Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

WTP2.03 Predictors for appendicectomy operative severity and outcomes

View through CrossRef
Abstract Aim This retrospective analysis aimed at evaluating appendicectomy outcomes in view of in-hospital delay and identifying predictive factors for complicated appendicitis. Methods Data collection of consecutive appendicectomies over eight months period was executed. Primary outcome was the impact of in-hospital (decision to incision) delay on severity of operative findings, operative time, length of hospital stays (LOS) and morbidity. Secondary outcomes included possible predictors for complicated operative findings. Patients were categorised into 3 groups: <8 hours, 8-24 hours, and >24 hours. Widespread peritoneal pus, gangrene and perforation of appendix were considered as complicated findings. Results 198 patients were included, with 74% diagnosed by CT, 5% by USS/MRI and 21% by clinical examination. Appendicectomy was delayed for <8 hours in 38% of patients, 8-12 hours in 52%, and >24 hours in 9%. There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in operative findings, escalated CT to operative findings, operative time or early complications. Similarly, no notable difference was found in 30-day readmissions or complications rates. Despite the evident increased LOS with longer delay (2, 2.57, 2.61 in respective groups), this impact was statistically non-significant (P=0.077). The presence of fever and raised CRP above 100 were significantly correlated to complicated operative findings (P<0.0001). Isolated hyperbilirubinemia (P=0.004) and imaging confirmed complicated findings (P<0.0001) were also strong predictors. Conclusion Appendicectomy can be delayed safely to facilitate effective theatre prioritisation, bearing in mind clinical context and WSES 2020 recommended safe 24-hour delay. Patients with positive predictor criteria should be prioritised for surgery.
Title: WTP2.03 Predictors for appendicectomy operative severity and outcomes
Description:
Abstract Aim This retrospective analysis aimed at evaluating appendicectomy outcomes in view of in-hospital delay and identifying predictive factors for complicated appendicitis.
Methods Data collection of consecutive appendicectomies over eight months period was executed.
Primary outcome was the impact of in-hospital (decision to incision) delay on severity of operative findings, operative time, length of hospital stays (LOS) and morbidity.
Secondary outcomes included possible predictors for complicated operative findings.
Patients were categorised into 3 groups: <8 hours, 8-24 hours, and >24 hours.
Widespread peritoneal pus, gangrene and perforation of appendix were considered as complicated findings.
Results 198 patients were included, with 74% diagnosed by CT, 5% by USS/MRI and 21% by clinical examination.
Appendicectomy was delayed for <8 hours in 38% of patients, 8-12 hours in 52%, and >24 hours in 9%.
There was no statistically significant difference between the 3 groups in operative findings, escalated CT to operative findings, operative time or early complications.
Similarly, no notable difference was found in 30-day readmissions or complications rates.
Despite the evident increased LOS with longer delay (2, 2.
57, 2.
61 in respective groups), this impact was statistically non-significant (P=0.
077).
The presence of fever and raised CRP above 100 were significantly correlated to complicated operative findings (P<0.
0001).
Isolated hyperbilirubinemia (P=0.
004) and imaging confirmed complicated findings (P<0.
0001) were also strong predictors.
Conclusion Appendicectomy can be delayed safely to facilitate effective theatre prioritisation, bearing in mind clinical context and WSES 2020 recommended safe 24-hour delay.
Patients with positive predictor criteria should be prioritised for surgery.

Related Results

5 Predictors for Appendicectomy Operative Severity and Outcomes
5 Predictors for Appendicectomy Operative Severity and Outcomes
Abstract Background WSES 2020 guidelines recommend surgery within 8 hours for complicated appendicitis and allow up to 24...
Appendicectomy mortality: an Australian national audit
Appendicectomy mortality: an Australian national audit
AbstractBackgroundAppendicectomy is a safe surgical procedure with minimal risks. Low mortality rates (0.04–0.24%) have been reported from a number of countries. Appendicectomy mor...
PERITONEAL CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE IN OPEN APPENDICECTOMIES
PERITONEAL CLOSURE VERSUS NON-CLOSURE IN OPEN APPENDICECTOMIES
Acute Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency and Open Appendicectomy is widely performed. This study aims to analyze the difference of outcome in peritoneal closure versus Non...
Operative versus Non-Operative Management of The Medial Malleolus in Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Fractures – A Systematic Review
Operative versus Non-Operative Management of The Medial Malleolus in Bimalleolar and Trimalleolar Fractures – A Systematic Review
Purpose Ankle fractures are the fifth most common fracture worldwide. Some reviews have shown that non-operative management of isolated medial malleolar fractures has satisfactory ...
Paper 59: No Difference in Post-Operative Outcomes for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Surgery Performed Acutely vs Chronically
Paper 59: No Difference in Post-Operative Outcomes for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Surgery Performed Acutely vs Chronically
Objectives: There have been no large studies that directly compare long term outcomes in patients with Rockwood grade III-V acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations treated with ac...
Preoperative Resilience Strongest Predictor of Postoperative Outcome Following an Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
Preoperative Resilience Strongest Predictor of Postoperative Outcome Following an Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
Objectives: Resilience, which is a psychometric property related to “hardiness” or the ability to respond to challenging situations, is a recognized predictor in many outcomes’ dom...
The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score
The Elbow UCL Injury Prognosis Score
Objectives: No model exists to predict which patients with elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries will successfully return to play (RTP) with non-operative treatment. The r...

Back to Top