Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Dynamic Behaviour of Geopolymer Concrete with Varied Compositions and Equivalent Compressive Strengths
View through CrossRef
Previous studies have suggested that incorporating crumb rubber into concrete enhances impact resistance and energy absorption. However, these studies often overlook the associated reduction in compressive strength when crumb rubber replaces fine aggregates, leading to comparisons between concretes with different strengths. This study addresses this gap by investigating the dynamic behaviour of two geopolymer concrete mixes, G1-25R and G2-0R, both designed to achieve similar compressive strengths despite their differing compositions. Mix G1-25R includes 25% crumb rubber replacement of fine aggregates and a binder composed of 90% fly ash and 10% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), while Mix G2-0R has no crumb rubber and uses only fly ash as the binder. Dynamic performance was assessed using a drop tower setup across six testing configurations. Results indicate that both mixes exhibit comparable peak impact forces and energy absorption capacities, which is attributed primarily to their similar compressive strengths. Although G1-25R’s crumb rubber content enhances ductility in static compressive tests, this increased ductility does not significantly influence dynamic resistance when compared similar strength geopolymer concrete with no crumb rubber. These findings suggest that crumb rubber can be effectively recycled in geopolymer concrete, providing comparable impact resistance and energy absorption to traditional concrete.
Title: Dynamic Behaviour of Geopolymer Concrete with Varied Compositions and Equivalent Compressive Strengths
Description:
Previous studies have suggested that incorporating crumb rubber into concrete enhances impact resistance and energy absorption.
However, these studies often overlook the associated reduction in compressive strength when crumb rubber replaces fine aggregates, leading to comparisons between concretes with different strengths.
This study addresses this gap by investigating the dynamic behaviour of two geopolymer concrete mixes, G1-25R and G2-0R, both designed to achieve similar compressive strengths despite their differing compositions.
Mix G1-25R includes 25% crumb rubber replacement of fine aggregates and a binder composed of 90% fly ash and 10% Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBFS), while Mix G2-0R has no crumb rubber and uses only fly ash as the binder.
Dynamic performance was assessed using a drop tower setup across six testing configurations.
Results indicate that both mixes exhibit comparable peak impact forces and energy absorption capacities, which is attributed primarily to their similar compressive strengths.
Although G1-25R’s crumb rubber content enhances ductility in static compressive tests, this increased ductility does not significantly influence dynamic resistance when compared similar strength geopolymer concrete with no crumb rubber.
These findings suggest that crumb rubber can be effectively recycled in geopolymer concrete, providing comparable impact resistance and energy absorption to traditional concrete.
Related Results
Systematic multiscale models to predict the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at various mixture proportions and curing regimes
Systematic multiscale models to predict the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at various mixture proportions and curing regimes
Geopolymer concrete is an inorganic concrete that uses industrial or agro by-product ashes as the main binder instead of ordinary Portland cement; this leads to the geopolymer conc...
AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH ON THE INFLUENCE OF ADDITIION OF METAKAOLIN ON THE PROPERTIES OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE
AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH ON THE INFLUENCE OF ADDITIION OF METAKAOLIN ON THE PROPERTIES OF GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE
Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is an innovative alternative to conventional Portland cement concrete, utilizing industrial by-products such as fly ash, slag, and metakaolin as primary b...
Durability Studies on Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete Incorporated with Slag and Alkali Solutions
Durability Studies on Fly Ash Based Geopolymer Concrete Incorporated with Slag and Alkali Solutions
This study explores the durability of green cementitious material of geopolymer concrete. Geopolymer concrete is produced from the polycondensation reaction of aluminosilicate mate...
BRIEF REVIEW OF GEOPOLYMER BINDER
BRIEF REVIEW OF GEOPOLYMER BINDER
Concrete is a famous component in construction due to the ease of work in shape and dimension. However, concrete is highly dependent on the availability of Ordinary Portland cement...
Evaluation of non-destructive testing and long-term durability of geopolymer aggregate concrete
Evaluation of non-destructive testing and long-term durability of geopolymer aggregate concrete
Recent advancements in concrete technology focus more on increasing strength than durability. Concrete with good durability will withstand adverse conditions like frost, chloride p...
Assessment of Geopolymer Concrete for Underwater Concreting Properties
Assessment of Geopolymer Concrete for Underwater Concreting Properties
For ages, concrete has been used to construct underwater structures. Concrete laying underwater is a very complex procedure important to the success or failure of underwater projec...
Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Recycled Aggregate Concrete, Geopolymer Concrete, and Recycled Aggregate-Based Geopolymer Concrete
Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Recycled Aggregate Concrete, Geopolymer Concrete, and Recycled Aggregate-Based Geopolymer Concrete
This study presents a life cycle impact assessment of OPC concrete, recycled aggregate concrete, geopolymer concrete, and recycled aggregate-based geopolymer concrete by using the ...
Solidification of Synthetic-Based Drilling Mud Using Geopolymers
Solidification of Synthetic-Based Drilling Mud Using Geopolymers
Abstract
When constructing deepwater wells, incompatibility between synthetic-based mud (SBM) and Portland cements can lead to poor cementation and loss of cement in...

