase artificial fracture networ...
Identifying a gas hydrate production zone using a cased-hole borehole acoustic-reflection survey, Aurora/JOGMEC/NRCan Mallik 2L-38 gas hydrate production research well
Identifying a gas hydrate production zone using a cased-hole borehole acoustic-reflection survey, Aurora/JOGMEC/NRCan Mallik 2L-38 gas hydrate production research well
In 2007, data were acquired from a borehole acoustic-reflection survey (BARS), using the latest Sonic Scanner tool, in a gas-hydrate-bearing formation in the Mallik field, Mackenzi...
Wireline "creep"
Wireline "creep"
Abstract
Stationary operations, such as formation testing, sidewall core sampling or perforating, conducted with wireline tools are usually intended to be made at de...
A comprehensive review of cased hole sand control optimization techniques: Theoretical and practical perspectives
A comprehensive review of cased hole sand control optimization techniques: Theoretical and practical perspectives
Cased hole sand control is a critical aspect of oil and gas well management, ensuring efficient production by mitigating sand production issues. This review presents a comprehensiv...
Production Optimization in the Antrim Shale
Production Optimization in the Antrim Shale
Abstract
The Antrim Shale of the Michigan Basin is one of the most active natural gas plays in the U.S., accounting for over 1200 well completions during 1992. Despi...
Incorporating Emissions Into Wireline Formation Evaluation Risk Assessments
Incorporating Emissions Into Wireline Formation Evaluation Risk Assessments
As the global industry undergoes a transformative shift towards sustainability and emission reduction, traditional risk assessment metrics no longer capture the full spectrum of po...

