Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer

View through CrossRef
<span> <p><span>It is common to loosely speak of “Congress” as making federal law—or what the Constitution refers to as the “supreme Law of the Land.”&nbsp; But what, precisely, do we mean when we speak of “Congress” as lawmaker?&nbsp; One might be tempted to answer that those references to “Congress” refer to the House and Senate alone.&nbsp; And in many other contexts, that simple definition is (of course) legally accurate.&nbsp; But when we think more carefully about references to “Congress” making law, it becomes clear that the simple definition will not do.&nbsp; That is because the Constitution does not permit the House and Senate to make law alone—those two chambers must instead make law in concert with a third actor: the President.&nbsp; The situation is thus reminiscent of that in England, where the constitutional theorist A.V. Dicey explained that “Parliament means, in the mouth of a lawyer . . . the King, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons.”&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span>This Article argues that, like in England where the supreme law of the land is made by a legally precise understanding of “Parliament” that includes the King, in America the supreme law of the land is made by a legally precise understanding of “Congress” that includes the President.&nbsp; Of course, in formal terms, the President is not actually a member of Congress (although the Vice President is).&nbsp; But informal references to “Congress” as lawmaker are not themselves intended to be legally precise.&nbsp; Instead, those references are best understood as implicit references to a broader, multi-branch “Congress” that includes the President.&nbsp; This Article elucidates those implicit references to the multi-branch “Congress” and explains why failing to make those implicit references explicit has led to substantial problems in the field of statutory interpretation.&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span><b>Suggested Citation</b>: Chad Squitieri, <i>Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer</i>, 78 Ala. L. Rev. (forthcoming)</span></p></span>
Title: Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer
Description:
<span> <p><span>It is common to loosely speak of “Congress” as making federal law—or what the Constitution refers to as the “supreme Law of the Land.
”&nbsp; But what, precisely, do we mean when we speak of “Congress” as lawmaker?&nbsp; One might be tempted to answer that those references to “Congress” refer to the House and Senate alone.
&nbsp; And in many other contexts, that simple definition is (of course) legally accurate.
&nbsp; But when we think more carefully about references to “Congress” making law, it becomes clear that the simple definition will not do.
&nbsp; That is because the Constitution does not permit the House and Senate to make law alone—those two chambers must instead make law in concert with a third actor: the President.
&nbsp; The situation is thus reminiscent of that in England, where the constitutional theorist A.
V.
Dicey explained that “Parliament means, in the mouth of a lawyer .
.
.
the King, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons.
”&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span>This Article argues that, like in England where the supreme law of the land is made by a legally precise understanding of “Parliament” that includes the King, in America the supreme law of the land is made by a legally precise understanding of “Congress” that includes the President.
&nbsp; Of course, in formal terms, the President is not actually a member of Congress (although the Vice President is).
&nbsp; But informal references to “Congress” as lawmaker are not themselves intended to be legally precise.
&nbsp; Instead, those references are best understood as implicit references to a broader, multi-branch “Congress” that includes the President.
&nbsp; This Article elucidates those implicit references to the multi-branch “Congress” and explains why failing to make those implicit references explicit has led to substantial problems in the field of statutory interpretation.
&nbsp;</span></p> <p><span><b>Suggested Citation</b>: Chad Squitieri, <i>Congress in the Mouth of a Lawyer</i>, 78 Ala.
L.
Rev.
(forthcoming)</span></p></span>.

Related Results

Lawyer confidentiality
Lawyer confidentiality
The role of the lawyer is characterized by a focus on counseling, advocacy and conciliation. A lawyer advises a client on legal issues, considers the possibilities of resolving the...
Mapping regional oral dryness
Mapping regional oral dryness
The Regional Oral Dryness Inventory (RODI), a newly developed questionnaire which quantifies the severity of dryness at various locations in the mouth. It was found that there is a...
Word Of Mouth as Media
Word Of Mouth as Media
Abstract. The development in the culinary field is inseparable from the various changes in globalization factors through the internet which are the triggers, including the increasi...
The role of dry mouth in screening sleep apnea
The role of dry mouth in screening sleep apnea
ABSTRACTPurpose of the studyEffective screening questionnaires are essential for early detection of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The STOP-Bang questionnaire has high sensitivity ...
Doce River mouth dynamics and morphological changes over recent years
Doce River mouth dynamics and morphological changes over recent years
&lt;p&gt;Deltaic river mouths are dynamic coastal environments and often exhibit significant morphological changes over different timescales. One of these environments is l...
Sero-prevalence of foot and mouth disease in cattle in Borena Zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia
Sero-prevalence of foot and mouth disease in cattle in Borena Zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia
ObjectiveTo determine the sero-prevalnce of FMD and indicate patterns of animal movement in Borena zone, Ethiopia.IntroductionThe Foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus is a highly con...
Pengaruh Electronic Word of Mouth Website Female Daily terhadap Keputusan Followers Membeli Produk Kosmetik
Pengaruh Electronic Word of Mouth Website Female Daily terhadap Keputusan Followers Membeli Produk Kosmetik
Abstract. Phenomenon of online shopping has resulted in changes in consumer behavior where consumers rely on reviews in making purchasing decisions. This study aims to determine th...

Back to Top