Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THE GOBUSTAN NEOLITHIC CULTURE
View through CrossRef
Based on the study of concrete material, the paper proposes to introduce a new Neolithic archaeological culture in the Caucasus – the Gobustan culture. As the basis for a detailed typological analysis, the author examined numerous collections of stone tools, uncovered from the cultural layers of the Anazaga site. Although known since 1965, these materials have not been the subject of any monographic publication until now. The proposed study considers these collections in the context of synchronous sites of the region and in more broad terms – in the cultural area, which includes Neolithic industries of the studied type. The main typological basis for the identification of the Gobustan Neolithic culture is the type of tools, which is defined by the author as the Uytash point. In functional terms, this item is a peculiar flint arrowhead. The geography of this cultural-defining type includes the area of the Caspian Sea coasts, at least from Gobustan to the place of narrowing of the Caspian lowland on the Dagestan coast in the vicinity of modern Makhachkala. In view of the ambiguity and incompleteness of publications of data on radiocarbon analysis, the chronological framework of the Gobustan culture at the moment has to be discussed using only the concepts of relative age. Based on the possibilities of comparative-typological dating, we suggest to consider the time of its functioning in the period of the 6th and probably the beginning of the 5th millennia BC, approximately synchronously with two other Neolithic cultures of the Eastern Caucasus – Shomutepe and Chokh. At the same time, the Gobustan culture radically differes from the last two not only in terms of material culture, but also in the life-support strategy, characteristic to its bearers.
Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography
Title: THE GOBUSTAN NEOLITHIC CULTURE
Description:
Based on the study of concrete material, the paper proposes to introduce a new Neolithic archaeological culture in the Caucasus – the Gobustan culture.
As the basis for a detailed typological analysis, the author examined numerous collections of stone tools, uncovered from the cultural layers of the Anazaga site.
Although known since 1965, these materials have not been the subject of any monographic publication until now.
The proposed study considers these collections in the context of synchronous sites of the region and in more broad terms – in the cultural area, which includes Neolithic industries of the studied type.
The main typological basis for the identification of the Gobustan Neolithic culture is the type of tools, which is defined by the author as the Uytash point.
In functional terms, this item is a peculiar flint arrowhead.
The geography of this cultural-defining type includes the area of the Caspian Sea coasts, at least from Gobustan to the place of narrowing of the Caspian lowland on the Dagestan coast in the vicinity of modern Makhachkala.
In view of the ambiguity and incompleteness of publications of data on radiocarbon analysis, the chronological framework of the Gobustan culture at the moment has to be discussed using only the concepts of relative age.
Based on the possibilities of comparative-typological dating, we suggest to consider the time of its functioning in the period of the 6th and probably the beginning of the 5th millennia BC, approximately synchronously with two other Neolithic cultures of the Eastern Caucasus – Shomutepe and Chokh.
At the same time, the Gobustan culture radically differes from the last two not only in terms of material culture, but also in the life-support strategy, characteristic to its bearers.
Related Results
Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric
Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric
In the last issue of Starinar (LXII/2012) a contribution On Neolithic Authenticity of Finds from Belica was published. The authors Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric (further A-P)...
The Future Neolithic
The Future Neolithic
As for Shakespeare, every generation gets the Neolithic it deserves. This chapter discusses emerging views of what the Neolithic is and how to study it, with the thesis that recent...
Neolithic Scotland: ScARF Panel Report
Neolithic Scotland: ScARF Panel Report
The main recommendations of the Panel report can be summarised as follows: The Overall Picture: more needs to be understood about the process of acculturation of indigenous communi...
Productions domestiques, productions spécialisées… et le reste ? Les différents types de productions céramiques néolithiques
Productions domestiques, productions spécialisées… et le reste ? Les différents types de productions céramiques néolithiques
The bibliography linked to the production specialization is very huge. Numerous methods of analysis and interpretations were proposed, but they do not still adapt to the specificit...
Neolithic ceramic spoons – indicators of dietary distinctiveness in the eastern Adriatic Neolithic?
Neolithic ceramic spoons – indicators of dietary distinctiveness in the eastern Adriatic Neolithic?
Among the rich and diverse archaeological finds collected at more than fifty known Neolithic sites in the entire area of the eastern Adriatic and its hinterland, ceramic spoons com...
Dwellings of the Elshan Early Neolithic culture
Dwellings of the Elshan Early Neolithic culture
Dwelling is the most important source, revealing the details of social structure, economy, technical traditions and is of key importance for understanding society. Only a limited n...
Mõtestades materiaalset kultuuri / Making sense of the material culture
Mõtestades materiaalset kultuuri / Making sense of the material culture
People live amidst objects, things, articles, items, artefacts, materials, substances, and stuff – described in social sciences and humanities as material culture, which denotes bo...
Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Ancient Settlement Sites in Shandong Province Since the Neolithic Period
Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics of Ancient Settlement Sites in Shandong Province Since the Neolithic Period
Using ArcGIS10.2, a spatial database was constructed for 8.5-2.2 ka historical and cultural sites in Shandong Province. Using a combination of statistical and superposition analysi...

