Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Intraoperative navigation in craniofacial surgery
View through CrossRef
Craniofacial surgery requires comprehensive anatomical knowledge of the head and neck to ensure patient safety and surgical precision. Over recent decades, there have been significant advancements in imaging techniques and the development of real-time surgical navigation systems. Intraoperative navigation technology aligns surgical instruments with imaging-derived information on patient anatomy, enabling surgeons to closely follow preoperative plans. This system functions as a radiologic map, improving the accuracy of instrument placement and minimizing surgical complications. The introduction of first-generation navigation systems in the early 1990s revolutionized surgical procedures by enabling real-time tracking of instruments using preoperative imaging. Initially utilized in neurosurgery, intraoperative navigation has since become standard practice in otolaryngology, cranio-maxillofacial surgery, and orthopedics. Since the 2000s, second-generation navigation systems have been developed to meet the growing demand for precision across various surgical specialties. The adoption of these systems in craniofacial surgery has been slower, but their use is increasing, particularly in procedures such as foreign body removal, facial bone fracture reconstruction, tumor resection, and craniofacial reconstruction and implantation. In Korea, insurance coverage for navigation in craniofacial surgery began in 2021, and new medical technologies for orbital wall fracture treatment were approved in August 2022. These technologies have only recently become clinically available, but are expected to play an increasingly important role in craniofacial surgery. Intraoperative navigation enhances operative insight, improves target localization, and increases surgical safety. Although these systems have a steep learning curve and initially prolong surgery, efficiency improves with experience. Calibration issues, registration errors, and soft tissue deformation can introduce inaccuracies. Nonetheless, navigation technology is evolving, and the integration of intraoperative computed tomography data holds promise for further enhancements of surgical accuracy. This paper discusses the various types and applications of navigation employed in craniofacial surgery, highlighting their benefits and limitations.
Title: Intraoperative navigation in craniofacial surgery
Description:
Craniofacial surgery requires comprehensive anatomical knowledge of the head and neck to ensure patient safety and surgical precision.
Over recent decades, there have been significant advancements in imaging techniques and the development of real-time surgical navigation systems.
Intraoperative navigation technology aligns surgical instruments with imaging-derived information on patient anatomy, enabling surgeons to closely follow preoperative plans.
This system functions as a radiologic map, improving the accuracy of instrument placement and minimizing surgical complications.
The introduction of first-generation navigation systems in the early 1990s revolutionized surgical procedures by enabling real-time tracking of instruments using preoperative imaging.
Initially utilized in neurosurgery, intraoperative navigation has since become standard practice in otolaryngology, cranio-maxillofacial surgery, and orthopedics.
Since the 2000s, second-generation navigation systems have been developed to meet the growing demand for precision across various surgical specialties.
The adoption of these systems in craniofacial surgery has been slower, but their use is increasing, particularly in procedures such as foreign body removal, facial bone fracture reconstruction, tumor resection, and craniofacial reconstruction and implantation.
In Korea, insurance coverage for navigation in craniofacial surgery began in 2021, and new medical technologies for orbital wall fracture treatment were approved in August 2022.
These technologies have only recently become clinically available, but are expected to play an increasingly important role in craniofacial surgery.
Intraoperative navigation enhances operative insight, improves target localization, and increases surgical safety.
Although these systems have a steep learning curve and initially prolong surgery, efficiency improves with experience.
Calibration issues, registration errors, and soft tissue deformation can introduce inaccuracies.
Nonetheless, navigation technology is evolving, and the integration of intraoperative computed tomography data holds promise for further enhancements of surgical accuracy.
This paper discusses the various types and applications of navigation employed in craniofacial surgery, highlighting their benefits and limitations.
Related Results
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
<p dir="ltr">Neurosurgery involves significant risks due to the intricate anatomy and delicate structures of the brain and spine. Developing techniques to improve surgical ac...
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
Intraoperative imaging, navigation and monitoring
<p dir="ltr">Neurosurgery involves significant risks due to the intricate anatomy and delicate structures of the brain and spine. Developing techniques to improve surgical ac...
Craniofacial Syndromes Part I: Craniofacial Growth and Development, Craniosynostosis Syndromes, Craniofacial Microsomia, and Craniofacial Dysostoses
Craniofacial Syndromes Part I: Craniofacial Growth and Development, Craniosynostosis Syndromes, Craniofacial Microsomia, and Craniofacial Dysostoses
Craniofacial syndromes are a diverse group of congenital disorders primarily affecting structures of the head and face. Recent genetic advances have improved our ability to diagno...
Efficacy and Safety of Glycopyrronium Bromide 1% Cream in Axillary and Extra‐Axillary Primary Hyperhidrosis: A Real‐Life Two‐Center Experience on 68 Subjects
Efficacy and Safety of Glycopyrronium Bromide 1% Cream in Axillary and Extra‐Axillary Primary Hyperhidrosis: A Real‐Life Two‐Center Experience on 68 Subjects
Introduction:
Primary hyperhidrosis (PH) is a common disorder affecting approximately 1% of the general population, characterized by focal sweating in excess of...
One-Year Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
One-Year Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Abstract
Residency trainings in oral and maxillofacial surgery, plastic surgery, or otolaryngology do not sufficiently cover all aspects of craniofacial surgery to enab...
High-Precision Navigation Approach of High-Orbit Spacecraft Based on Retransmission Communication Satellites
High-Precision Navigation Approach of High-Orbit Spacecraft Based on Retransmission Communication Satellites
Many countries have presented new requirements for in-orbit space services. Space autonomous rendezvous and docking technology could speed up the development of in-orbit spacecraft...
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Risk factor analysis of enterocutaneous fistula after small bowel surgery
Abstract:
Background: ECF most frequently follows a complication of abdominal surgery, although a smaller number occur spontaneously in association with conditia
Background: Entero...
Craniofacial cartilage organoids from human embryonic stem cells via a neural crest cell intermediate
Craniofacial cartilage organoids from human embryonic stem cells via a neural crest cell intermediate
AbstractSevere birth defects or major injuries to the face require surgical reconstruction and rehabilitation. The ability to make bona fide craniofacial cartilage – cartilage of t...

