Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Act 1 of Berg’s Lulu

View through CrossRef
Abstract This chapter has to do with Berg’s interpretation of Erdgeist in Act 1 of his opera and connects it to the new, expanded understanding of censorship. Building on work by Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, Robert C. Post wrote in 1998 that censorship “establishes the practices that define us as social subjects.” Post thereby offered a frame of reference for genres that have social practices as their subject matter, two of which critics have linked to Erdgeist: when Wedekind turned the first three acts of the Ur-Lulu into the basis of Erdgeist, he made the self-censorship that allows us to function in a society thematic in his new play. Berg chose to refine Wedekind’s material, but also to emphasize passages that reveal the origins of Erdgeist in a play Wedekind had conceived as a “monster tragedy”; in doing this, Berg clearly intended to prepare the second half of the opera.
Oxford University PressNew York
Title: Act 1 of Berg’s Lulu
Description:
Abstract This chapter has to do with Berg’s interpretation of Erdgeist in Act 1 of his opera and connects it to the new, expanded understanding of censorship.
Building on work by Michel Foucault and Judith Butler, Robert C.
Post wrote in 1998 that censorship “establishes the practices that define us as social subjects.
” Post thereby offered a frame of reference for genres that have social practices as their subject matter, two of which critics have linked to Erdgeist: when Wedekind turned the first three acts of the Ur-Lulu into the basis of Erdgeist, he made the self-censorship that allows us to function in a society thematic in his new play.
Berg chose to refine Wedekind’s material, but also to emphasize passages that reveal the origins of Erdgeist in a play Wedekind had conceived as a “monster tragedy”; in doing this, Berg clearly intended to prepare the second half of the opera.

Related Results

Helene Berg and the Management of Berg’s Legacy, 1936–76
Helene Berg and the Management of Berg’s Legacy, 1936–76
Following Berg’s death the most pressing problem was the completion of the opera Lulu. Universal Edition contracted with Arnold Schoenberg to complete the work but Schoenberg subse...
Lulu
Lulu
Berg had several early ideas for a text for his second opera, and his choice finally fell on Frank Wedekind’s plays Earth Spirit and Pandora’s Box. Berg adapted the plays into a si...
Lulu and/or Geschwitz Idealized, in the symphonic pieces from “Lulu” and Elsewhere
Lulu and/or Geschwitz Idealized, in the symphonic pieces from “Lulu” and Elsewhere
Abstract This chapter treats an immediate context for censorship, here of Berg’s libretto for Lulu by authorities in Nazi Germany, and direct consequences of that ac...
“Burlesque Tragedy” and “tristan Rapture”
“Burlesque Tragedy” and “tristan Rapture”
Abstract This chapter addresses connections between the Lulu works of Wedekind and Berg and several understandings of “fin-de-siècle decadence.” The title quotes rev...
Berg’s Literal-Mindedness and Second Order Consequences of Censoring Wedekind
Berg’s Literal-Mindedness and Second Order Consequences of Censoring Wedekind
Abstract This chapter introduces Berg’s approach to handling discrepancies created by Wedekind’s responses to the threat of further censorship in the plays he derive...
Two Viennese Families
Two Viennese Families
In the book’s first chapter major events in Berg’s early life (1885–1911) in Vienna are traced: his family, his artistic impulses and influences, his self-instruction in music and ...

Back to Top