Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Effectiveness of immunotherapy versus BRAF/MEK inhibitors in treatment-naïve BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma: A single institution retrospective analysis.
View through CrossRef
e21515 Background: Skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the US. Melanoma constitutes about 1% of all skin cancers, but it accounts for most of skin cancer related deaths. In 2017, 85,000 new cases of melanoma were reported while 8000 people died. BRAF is the gene encoding for B-Raf protein; a serine/threonine-protein kinase involved in cell growth and survival. Activating mutations in BRAF are present in approximately 50% of melanomas. Therapeutics in melanoma have been rapidly evolving. Currently, advanced melanoma with a mutation in the BRAF gene has two different modalities for first-line treatment; immunotherapy which mediates checkpoint inhibition versus targeted therapy with BRAF + MEK inhibitors. The aim of our study was to compare effectiveness of immunotherapy versus BRAF/MEK inhibitors as first line treatment for metastatic BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. Methods: A retrospective study of all patients aged ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with metastatic melanoma at our center between 1/1/2011 and 05/30/2021 was carried out. Patients who had BRAF negative melanoma or other active malignancies were excluded. Our primary endpoint was difference in overall survival and progression-free survival between two treatment groups. Secondary endpoint was to compare baseline characteristics associated with treatment options. Results: A total of 308 patients were diagnosed with advanced melanoma during the study period. N = 106 (34%) were found to have BRAF mutation. Of these, 88 (83%) received single-agent or combination immunotherapy while 18 (17%) received BRAF/MEK inhibitors. In immunotherapy group, 13 (14.7%) patients received combination immunotherapy while 75 (85%) got single agent treatment. 60 (56.6%) were males. Median age was 61 (89-21) years. Mean BMI at presentation was 29.5 ± 6.8 kg while mean LDH was 407 U/L. Mean age in immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitor group was 59.5 and 54.4 years, respectively. Differences between immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors groups were observed in duration (months) between initiation of treatment and progression of disease (10.3 vs 7.23), death at time of last follow-up (21% vs 63%), remission at time of last follow up (37% vs 16%), and progression at time of last follow up (38% vs 16%). At the time of analysis, the mean follow-up was 28 ± 23.7 months in the immunotherapy group and 24 ± 23.3 months in the BRAF/MEK inhibitor group. Overall, at a mean follow up of 27.3 ± 23.5 months, no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in unadjusted models in terms of overall survival (p 0.67) and progression free survival (p 0.16). Conclusions: Patients receiving first-line immunotherapy showed no significant survival benefit versus those receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. This contrasts with other studies showing survival benefits in patients receiving immunotherapy as first line agent.
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Title: Effectiveness of immunotherapy versus BRAF/MEK inhibitors in treatment-naïve BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma: A single institution retrospective analysis.
Description:
e21515 Background: Skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in the US.
Melanoma constitutes about 1% of all skin cancers, but it accounts for most of skin cancer related deaths.
In 2017, 85,000 new cases of melanoma were reported while 8000 people died.
BRAF is the gene encoding for B-Raf protein; a serine/threonine-protein kinase involved in cell growth and survival.
Activating mutations in BRAF are present in approximately 50% of melanomas.
Therapeutics in melanoma have been rapidly evolving.
Currently, advanced melanoma with a mutation in the BRAF gene has two different modalities for first-line treatment; immunotherapy which mediates checkpoint inhibition versus targeted therapy with BRAF + MEK inhibitors.
The aim of our study was to compare effectiveness of immunotherapy versus BRAF/MEK inhibitors as first line treatment for metastatic BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma.
Methods: A retrospective study of all patients aged ≥ 18 years, diagnosed with metastatic melanoma at our center between 1/1/2011 and 05/30/2021 was carried out.
Patients who had BRAF negative melanoma or other active malignancies were excluded.
Our primary endpoint was difference in overall survival and progression-free survival between two treatment groups.
Secondary endpoint was to compare baseline characteristics associated with treatment options.
Results: A total of 308 patients were diagnosed with advanced melanoma during the study period.
N = 106 (34%) were found to have BRAF mutation.
Of these, 88 (83%) received single-agent or combination immunotherapy while 18 (17%) received BRAF/MEK inhibitors.
In immunotherapy group, 13 (14.
7%) patients received combination immunotherapy while 75 (85%) got single agent treatment.
60 (56.
6%) were males.
Median age was 61 (89-21) years.
Mean BMI at presentation was 29.
5 ± 6.
8 kg while mean LDH was 407 U/L.
