Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Gas Reconciliation with Advance Error Reduction

View through CrossRef
Abstract Pipelines are the most economically viable mode of transportation for oil and gas. Every pipeline is monitored 24×7 using meters distributed across the pipeline. Flow, temperature and pressure meters are the most common and essential for continuous and efficient operation of pipelines. Like any other instrument these meters also have uncertainty and prone to error due to irregular calibration, drift, gross error and other such events. The overall accuracy of pipeline metering increases as the distance between consecutive meters decreases. It is also affected by the placement of meters at critical locations like pipeline tapouts, tapins and consumers points. Economics do not allow pipeline operators to install beyond a certain amount of metering assets. The complexity to efficiently calculate the product in and out of a gas pipeline is more compared to a liquid pipeline. It arises due to the high compressibility of gases compared to liquids. Gas pipelines operate at much higher pressure than oil pipelines. The trapped gas inside a gas pipeline can be called line pack of that pipeline. The line pack is very sensitive to two natural factors pressure and temperature of the pipeline. Oil pipelines carry one fluid at a time. Gas pipelines on the other hand carry several gases as a mixture. Unlike oil, gas billings are calculated as the energy the gas mixture carries to the consumer. Due to the mixture, gas composition is another essential factor to accurately calculate energy of the mixture. This paper discusses the challenges of calculating various transport factors and phenomena in gas pipelines and how methods like gross error correction and machine learning can be used to increase the accuracy. The results and conclusions are derived from the applications of these methods to natural gas transportation pipeline. Some of most important conclusions obtained were Understanding the pattern of on-field meter data with ideal meter provides insights in the root cause of the problem. e.g. sudden spike in temperature leading to error in line pack.Creating digital twin of all metering assets allows faster isolation of pipeline sections having calculation errors. e.g. by monitoring the difference between field and ideal parameters.Having a central meter diagnostics system that combines the data from meters of different make and models improve the pattern recognition and error detection ability.Gross error detection isolates the meters inducing error. The feedback can be provided to the machine learning algorithms for root cause analysis. Note: This paper only covers the gross error of meters. There are methods used to reduce other meter errors namely random, limiting and systematic not covered in this paper. Readers are requested to read relevant material to understand the complete scope of errors in metering systems.
Title: Gas Reconciliation with Advance Error Reduction
Description:
Abstract Pipelines are the most economically viable mode of transportation for oil and gas.
Every pipeline is monitored 24×7 using meters distributed across the pipeline.
Flow, temperature and pressure meters are the most common and essential for continuous and efficient operation of pipelines.
Like any other instrument these meters also have uncertainty and prone to error due to irregular calibration, drift, gross error and other such events.
The overall accuracy of pipeline metering increases as the distance between consecutive meters decreases.
It is also affected by the placement of meters at critical locations like pipeline tapouts, tapins and consumers points.
Economics do not allow pipeline operators to install beyond a certain amount of metering assets.
The complexity to efficiently calculate the product in and out of a gas pipeline is more compared to a liquid pipeline.
It arises due to the high compressibility of gases compared to liquids.
Gas pipelines operate at much higher pressure than oil pipelines.
The trapped gas inside a gas pipeline can be called line pack of that pipeline.
The line pack is very sensitive to two natural factors pressure and temperature of the pipeline.
Oil pipelines carry one fluid at a time.
Gas pipelines on the other hand carry several gases as a mixture.
Unlike oil, gas billings are calculated as the energy the gas mixture carries to the consumer.
Due to the mixture, gas composition is another essential factor to accurately calculate energy of the mixture.
This paper discusses the challenges of calculating various transport factors and phenomena in gas pipelines and how methods like gross error correction and machine learning can be used to increase the accuracy.
The results and conclusions are derived from the applications of these methods to natural gas transportation pipeline.
Some of most important conclusions obtained were Understanding the pattern of on-field meter data with ideal meter provides insights in the root cause of the problem.
e.
g.
sudden spike in temperature leading to error in line pack.
Creating digital twin of all metering assets allows faster isolation of pipeline sections having calculation errors.
e.
g.
by monitoring the difference between field and ideal parameters.
Having a central meter diagnostics system that combines the data from meters of different make and models improve the pattern recognition and error detection ability.
Gross error detection isolates the meters inducing error.
The feedback can be provided to the machine learning algorithms for root cause analysis.
Note: This paper only covers the gross error of meters.
There are methods used to reduce other meter errors namely random, limiting and systematic not covered in this paper.
Readers are requested to read relevant material to understand the complete scope of errors in metering systems.

Related Results

Improving hydrological forecasts through temporal hierarchal reconciliation
Improving hydrological forecasts through temporal hierarchal reconciliation
<p>Hydrological forecasts at different horizons are often made using different models. These forecasts are usually temporally inconsistent (e.g., monthly forecasts ma...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...
Critical Gas Saturation During Depressurisation and its Importance in the Brent Field
Critical Gas Saturation During Depressurisation and its Importance in the Brent Field
Critical Gas Saturation During Depressurisation and its Importance in the Brent Field. Abstract After some 20 years of pressure ...
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Unconventional Reservoirs: Basic Petrophysical Concepts for Shale Gas
Abstract Unconventional reservoirs have burst with considerable force in oil and gas production worldwide. Shale Gas is one of them, with intense activity taking pla...
A New IPR Curve Of Gas-Water Well In Gas Reservoirs Undergoing Simultaneous Water Production
A New IPR Curve Of Gas-Water Well In Gas Reservoirs Undergoing Simultaneous Water Production
Abstract Based on principle of mass conservation, this paper sets up a new mathematical model of gas-water two-phase underground percolation, and the model includ...
Liquid Loading of Horizontal Gas Wells in Changbei Gas Field
Liquid Loading of Horizontal Gas Wells in Changbei Gas Field
The Changbei gas field, which initially exhibited high gas-production performance, is dominated by large-displacement horizontal wells. With the decrease in reservoir pressure, the...
Understanding Unconventional Gas Reservoir Damages
Understanding Unconventional Gas Reservoir Damages
Abstract It is estimated that there are large reserves of unconventional gas located throughout the world, including coalbed methane, shale gas and tight gas sand...
Use of Bandra Formation Lean Gas as Fuel Gas at Heera Processing Complex (Offshore)
Use of Bandra Formation Lean Gas as Fuel Gas at Heera Processing Complex (Offshore)
Abstract HEERA, one of the most promising hydrocarbon producing fields in Mumbai offshore; produces oil and gas from multilayered pay zones ranging from depth of 700...

Back to Top