Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

The current status and future of andrology: A consensus report from the Cairo workshop group

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundIn attempting to formulate potential WHO guidelines for the diagnosis of male infertility, the Evidence Synthesis Group noted a paucity of high‐quality data on which to base key recommendations. As a result, a number of authors suggested that key areas of research/evidence gaps should be identified, so that appropriate funding and policy actions could be undertaken to help address key questions.ObjectivesThe overall objective of this Consensus workshop was to clarify current knowledge and deficits in clinical laboratory andrology, so that clear paths for future development could be navigated.Materials and MethodsFollowing a detailed literature review, each author, prior to the face‐to‐face meeting, prepared a summary of their topic and submitted a PowerPoint presentation. The topics covered were (a) Diagnostic testing in male fertility and infertility, (b) Male fertility/infertility in the modern world, (c) Clinical management of male infertility, and (d) The overuse of ICSI. At the meeting in Cairo on February 18, 2019, the evidence was presented and discussed and a series of consensus points agreed.ResultsThe paper presents a background and summary of the evidence relating to these four topics and addresses key points of significance. Following discussion of the evidence, a total of 36 consensus points were agreed.DiscussionThe Discussion section presents areas where there was further debate and key areas that were highlighted during the day.ConclusionThe consensus points provide clear statements of evidence gaps and/or potential future research areas/topics. Appropriate funding streams addressing these can be prioritized and consequently, in the short and medium term, answers provided. By using this strategic approach, andrology can make the rapid progress necessary to address key scientific, clinical, and societal challenges that face our discipline now and in the near future.
Title: The current status and future of andrology: A consensus report from the Cairo workshop group
Description:
AbstractBackgroundIn attempting to formulate potential WHO guidelines for the diagnosis of male infertility, the Evidence Synthesis Group noted a paucity of high‐quality data on which to base key recommendations.
As a result, a number of authors suggested that key areas of research/evidence gaps should be identified, so that appropriate funding and policy actions could be undertaken to help address key questions.
ObjectivesThe overall objective of this Consensus workshop was to clarify current knowledge and deficits in clinical laboratory andrology, so that clear paths for future development could be navigated.
Materials and MethodsFollowing a detailed literature review, each author, prior to the face‐to‐face meeting, prepared a summary of their topic and submitted a PowerPoint presentation.
The topics covered were (a) Diagnostic testing in male fertility and infertility, (b) Male fertility/infertility in the modern world, (c) Clinical management of male infertility, and (d) The overuse of ICSI.
At the meeting in Cairo on February 18, 2019, the evidence was presented and discussed and a series of consensus points agreed.
ResultsThe paper presents a background and summary of the evidence relating to these four topics and addresses key points of significance.
Following discussion of the evidence, a total of 36 consensus points were agreed.
DiscussionThe Discussion section presents areas where there was further debate and key areas that were highlighted during the day.
ConclusionThe consensus points provide clear statements of evidence gaps and/or potential future research areas/topics.
Appropriate funding streams addressing these can be prioritized and consequently, in the short and medium term, answers provided.
By using this strategic approach, andrology can make the rapid progress necessary to address key scientific, clinical, and societal challenges that face our discipline now and in the near future.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Cairo
Cairo
Much like the vibrant city on the Nile itself, scholarship on Cairo has seen many changes in recent years. The continued growth of the Egyptian capital, the transformation of its c...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Pembrolizumab and Sarcoma: A meta-analysis
Abstract Introduction: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody that promotes antitumor immunity. This study presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Hydatid Cyst of The Orbit: A Systematic Review with Meta-Data
Abstarct Introduction Orbital hydatid cysts (HCs) constitute less than 1% of all cases of hydatidosis, yet their occurrence is often linked to severe visual complications. This stu...
American Society of Andrology Its Beginnings
American Society of Andrology Its Beginnings
The term “andrology” was introduced in 1951 by Harald Siebke, a Professor of Gynecology in Bonn, Germany. However, many years passed before the term gained acceptance. It was not u...

Back to Top