Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Buddhist Art and Architecture in Mongolia
View through CrossRef
Mongolian Buddhist art and architecture were largely unknown in Western academic literature before the opening of Mongolia and Russia in 1990 and of China in the 1980s, followed by the organization of exhibitions of their arts abroad. This article maps out major resources on Mongolian Buddhist art and architecture, here understood as the art and architecture of the Mongolian populations who live not only in Mongolia (known as “Outer Mongolia” before 1911, also referred to as Northern, or Khalkha Mongolia) itself but also in China (mostly in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, or southern Mongolia) and in Russia (Republics of Buryatia and Kalmykia). The study of Mongolian Buddhist art and architecture is still at an incipient stage and reflects the compartmentalization between the Mongols of China and those of Mongolia and Russia, though exchanges between researchers are developing. Comparatively few artifacts have survived the migrations, nomadizations, and, above all, the destructions after the fall of the Mongol Empire in the late 14th century and the religious persecution and destruction of material culture of the 20th-century Communist regimes of Russia, Mongolia (1936–1938), and China (during the Cultural Revolution, 1966–1976). Old photographs and textual descriptions of buildings and artifacts are therefore important to complement our knowledge of this field. Mongolian culture has been qualified as “osmotic,” receiving, borrowing, absorbing, and acculturating foreign influences with great receptivity. But Mongols did not borrow randomly: they were eclectic in their choices, according to their own cultural norms and aspirations. This is obvious when dealing with art and architecture, where borrowings are sometimes so well integrated that they were forgotten, and nationalists now claim Mongols are themselves at the origin of some forms and motifs. Since the 1990s, interest in Mongolian material heritage has led to the development of projects of cooperation between Mongolia and foreign partners in the fields of archaeology, art history, survey and restoration of monasteries, and establishment of new museums. The volume of publications, especially of catalogues of private and public collections of Mongolian art, has recently increased, but large collections, such as those kept in Russia, have yet to be published, and many Buddhist statues and paintings still labeled as “Sino-Tibetan” in Western museums should probably be attributed to Mongolia.
Title: Buddhist Art and Architecture in Mongolia
Description:
Mongolian Buddhist art and architecture were largely unknown in Western academic literature before the opening of Mongolia and Russia in 1990 and of China in the 1980s, followed by the organization of exhibitions of their arts abroad.
This article maps out major resources on Mongolian Buddhist art and architecture, here understood as the art and architecture of the Mongolian populations who live not only in Mongolia (known as “Outer Mongolia” before 1911, also referred to as Northern, or Khalkha Mongolia) itself but also in China (mostly in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, or southern Mongolia) and in Russia (Republics of Buryatia and Kalmykia).
The study of Mongolian Buddhist art and architecture is still at an incipient stage and reflects the compartmentalization between the Mongols of China and those of Mongolia and Russia, though exchanges between researchers are developing.
Comparatively few artifacts have survived the migrations, nomadizations, and, above all, the destructions after the fall of the Mongol Empire in the late 14th century and the religious persecution and destruction of material culture of the 20th-century Communist regimes of Russia, Mongolia (1936–1938), and China (during the Cultural Revolution, 1966–1976).
Old photographs and textual descriptions of buildings and artifacts are therefore important to complement our knowledge of this field.
Mongolian culture has been qualified as “osmotic,” receiving, borrowing, absorbing, and acculturating foreign influences with great receptivity.
But Mongols did not borrow randomly: they were eclectic in their choices, according to their own cultural norms and aspirations.
This is obvious when dealing with art and architecture, where borrowings are sometimes so well integrated that they were forgotten, and nationalists now claim Mongols are themselves at the origin of some forms and motifs.
Since the 1990s, interest in Mongolian material heritage has led to the development of projects of cooperation between Mongolia and foreign partners in the fields of archaeology, art history, survey and restoration of monasteries, and establishment of new museums.
The volume of publications, especially of catalogues of private and public collections of Mongolian art, has recently increased, but large collections, such as those kept in Russia, have yet to be published, and many Buddhist statues and paintings still labeled as “Sino-Tibetan” in Western museums should probably be attributed to Mongolia.
Related Results
Inner Mongolia, Outer Mongolia
Inner Mongolia, Outer Mongolia
The Mongolian Empire, which reigned over the Eurasia Continent, was a great empire in the Middle Ages. Now, however, it is a divided nation, with a current population of about 10 m...
Buddhist Art and Architecture in India
Buddhist Art and Architecture in India
As Leoshko demonstrates in her Sacred Traces: British Explorations of Buddhism in South Asia (2003), the early development of historical study of Buddhist art and architecture in I...
The architecture of differences
The architecture of differences
Following in the footsteps of the protagonists of the Italian architectural debate is a mark of culture and proactivity. The synthesis deriving from the artistic-humanistic factors...
Buddhist Talismans
Buddhist Talismans
Talismans are ubiquitous across time and space in Buddhist Asia. With its long history and a wide range of variations, several other terms such as “amulets,” “charms,” and “seals” ...
The distribution and significance of Buddhist remains in Central Asia
The distribution and significance of Buddhist remains in Central Asia
Buddhist remains in Central Asia are found in five regions: Bactria-Toharistan region in southern Uzbekistan and in southwestern Tajikistan, Fergana region in eastern Uzbekistan an...
Japanese Buddhist Sculpture
Japanese Buddhist Sculpture
The official history of Japanese Buddhist sculpture purportedly begins when emissaries from the Korean kingdom of Baekje presented Emperor Kinmei with a gilt bronze statue of Śākya...
A comparison of Mongolian basic words between Mongolia and China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region: Focusing on the classical Mongolian language study publishedin China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region
A comparison of Mongolian basic words between Mongolia and China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region: Focusing on the classical Mongolian language study publishedin China’s Inner Mongolia autonomous region
In this paper, the basic vocabulary of both regions was compared and analyzed based on the classical Mongolian language study books of Mongolia and China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomou...
East Asian Modern and Contemporary Lay Buddhist Movement: Focused on Prof. Rhi Ki-Young’s Thought
East Asian Modern and Contemporary Lay Buddhist Movement: Focused on Prof. Rhi Ki-Young’s Thought
Rhi Ki-Young's Buddhist thought is to gain an insight into the world through the fundamental spirit of Mahāyāna Buddhism and constantly reproduce it in reality. He sees the startin...

