Javascript must be enabled to continue!
THE GOBUSTAN NEOLITHIC CULTURE
View through CrossRef
Based on the study of concrete material, the paper proposes to introduce a new Neolithic archaeological culture in the Caucasus – the Gobustan culture. As the basis for a detailed typological analysis, the author examined numerous collections of stone tools, uncovered from the cultural layers of the Anazaga site. Although known since 1965, these materials have not been the subject of any monographic publication until now. The proposed study considers these collections in the context of synchronous sites of the region and in more broad terms – in the cultural area, which includes Neolithic industries of the studied type. The main typological basis for the identification of the Gobustan Neolithic culture is the type of tools, which is defined by the author as the Uytash point. In functional terms, this item is a peculiar flint arrowhead. The geography of this cultural-defining type includes the area of the Caspian Sea coasts, at least from Gobustan to the place of narrowing of the Caspian lowland on the Dagestan coast in the vicinity of modern Makhachkala. In view of the ambiguity and incompleteness of publications of data on radiocarbon analysis, the chronological framework of the Gobustan culture at the moment has to be discussed using only the concepts of relative age. Based on the possibilities of comparative-typological dating, we suggest to consider the time of its functioning in the period of the 6th and probably the beginning of the 5th millennia BC, approximately synchronously with two other Neolithic cultures of the Eastern Caucasus – Shomutepe and Chokh. At the same time, the Gobustan culture radically differes from the last two not only in terms of material culture, but also in the life-support strategy, characteristic to its bearers.
Institute of History, Archeology and Ethnography
Title: THE GOBUSTAN NEOLITHIC CULTURE
Description:
Based on the study of concrete material, the paper proposes to introduce a new Neolithic archaeological culture in the Caucasus – the Gobustan culture.
As the basis for a detailed typological analysis, the author examined numerous collections of stone tools, uncovered from the cultural layers of the Anazaga site.
Although known since 1965, these materials have not been the subject of any monographic publication until now.
The proposed study considers these collections in the context of synchronous sites of the region and in more broad terms – in the cultural area, which includes Neolithic industries of the studied type.
The main typological basis for the identification of the Gobustan Neolithic culture is the type of tools, which is defined by the author as the Uytash point.
In functional terms, this item is a peculiar flint arrowhead.
The geography of this cultural-defining type includes the area of the Caspian Sea coasts, at least from Gobustan to the place of narrowing of the Caspian lowland on the Dagestan coast in the vicinity of modern Makhachkala.
In view of the ambiguity and incompleteness of publications of data on radiocarbon analysis, the chronological framework of the Gobustan culture at the moment has to be discussed using only the concepts of relative age.
Based on the possibilities of comparative-typological dating, we suggest to consider the time of its functioning in the period of the 6th and probably the beginning of the 5th millennia BC, approximately synchronously with two other Neolithic cultures of the Eastern Caucasus – Shomutepe and Chokh.
At the same time, the Gobustan culture radically differes from the last two not only in terms of material culture, but also in the life-support strategy, characteristic to its bearers.
Related Results
Mesolithic and Neolithic Culture of Gobustan
Mesolithic and Neolithic Culture of Gobustan
The Gobustan archaeological assemblage is one of the most important resources for studying the ancient history of Azerbaijan and the broader Caucasus. This collection of sites – co...
Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric
Response to the contribution: On Neolithic authenticity of finds from Belica by Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric
In the last issue of Starinar (LXII/2012) a contribution On Neolithic Authenticity of Finds from Belica was published. The authors Dragana Antonovic and Slavisa Peric (further A-P)...
Neolithic Complex Hunter-Gatherers in Korea Revisitied
Neolithic Complex Hunter-Gatherers in Korea Revisitied
The present essay critically reviews the recent attempt to conceptualize the Neolithic society in Korea as complex hunter-gatherers. While large scale settlements with 20 to 30, an...
Neolithic cave burials
Neolithic cave burials
The book studies Neolithic burial in Britain by focussing primarily on evidence from caves. It interprets human remains from 48 Neolithic caves and compares them to what we know of...
Writing Neolithic Britain: an interpretive journey
Writing Neolithic Britain: an interpretive journey
It is just over sixty years since Stuart Piggott published his major work, Neolithic Cultures of the British Isles. This was the first comprehensive account of what was then known ...
Permanent molar trait expression in the Late Neolithic cave burials of the Meuse Basin, Belgium
Permanent molar trait expression in the Late Neolithic cave burials of the Meuse Basin, Belgium
At least 250 cave burials along the Meuse river basin of Belgium yield prehistoric remains, and most date from the Late Neolithic period. Several have been radiocarbon dated, inclu...
Periodisation of the Neolithic and radiocarbon chronology of the Early Neolithic and the beginning of the Middle Neolithic in Finland
Periodisation of the Neolithic and radiocarbon chronology of the Early Neolithic and the beginning of the Middle Neolithic in Finland
This paper discusses the basis of Neolithic periodization used in mainland Finland. It is suggested that the periodization should be revised: boundary between the Middle and Late N...
The Future Neolithic
The Future Neolithic
As for Shakespeare, every generation gets the Neolithic it deserves. This chapter discusses emerging views of what the Neolithic is and how to study it, with the thesis that recent...

