Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Medical student well‐being during rural clinical placement: A cross‐sectional national survey

View through CrossRef
AbstractContextUnderstanding rural student well‐being is essential to inform the development and training of the future rural medical workforce so as to ensure a pipeline of rural doctors to meet rural communities' needs. However, little is known about the well‐being of students who are on rural placement. This study aims to identify the predictors of well‐being amongst a national sample of medical students on rural clinical placement.MethodsThe Federation of Rural Australian Medical Educators (FRAME) 2015 national exit survey of medical students, completed at the end of rural terms, was used (n = 644) to test the associations between well‐being and demographic, financial, academic, supervisor, placement and clinical skills factors, and attitude to future rural work. Univariate and logistic regression were used.ResultsStudents aged 18‐24 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.07 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.07‐31.46]) and 25‐34 years (OR, 4.06 [95% CI, 1.35‐12.18]) reported higher levels of well‐being compared to students aged over 35 years. Academic support from the rural clinical school (OR, 5.74 [95% CI, 2.59‐12.73]), perceived respect from supervisors (OR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.23‐7.99]), not feeling socially isolated (OR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.40‐5.20]), access to counselling services (OR, 2.05 [95% CI, 1.10‐3.83]), rural placement being a first choice (OR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.58‐5.86]) and positive attitudes to being part of a rural workforce in the future (OR, 4.0 [95% CI, 2.0‐8.3]) were associated with higher odds of well‐being compared to students who felt the opposite. Gender, rural background, financial support, clinical skills and role clarity were not found to be associated with well‐being (P > .5).ConclusionsThis study may provide guidance to rural clinical schools, policymakers and medical educators in developing rural placement programmes that enhance student well‐being so we can address workforce shortages in rural areas.
Title: Medical student well‐being during rural clinical placement: A cross‐sectional national survey
Description:
AbstractContextUnderstanding rural student well‐being is essential to inform the development and training of the future rural medical workforce so as to ensure a pipeline of rural doctors to meet rural communities' needs.
However, little is known about the well‐being of students who are on rural placement.
This study aims to identify the predictors of well‐being amongst a national sample of medical students on rural clinical placement.
MethodsThe Federation of Rural Australian Medical Educators (FRAME) 2015 national exit survey of medical students, completed at the end of rural terms, was used (n = 644) to test the associations between well‐being and demographic, financial, academic, supervisor, placement and clinical skills factors, and attitude to future rural work.
Univariate and logistic regression were used.
ResultsStudents aged 18‐24 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.
07 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.
07‐31.
46]) and 25‐34 years (OR, 4.
06 [95% CI, 1.
35‐12.
18]) reported higher levels of well‐being compared to students aged over 35 years.
Academic support from the rural clinical school (OR, 5.
74 [95% CI, 2.
59‐12.
73]), perceived respect from supervisors (OR, 3.
13 [95% CI, 1.
23‐7.
99]), not feeling socially isolated (OR, 2.
7 [95% CI, 1.
40‐5.
20]), access to counselling services (OR, 2.
05 [95% CI, 1.
10‐3.
83]), rural placement being a first choice (OR, 3.
04 [95% CI, 1.
58‐5.
86]) and positive attitudes to being part of a rural workforce in the future (OR, 4.
0 [95% CI, 2.
0‐8.
3]) were associated with higher odds of well‐being compared to students who felt the opposite.
Gender, rural background, financial support, clinical skills and role clarity were not found to be associated with well‐being (P > .
5).
ConclusionsThis study may provide guidance to rural clinical schools, policymakers and medical educators in developing rural placement programmes that enhance student well‐being so we can address workforce shortages in rural areas.

Related Results

AI-infused patients for enhanced clinical simulation
AI-infused patients for enhanced clinical simulation
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence in computers, allowing them to perform tasks that usually require human cognitive abilities, such as dec...
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Perceptions of Telemedicine and Rural Healthcare Access in a Developing Country: A Case Study of Bayelsa State, Nigeria
Abstract Introduction Telemedicine is the remote delivery of healthcare services using information and communication technologies and has gained global recognition as a solution to...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
The John Flynn Placement Program: Evidence for repeated rural exposure for medical students
The John Flynn Placement Program: Evidence for repeated rural exposure for medical students
AbstractObjective:  This paper reports on an evaluation of the John Flynn Placement Program (JFPP) for medical students. JFPP aims for medical students to experience both rural me...
Factors Affecting Rural Livelihood in Pakistan
Factors Affecting Rural Livelihood in Pakistan
The recent study “Affecting factors of rural livelihood with reference of services providers and rural female in district Mansehra” was conducted with objectives to determine the h...

Back to Top