Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Repliek

View through CrossRef
ResponseIt is good for the further development of historical research into the police force that the reviews not only extol the virtues of the study in question, but also ask pertinent questions about the basic principles behind the research, the way in which the subject was methodically examined, and how the findings were edited. The question in the critique written by Van Doorslaer concerning the magistrature’s role in how the Dutch police operated during the German Occupation, is a matter that certainly deserves more attention than it received in this study. However, anyone wishing to give an informed answer to this question would not only have to scrutinize the relationship between the magistrates and the police, but would also have to closely examine the relationship between the government and the police as well. This is because in the Netherlands the government traditionally has a lot to say with regard to the police. The question, therefore, is how did both of these institutions function towards the police during the German Occupation. The core question in the comments made by Jansen is whether enough attention was given to the position of the police in the constitutional state. He is of the opinion that the problematic matter of police authority was inadequately dealt with. Indeed, this issue was largely bypassed, although this was not the case with regard to the position of the police in the constitutional state. Its relationship with government and the legal system, in other words, how the police force is embedded within the state system, is traditionally seen as one of the key questions in this context. Spierenburg argues in his critique that the politicalorganisational developments are dealt with in too biased a fashion in this study and so the professional developments in the police machinery and the changes in the monopoly on the use of force are skirted over. This statement cuts no ice for a variety of reasons. The main one is that the changes in the monopoly on the use of force and in the police profession take shape, first and foremost, in the organisational development of the police. This link between them is continuously and rigourously examined in this study. This review is part of the discussion forum 'De geschiedenis van de Nederlandse politie' (Cyrille Fijnaut).
BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review, KNHG
Title: Repliek
Description:
ResponseIt is good for the further development of historical research into the police force that the reviews not only extol the virtues of the study in question, but also ask pertinent questions about the basic principles behind the research, the way in which the subject was methodically examined, and how the findings were edited.
The question in the critique written by Van Doorslaer concerning the magistrature’s role in how the Dutch police operated during the German Occupation, is a matter that certainly deserves more attention than it received in this study.
However, anyone wishing to give an informed answer to this question would not only have to scrutinize the relationship between the magistrates and the police, but would also have to closely examine the relationship between the government and the police as well.
This is because in the Netherlands the government traditionally has a lot to say with regard to the police.
The question, therefore, is how did both of these institutions function towards the police during the German Occupation.
 The core question in the comments made by Jansen is whether enough attention was given to the position of the police in the constitutional state.
He is of the opinion that the problematic matter of police authority was inadequately dealt with.
Indeed, this issue was largely bypassed, although this was not the case with regard to the position of the police in the constitutional state.
Its relationship with government and the legal system, in other words, how the police force is embedded within the state system, is traditionally seen as one of the key questions in this context.
Spierenburg argues in his critique that the politicalorganisational developments are dealt with in too biased a fashion in this study and so the professional developments in the police machinery and the changes in the monopoly on the use of force are skirted over.
This statement cuts no ice for a variety of reasons.
The main one is that the changes in the monopoly on the use of force and in the police profession take shape, first and foremost, in the organisational development of the police.
This link between them is continuously and rigourously examined in this study.
 This review is part of the discussion forum 'De geschiedenis van de Nederlandse politie' (Cyrille Fijnaut).

Related Results

Repliek
Repliek
Hoewel in de laatste jaren sterk de nadruk is gelegd op de “autonomie” van het geschrevene ten opzichte van de schrijver en diens belevingswereld, wil deze auteur graag beginnen m...
Inzicht door onderdompeling. Een reactie op Bart Van de Putte, Henk de Smaele en Dirk Jan Wolffram
Inzicht door onderdompeling. Een reactie op Bart Van de Putte, Henk de Smaele en Dirk Jan Wolffram
Giving a detailed account of the social history of The Hague’s most prominent sites of civilised leisure – the gentlemen’s clubs, the zoo, the Royal Theatre and the seaside resort ...
Repliek op Dirk Jacobs
Repliek op Dirk Jacobs
De bespreking van Jacobs van de bundel 'Rapporteren over kwalitatief onderzoek' is teleurstellend te noemen. Op het hoofdthema van de bundel (rapporteren van kwalitatief onderzoek)...
Repliek van het Rijksmuseum
Repliek van het Rijksmuseum
Response from the RijksmuseumIn its new format the Rijksmuseum is showing an integrated display of artistic and historical objects. As a result of its collection history, the museu...
Repliek
Repliek
Hilde Ham heeft een mooie, doordachte en op punten complimenteuze recensie geschreven over mijn proefschrift. Ik ben haar daarvoor veel dank verschuldigd. Al was het maar, omdat er...
Ministeriabel
Ministeriabel
Ministeriabel – tot slot Reactie op de repliek van dr. R.S.J. Martha LLM....
Dupliek Bas Levering
Dupliek Bas Levering
De reactie van Ciano Aydin op mijn bespreking van zijn interessante bundel is niet de krampachtige verdediging die je in reacties op recensies al te vaak tegenkomt. Ze vormt een we...

Back to Top