538 Peer MRCS Teaching Among Surgical Trainees in the East Midlands Deanery, UK

Abstract Background During the covid-19 pandemic, the East Midlands South Deanery ran virtual peer-MRCS OSCE teaching. We analysed two surveys to understand the impact of peer-MRCS teaching on surgical trainees in this region. Method One survey was completed by peer-MRCS teachers who delivered sessions in 2020–2021. The second survey was completed by prospective MRCS OSCE candidates. Responses were anonymised. Results 7 / 8 peer teachers and 13/17 prospective learners completed the surveys. 6/7 peer-teachers had previous experience and prior teacher-training ranged from day courses to university degrees. All peer-teachers felt that peer-MRCS teaching enabled them to refresh their anatomy knowledge. 0/7 peer-teachers preferred to deliver practical-skills teaching. Passion for teaching was identified as a motivating factor by all peer teachers. This was further supported by the general consensus (5/7) for peer teachers preferring feedback that is focused on self-development rather than conveying appreciation. Majority (12/13) of peer learners also preferred to give feedback focused on teacher development and felt they were more likely (7/13) to provide accurate feedback for peer-sessions when compared to formal teaching sessions run by the deanery. Majority of participating prospective MRCS OSCE candidates (12/13) expressed an interest in peer-MRCS teaching. Low stress environment and cost effectiveness were the top reasons why prospective peer learners preferred virtual peer MRCS teaching. Conclusions Overall peer-MRCS teaching in this cohort suggests advantages to both peer-teachers and learners with the potential to improve teaching skills and clinical knowledge among surgical trainees.