Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Emergency powers and the pandemic: Reflecting on state legislative reforms and the future of public health response
View through CrossRef
The first 2 years of combatting the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an unprecedented use of emergency powers. States responded with an equally unprecedented flurry of legislative changes to the legal underpinnings of emergency response and public health authorities. In this article, we provide a brief background on the framework and use of governors and state health officials’ emergency powers. We then analyze several key themes, including both the enhancement and restriction of powers, emerging from emergency management and public health legislation introduced in state and territorial legislatures. During the 2020 and 2021 state and territorial legislative sessions, we tracked legislation related to the emergency powers of governors and state health officials. Legislators introduced hundreds of bills impacting these powers, some enhancing and others restricting emergency powers. Enhancements included increasing vaccine access and expanding the pool of eligible medical professions that could administer vaccinations, strengthening public health investigation and enforcement authority for state agencies, and preclusion of local orders by orders at the state level. Restrictions included establishing oversight mechanisms for executive actions, limits on the duration of the emergency, limiting the scope of emergency powers allowed during a declared emergency, and other restraints. By describing these legislative trends, we hope to inform governors, state health officials, policymakers, and emergency managers about how changes in the law may impact future public health and emergency response capabilities. Understanding this new legal landscape is critical to effectively preparing for future threats.
Title: Emergency powers and the pandemic: Reflecting on state legislative reforms and the future of public health response
Description:
The first 2 years of combatting the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated an unprecedented use of emergency powers.
States responded with an equally unprecedented flurry of legislative changes to the legal underpinnings of emergency response and public health authorities.
In this article, we provide a brief background on the framework and use of governors and state health officials’ emergency powers.
We then analyze several key themes, including both the enhancement and restriction of powers, emerging from emergency management and public health legislation introduced in state and territorial legislatures.
During the 2020 and 2021 state and territorial legislative sessions, we tracked legislation related to the emergency powers of governors and state health officials.
Legislators introduced hundreds of bills impacting these powers, some enhancing and others restricting emergency powers.
Enhancements included increasing vaccine access and expanding the pool of eligible medical professions that could administer vaccinations, strengthening public health investigation and enforcement authority for state agencies, and preclusion of local orders by orders at the state level.
Restrictions included establishing oversight mechanisms for executive actions, limits on the duration of the emergency, limiting the scope of emergency powers allowed during a declared emergency, and other restraints.
By describing these legislative trends, we hope to inform governors, state health officials, policymakers, and emergency managers about how changes in the law may impact future public health and emergency response capabilities.
Understanding this new legal landscape is critical to effectively preparing for future threats.
.
Related Results
Banking Sector Reforms and Financial Intermediation in Nigeria
Banking Sector Reforms and Financial Intermediation in Nigeria
This study examined the effect of banking sector reforms on financial intermediation of commercial banks in Nigeria. Panel data were sourced from Central Bank of Nigeria Statistica...
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Envisioning Originalism Applied to Bioethics Cases
Photo ID 123697425 © Alexandersikov | Dreamstime.com
Abstract
Originalism is an increasingly prevalent method for interpreting provisions of the US Constitution. It requires strict...
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
2.L. Round table: Monitoring health reforms to inform policy innovation: the Health Systems and Policies Monitor
2.L. Round table: Monitoring health reforms to inform policy innovation: the Health Systems and Policies Monitor
Abstract
Background
The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies’ (Observatory) Health Systems and Policy Monitor (HS...
SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE RUSSIAN SYSTEM OF FISCAL FEDERALISM
SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE RUSSIAN SYSTEM OF FISCAL FEDERALISM
The aim of the research is to identify the main trends in separation of powers of the Russian Federation and subjects of the Russian Federation in the context of the new federal la...
State Compensation Liability for Legislative Action
State Compensation Liability for Legislative Action
The purpose of the state’s existence is to secure the safety of the community, to confirm the dignity of the people, and to guarantee basic rights. In the case of illegal action of...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...