Mean age in immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitor group was 59.
5 and 54.
4 years, respectively.
Differences between immunotherapy and BRAF/MEK inhibitors groups were observed in duration (months) between initiation of treatment and progression of disease (10.
3 vs 7.
23), death at time of last follow-up (21% vs 63%), remission at time of last follow up (37% vs 16%), and progression at time of last follow up (38% vs 16%).
At the time of analysis, the mean follow-up was 28 ± 23.
7 months in the immunotherapy group and 24 ± 23.
3 months in the BRAF/MEK inhibitor group.
Overall, at a mean follow up of 27.
3 ± 23.
5 months, no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups in unadjusted models in terms of overall survival (p 0.
67) and progression free survival (p 0.
16).
Conclusions: Patients receiving first-line immunotherapy showed no significant survival benefit versus those receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy.
This contrasts with other studies showing survival benefits in patients receiving immunotherapy as first line agent.
Related Results
Real world characteristics and outcomes of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: The COALA project.
Real world characteristics and outcomes of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia: The COALA project.
70
Background:
BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) represents a unique molecular subset with poor prognosis and less ...
Data from The Novel ATP-Competitive MEK/Aurora Kinase Inhibitor BI-847325 Overcomes Acquired BRAF Inhibitor Resistance through Suppression of Mcl-1 and MEK Expression
Data from The Novel ATP-Competitive MEK/Aurora Kinase Inhibitor BI-847325 Overcomes Acquired BRAF Inhibitor Resistance through Suppression of Mcl-1 and MEK Expression
<div>Abstract<p>Resistance to BRAF inhibitors is a major clinical problem. Here, we evaluate BI-847325, an ATP-competitive inhibitor of MEK and Aurora kinases, in treat...
Data from The Novel ATP-Competitive MEK/Aurora Kinase Inhibitor BI-847325 Overcomes Acquired BRAF Inhibitor Resistance through Suppression of Mcl-1 and MEK Expression
Data from The Novel ATP-Competitive MEK/Aurora Kinase Inhibitor BI-847325 Overcomes Acquired BRAF Inhibitor Resistance through Suppression of Mcl-1 and MEK Expression
<div>Abstract<p>Resistance to BRAF inhibitors is a major clinical problem. Here, we evaluate BI-847325, an ATP-competitive inhibitor of MEK and Aurora kinases, in treat...
CRISPR/Cas9 Edited RAS & MEK Mutant Cells Acquire BRAF and MEK Inhibitor Resistance with MEK1 Q56P Restoring Sensitivity to MEK/BRAF Inhibitor Combo and KRAS G13D Gaining Sensitivity to Immunotherapy
CRISPR/Cas9 Edited RAS & MEK Mutant Cells Acquire BRAF and MEK Inhibitor Resistance with MEK1 Q56P Restoring Sensitivity to MEK/BRAF Inhibitor Combo and KRAS G13D Gaining Sensitivity to Immunotherapy
BRAF V600E mutation drives uncontrolled cell growth in most melanomas. While BRAF V600E tumors are initially responsive to BRAF inhibitors, prolonged treatment results in inhibitor...
Abstract 6979: Uncovering the BRAF interactome to identify novel therapeutic targets for BRAF driven melanoma and lung cancer
Abstract 6979: Uncovering the BRAF interactome to identify novel therapeutic targets for BRAF driven melanoma and lung cancer
Abstract
BRAF protein kinases act downstream of RAS-GTP and upstream of MEK>ERK MAP Kinase signaling. Notably, mutational activation of BRAF is a driver of ap...
Abstract 1209: FGFR inhibition re-sensitizes BRAF/MEK dual resistant cells to the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination
Abstract 1209: FGFR inhibition re-sensitizes BRAF/MEK dual resistant cells to the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination
Abstract
The BRAF-MEK pathway is frequently mutated in human melanoma. Inhibitors of these kinases have proven to prolong survival in melanoma patients. However, cli...
Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition with Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition with Vemurafenib and Cobimetinib for Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Acquired resistance is the most common cause of BRAF inhibitor monotherapy treatment failure, with the majority of patients experiencing disease progression with a median progressi...
Abstract 4229: ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2/BCRP inhibition sensitizes CD133+ cells to MEK/BRAF inhibitors
Abstract 4229: ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2/BCRP inhibition sensitizes CD133+ cells to MEK/BRAF inhibitors
Abstract
Melanoma is a highly aggressive type of skin cancer. Melanoma-initiating cells (MIC) have self-renewal capacity, are highly tumorigenic and have been identi...

