Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

In-Vitro Fertilization Protocols: Agonist versus Antagonist in Relation to Ovarian Response, Embryological Performance, and Treatment Characteristics

View through CrossRef
Objective: To compare the characteristics of ovarian stimulation, oocyte maturation, embryo development, and transfer-related parameters between the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in infertile couples having intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Study Design: Retrospective comparison analysisPlace and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Collage of Pharmacy, University of Duhok from 20th August 2024 to 28th February 2025. Methods: This retrospective comparison analysis was performed on 200 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles utilising either a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist regimen. We looked at the length of stimulation, the amount of gonadotropin used, the reaction of the ovaries, the age of the oocytes, the success of fertilisation, the quality of the embryos, the thickness of the endometrium, and the day of embryo transfer. Results: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol correlated with markedly reduced stimulation days (p=0.003) and diminished gonadotropin requirements (p<0.001). The ovarian response was more effective in antagonist cycles, with increased quantities of metaphase II oocytes (p=0.001) and fertilised oocytes (p=0.010). Thequality of embryos varied considerably among procedures (p < 0.001), with antagonist cycles yielding a greater percentage of high-grade blastocysts and more frequent day-5 embryo transfers (p<0.001). The endometrialthickness on the day of embryo transfer was considerably higher in antagonist cycles (p=0.032). Conclusion: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist programs exhibit enhanced stimulation efficacy and embryological outcomes relative to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocols. These data indicate that biological and treatment-related benefits linked to antagonist regimens may enhance reproductive outcomes.
Title: In-Vitro Fertilization Protocols: Agonist versus Antagonist in Relation to Ovarian Response, Embryological Performance, and Treatment Characteristics
Description:
Objective: To compare the characteristics of ovarian stimulation, oocyte maturation, embryo development, and transfer-related parameters between the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in infertile couples having intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Study Design: Retrospective comparison analysisPlace and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, Collage of Pharmacy, University of Duhok from 20th August 2024 to 28th February 2025.
Methods: This retrospective comparison analysis was performed on 200 Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles utilising either a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist regimen.
We looked at the length of stimulation, the amount of gonadotropin used, the reaction of the ovaries, the age of the oocytes, the success of fertilisation, the quality of the embryos, the thickness of the endometrium, and the day of embryo transfer.
Results: The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol correlated with markedly reduced stimulation days (p=0.
003) and diminished gonadotropin requirements (p<0.
001).
The ovarian response was more effective in antagonist cycles, with increased quantities of metaphase II oocytes (p=0.
001) and fertilised oocytes (p=0.
010).
Thequality of embryos varied considerably among procedures (p < 0.
001), with antagonist cycles yielding a greater percentage of high-grade blastocysts and more frequent day-5 embryo transfers (p<0.
001).
The endometrialthickness on the day of embryo transfer was considerably higher in antagonist cycles (p=0.
032).
Conclusion: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist programs exhibit enhanced stimulation efficacy and embryological outcomes relative to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocols.
These data indicate that biological and treatment-related benefits linked to antagonist regimens may enhance reproductive outcomes.

Related Results

P-668 The LH endocrine profile in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone analogue cycles
P-668 The LH endocrine profile in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone analogue cycles
Abstract Study question What does the evolution of luteinizing hormone (LH) throughout the follicular phase look like in differe...
Ovarian seromucinous carcinoma: an independent epithelial ovarian cancer?
Ovarian seromucinous carcinoma: an independent epithelial ovarian cancer?
Abstract Background 2020 World Health Organization Classification of Female Genital Tumors removed ovarian seromucinous carcinoma as a distinct enti...
Effects of different fertilization practices on the N03-N, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, ash and dietary fibre contents of carrot
Effects of different fertilization practices on the N03-N, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, ash and dietary fibre contents of carrot
The effects of different fertilization practices on the NO3-N, N, P, K, Ca, Mg, ash and dietary fibre contents of carrots were studied in field experiments in southern Finland. Uni...
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract IA31: Molecular epidemiology of ovarian cancer
Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) accounts for 5% of all cancer deaths and is the fifth leading cause of cancer death in women in the United States. While the...
Abstract MIP-048: SHORT-FORM RON KINASE AS A NOVEL THERAPEUTIC TARGET IN OVARIAN CANCER
Abstract MIP-048: SHORT-FORM RON KINASE AS A NOVEL THERAPEUTIC TARGET IN OVARIAN CANCER
Abstract BACKGROUND: Although 70–80% of women respond to standard platinum-based chemotherapy, a majority of patients will develop recurrent platinum-resistant disea...

Back to Top