Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The humoral immune response to the BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatrics on renal replacement therapy
View through CrossRef
AbstractIntroductionSince the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, data published on the immunogenicity of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatric patients receiving renal replacement therapy are scant. Our primary objective is to study this population's humoral immune response to the COVID‐19 vaccine.MethodsPediatric kidney transplant recipients (PKTRs) and hemodialysis recipients (HR) at our center who received two doses of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162B2 vaccine were included. Transplant and HR who had PCR‐positive COVID‐19 infections during the study, regardless of their vaccine status, were also included. SARS‐CoV‐2 anti‐spike protein (S1/S2) IgG was measured after the second dose of the vaccine and after any PCR‐positive COVID‐19 infection as routine clinical practice. Data on demographics, induction, maintenance immunosuppressants, type of transplant, and posttransplant or dialysis duration were included.ResultsOf the 61 patients included, 19 were dialysis recipients who received two doses of vaccine without subsequent infection (HV), and 42 were kidney transplant recipients. All dialysis patients and 33 (78.6%) transplant recipients received two doses of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162b2 vaccine. A total of 33.3% (11/33) of the transplant recipients who received vaccination developed COVID‐19 infection (KTH) at a median time of 13 days after the second dose of vaccine. Nine transplant patients had pure COVID‐19 infection without vaccination (KTI). The seroconversion rate in the HV group was 94.7% (18/19) compared to 50% (11/22) in the kidney transplant vaccine recipients who did not develop subsequent COVID‐19 infection (KTV) (p < .001). The median S1/S2 IgG titers for the HV group were 400 AU/mL versus 15 AU/mL in the KTV group (p < .0001). There was no significant difference in the duration of the test from the second dose of the vaccine between HV and KTV (55 vs. 33.5 days, p = .095). The KTH had higher titers than KTV group (370 vs. 15 p < .0001). The median duration of the test after vaccination in the vaccine group and those with hybrid immunity was similar (35 vs. 33.5 days, p = .2).There were no clear predictors for seroconversion in the PKTRs. Natural infection alone was as good as the vaccine in eliciting humoral immune response.ConclusionThe humoral immune response to two doses of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in PKTRs without subsequent COVID‐19 infection is suboptimal compared to that in hemodialysis recipients and in PKTRs with hybrid immunity from both infection and vaccination.
Title: The humoral immune response to the BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatrics on renal replacement therapy
Description:
AbstractIntroductionSince the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, data published on the immunogenicity of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in pediatric patients receiving renal replacement therapy are scant.
Our primary objective is to study this population's humoral immune response to the COVID‐19 vaccine.
MethodsPediatric kidney transplant recipients (PKTRs) and hemodialysis recipients (HR) at our center who received two doses of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162B2 vaccine were included.
Transplant and HR who had PCR‐positive COVID‐19 infections during the study, regardless of their vaccine status, were also included.
SARS‐CoV‐2 anti‐spike protein (S1/S2) IgG was measured after the second dose of the vaccine and after any PCR‐positive COVID‐19 infection as routine clinical practice.
Data on demographics, induction, maintenance immunosuppressants, type of transplant, and posttransplant or dialysis duration were included.
ResultsOf the 61 patients included, 19 were dialysis recipients who received two doses of vaccine without subsequent infection (HV), and 42 were kidney transplant recipients.
All dialysis patients and 33 (78.
6%) transplant recipients received two doses of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162b2 vaccine.
A total of 33.
3% (11/33) of the transplant recipients who received vaccination developed COVID‐19 infection (KTH) at a median time of 13 days after the second dose of vaccine.
Nine transplant patients had pure COVID‐19 infection without vaccination (KTI).
The seroconversion rate in the HV group was 94.
7% (18/19) compared to 50% (11/22) in the kidney transplant vaccine recipients who did not develop subsequent COVID‐19 infection (KTV) (p < .
001).
The median S1/S2 IgG titers for the HV group were 400 AU/mL versus 15 AU/mL in the KTV group (p < .
0001).
There was no significant difference in the duration of the test from the second dose of the vaccine between HV and KTV (55 vs.
33.
5 days, p = .
095).
The KTH had higher titers than KTV group (370 vs.
15 p < .
0001).
The median duration of the test after vaccination in the vaccine group and those with hybrid immunity was similar (35 vs.
33.
5 days, p = .
2).
There were no clear predictors for seroconversion in the PKTRs.
Natural infection alone was as good as the vaccine in eliciting humoral immune response.
ConclusionThe humoral immune response to two doses of the SARS‐CoV‐2 BNT 162B2 vaccine in PKTRs without subsequent COVID‐19 infection is suboptimal compared to that in hemodialysis recipients and in PKTRs with hybrid immunity from both infection and vaccination.
Related Results
Risk Factors for Low Humoral Response to BNT-162b2 In Hemodialysis Patients
Risk Factors for Low Humoral Response to BNT-162b2 In Hemodialysis Patients
Abstract
Introduction
Maintenance Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at higher risk of both infection and mortality associated with...
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
EPD Electronic Pathogen Detection v1
Electronic pathogen detection (EPD) is a non - invasive, rapid, affordable, point- of- care test, for Covid 19 resulting from infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus. EPD scanning techno...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Abstract 469: Progress towards developing a universal, prophylactic cancer vaccine.
Abstract 469: Progress towards developing a universal, prophylactic cancer vaccine.
Abstract
Background: Our goal is to create a vaccine that would be administered to prevent cancer. Such a vaccine would overcome many of the problems and limitations...
Measles Vaccination Coverage and Protective Effectiveness in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2019-2024
Measles Vaccination Coverage and Protective Effectiveness in the Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia, 2019-2024
Abstract
Background:
Despite the availability of an effective vaccine, measles remains a major public health problem in Ethiopi...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Vaccine candidates, immuno-dominant antigens, and potent vaccine adjuvants for preventing cutaneous leishmaniasis: a sys
Vaccine candidates, immuno-dominant antigens, and potent vaccine adjuvants for preventing cutaneous leishmaniasis: a sys
Background: Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is the most common
clinical form of leishmaniasis that causes skin disease. Currently,
there is no licensed prophylactic vaccine for CL, as...
Humoral Response to BNT162b2 mRNA Covid19 Vaccine in Peritoneal and Hemodialysis Patients: a Comparative Study
Humoral Response to BNT162b2 mRNA Covid19 Vaccine in Peritoneal and Hemodialysis Patients: a Comparative Study
Abstract
Introduction
Generalized immunization against COVID19 has become the cornerstone in prevention of severe acute respira...

