Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Safety of remimazolam in comparison with midazolam for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Background Remimazolam is an ester-based ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that efficiently achieves sedation within a short period and is now being assessed as a suitable alternative to midazolam. This meta-analysis aims to pool the available data assessing and focusing on the safety aspect of remimazolam compared with midazolam. Methods A multi-center randomized control trial for patients undergoing endoscopic procedures like colonoscopy was conducted, comparing remimazolam to placebo for the midazolam group as the intervention group. The safety of remimazolam was the primary endpoint of this meta-analysis. Results A total of 3 studies were included. The total study population was 697, including the placebo, remimazolam, and midazolam groups. The types of studies included are i. randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled clinical trial ii. prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing remimazolam to placebo (blindly), RCT, and iii. prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study RCT.; Treatment-emergent adverse effects included vascular disorders (P=0.42), cardiac disorders (p=0.06), respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (p=0.26), infections and infestations (0.88), hematologic abnormalities such as anemia (p=0.63), and derangements in Blood pressure (systolic p=0.47 and diastolic p=0.68 and respiratory parameters (p=0.34). Analysis of the reported data suggests that the remimazolam group had a significantly higher incidence of treatment-emergent adverse effects compared to the midazolam group (RR: 0.84; 95% CI [0.78, 0.91]; P <0.00001; I2 = 5%). Conclusions In conclusion, this meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials showed outcomes favoring both remimazolam and midazolam as successful sedatives, yet the higher requirement of top-up dosage and rescue sedatives in the midazolam group indicates that remimazolam can be used as its replacement, especially in colonoscopy procedures.
Title: Safety of remimazolam in comparison with midazolam for colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
Background Remimazolam is an ester-based ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that efficiently achieves sedation within a short period and is now being assessed as a suitable alternative to midazolam.
This meta-analysis aims to pool the available data assessing and focusing on the safety aspect of remimazolam compared with midazolam.
Methods A multi-center randomized control trial for patients undergoing endoscopic procedures like colonoscopy was conducted, comparing remimazolam to placebo for the midazolam group as the intervention group.
The safety of remimazolam was the primary endpoint of this meta-analysis.
Results A total of 3 studies were included.
The total study population was 697, including the placebo, remimazolam, and midazolam groups.
The types of studies included are i.
randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled clinical trial ii.
prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing remimazolam to placebo (blindly), RCT, and iii.
prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study RCT.
; Treatment-emergent adverse effects included vascular disorders (P=0.
42), cardiac disorders (p=0.
06), respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (p=0.
26), infections and infestations (0.
88), hematologic abnormalities such as anemia (p=0.
63), and derangements in Blood pressure (systolic p=0.
47 and diastolic p=0.
68 and respiratory parameters (p=0.
34).
Analysis of the reported data suggests that the remimazolam group had a significantly higher incidence of treatment-emergent adverse effects compared to the midazolam group (RR: 0.
84; 95% CI [0.
78, 0.
91]; P <0.
00001; I2 = 5%).
Conclusions In conclusion, this meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials showed outcomes favoring both remimazolam and midazolam as successful sedatives, yet the higher requirement of top-up dosage and rescue sedatives in the midazolam group indicates that remimazolam can be used as its replacement, especially in colonoscopy procedures.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Anesthetic Management Using Remimazolam in a Hemodialysis Patient
Anesthetic Management Using Remimazolam in a Hemodialysis Patient
Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, is a new intravenous anesthetic used for sedation and general anesthesia. Because remimazolam is primarily metabolized by carboxy...
The Impact of Midazolam on Reducing Adverse Events during Bronchoscopy Procedures
The Impact of Midazolam on Reducing Adverse Events during Bronchoscopy Procedures
Background: Bronchoscopy involves the examination of patient airways by advancing a bronchoscope into the lungs. This procedure is essential for diagnosing and treating respiratory...
Real‐World Evaluation of Remimazolam for Sedation During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors
Real‐World Evaluation of Remimazolam for Sedation During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors
ABSTRACT
Background and Aim
Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine receptor agonist intravenous anesthetic. This study aimed to ...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
Background: Various intrathecal additives are added to local anesthetics to increase the speed of onset, improve the quality, and prolong the
inuence of spinal anesthesia. Midazol...
Interactive Distraction Techniques Versus Midazolam in Anxiolysis In Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Interactive Distraction Techniques Versus Midazolam in Anxiolysis In Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Many pediatric patients experience high levels of anxiety prior to undergoing surgery. Midazolam is currently one of the most commonly used sedative drugs in the pediat...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Effects of different doses of remimazolam on the quality of sedation and cardiac function in elderly patients: a double-blind randomised controlled study
Effects of different doses of remimazolam on the quality of sedation and cardiac function in elderly patients: a double-blind randomised controlled study
BackgroundWe intended to observe the effects of different doses of remimazolam besylate via intravenous induction on the quality of sedation and cardiac function in elderly patient...

