Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The Position of Clitics in Udi
View through CrossRef
Abstract
It has been claimed that endoclitics do not exist (e.g. Klavans 1985). On the other hand, it has been suggested that Pashto is a language in which clitics occur inside the verb. Kaisse (1981, 1985: 132 – 43) showed that in Pashto, the clitics at issue always follow a morpheme; they do not occur inside a morpheme. Roberts (1997) has argued recently that the morpheme at issue is, in fact, part of the verb; thus on his analysis the clitics are endoclitic, of the intermorphemic variety. In this chapter it is shown that in Udi, too, intermorphemic clitics occur. It is shown in addition that in Udi clitics occur inside monomorphemic verb roots. As discussed in Chapter 1, the position of the PM in Udi has never been fully described. The most complete statement is that of Schulze (1982: 168 – 9), cited in §1.4.1, and repeated as Table 6.1 below. (Recall that PZ = my PM, V = verb, T = TAM marker, Vn = the nominal incorporated into the verb, and HV = light verb.) Examples I have elicited and collected in texts require us to recognize additional patterns; 6’ is only a variant of Schulze’s pattern 6.
Title: The Position of Clitics in Udi
Description:
Abstract
It has been claimed that endoclitics do not exist (e.
g.
Klavans 1985).
On the other hand, it has been suggested that Pashto is a language in which clitics occur inside the verb.
Kaisse (1981, 1985: 132 – 43) showed that in Pashto, the clitics at issue always follow a morpheme; they do not occur inside a morpheme.
Roberts (1997) has argued recently that the morpheme at issue is, in fact, part of the verb; thus on his analysis the clitics are endoclitic, of the intermorphemic variety.
In this chapter it is shown that in Udi, too, intermorphemic clitics occur.
It is shown in addition that in Udi clitics occur inside monomorphemic verb roots.
As discussed in Chapter 1, the position of the PM in Udi has never been fully described.
The most complete statement is that of Schulze (1982: 168 – 9), cited in §1.
4.
1, and repeated as Table 6.
1 below.
(Recall that PZ = my PM, V = verb, T = TAM marker, Vn = the nominal incorporated into the verb, and HV = light verb.
) Examples I have elicited and collected in texts require us to recognize additional patterns; 6’ is only a variant of Schulze’s pattern 6.
Related Results
Auxiliary clitics in Polish
Auxiliary clitics in Polish
Polish auxiliary clitics constitute an interesting set of data which draws attention to cross-linguistic differences among Slavic languages. A general principle for clitic placemen...
Focus Clefts and the Origins of Focus in Udi
Focus Clefts and the Origins of Focus in Udi
Abstract
The focus-marking property of PMs in Udi, while not unique among languages of the world, is quite remarkable. An investigation of its origin and that of ...
East Slavic
East Slavic
Abstract
In this final descriptive chapter we discuss the status of clitics in East Slavic (ESl). These include Russian (Rus), to which most of the chapter is devote...
The Nominal Domain
The Nominal Domain
Abstract
In this chapter we review the data about clitics associated with and situated inside the nominal domain. These are clitics dependent in some way on nouns. P...
Slavic Clitics as Heads
Slavic Clitics as Heads
Abstract
This chapter is the analytical core of the book. It argues for an approach to Slavic clitics according to which they are always introduced as functional hea...
Development of the Udi Verb out of its Proto-Lezgian Sources
Development of the Udi Verb out of its Proto-Lezgian Sources
Abstract
This chapter investigates how the structure of the Udi verb developed out of its Proto-Lezgian and Proto-North East Caucasian sources. In particular, I c...
When clitics collide
When clitics collide
Summary
The paper deals with a few aspects of the morphosyntax of clitics in Piedmontese (Western Romance) and their historical
development. In Piedmontese an element =l= (orth...

