Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Let Down Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty
View through CrossRef
Background:
Preservation rhinoplasty is a re-emerging technique that lacks data on functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Objective:
To measure the change in patient-reported nasal aesthetic perception, nasal breathing, and sleep and compare outcomes between two different septal cartilage manipulation techniques among patients undergoing preservation rhinoplasty.
Methods:
Functional and aesthetic outcomes of a let down dorsal preservation rhinoplasty using either the modified subdorsal strip method (MSSM) or subdorsal Z-flap are assessed pre- and postoperatively using the validated assessment tools Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).
Results:
Fifty-two patients, 40 women and 12 men ages 15–69 years, underwent dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and the majority reported at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively significant improvement based on a paired
t
-test in NOSE, SNOT-22, SCHNOS, and ESS scores except for ESS scores at 6 and 12 months. No significant difference based on a two-sample
t
-test was observed between the MSSM and Z-flap techniques implemented.
Conclusion:
Let down dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with either the MSSM or Z-flap cartilage manipulation technique can achieve significant improvement in nasal aesthetics, nasal breathing, and sleep according to patient responses on validated assessment tools.
Title: Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Let Down Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty
Description:
Background:
Preservation rhinoplasty is a re-emerging technique that lacks data on functional and aesthetic outcomes.
Objective:
To measure the change in patient-reported nasal aesthetic perception, nasal breathing, and sleep and compare outcomes between two different septal cartilage manipulation techniques among patients undergoing preservation rhinoplasty.
Methods:
Functional and aesthetic outcomes of a let down dorsal preservation rhinoplasty using either the modified subdorsal strip method (MSSM) or subdorsal Z-flap are assessed pre- and postoperatively using the validated assessment tools Nose Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS).
Results:
Fifty-two patients, 40 women and 12 men ages 15–69 years, underwent dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and the majority reported at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively significant improvement based on a paired
t
-test in NOSE, SNOT-22, SCHNOS, and ESS scores except for ESS scores at 6 and 12 months.
No significant difference based on a two-sample
t
-test was observed between the MSSM and Z-flap techniques implemented.
Conclusion:
Let down dorsal preservation rhinoplasty with either the MSSM or Z-flap cartilage manipulation technique can achieve significant improvement in nasal aesthetics, nasal breathing, and sleep according to patient responses on validated assessment tools.
Related Results
Rhinoplasty for beginners – article review
Rhinoplasty for beginners – article review
Rhinoplasty is a surgical procedure that mainly has a cosmetic role but also implies a functional one for the improvement of nasal obstruction. The wide variation in the patient’s ...
Morphological study of dorsal Barton's fracture based on three-dimensional CT imaging
Morphological study of dorsal Barton's fracture based on three-dimensional CT imaging
Abstract
Background
Dorsal Barton's fracture is a distinct type of distal radius fracture. The treatment of dorsal Barton's fracture is contentious and may lead to severe ...
Entrapment Neuropathy Causing Persistent Headache Symptoms after Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty
Entrapment Neuropathy Causing Persistent Headache Symptoms after Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty
Background:
The frequency of nonsurgical rhinoplasty has increased in recent years. The occurrence of headaches or migraine symptoms, and their treatment following nons...
RHINOPLASTY SCOPING REVIEW
RHINOPLASTY SCOPING REVIEW
Introduction: in 2022, rhinoplasty was the third most common facial surgical procedure in the US, with 45,000 interventions. Since its inception in 1887, it has evolved to address ...
Rhinoplasty and Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy in Cleft Patients
Rhinoplasty and Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy in Cleft Patients
Introduction:
Cleft patients often need orthognathic surgery to correct maxillary hypoplasia and rhinoplasty to correct nasal deformity. Rhinoplasty can be performed as...
Case report: Two cases of Cleft rhinoplasty
Case report: Two cases of Cleft rhinoplasty
The correction of cleft lip nose deformity remains a great challenge for any cleft surgeon. The nose is a prominent part of the face, and any cleft lip repair directs the beholders...
MODULATION OF NASAL SKIN THICKNESS WITH ISOTRETINOIN: ENHANCEMENT OF RESULTS IN RHINOPLASTY
MODULATION OF NASAL SKIN THICKNESS WITH ISOTRETINOIN: ENHANCEMENT OF RESULTS IN RHINOPLASTY
Introduction: The thickness and sebaceous nature of nasal skin are critical determinants in the planning and outcome of rhinoplasty procedures. Thicker skin is commonly associated ...
The Evolution of Septorhinoplasty Advances in Techniques and Technologies
The Evolution of Septorhinoplasty Advances in Techniques and Technologies
Objective: Explore how modern surgical procedures and innovative technology affect the results of septorhinoplasty. The research establishes a comparison between classic surgical a...

