Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic resin and resin modified glass ionomer cement on bonding of metal and ceramic brackets

View through CrossRef
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement on bonding of metal and ceramic brackets. Material and methods: Forty bovine teeth were sectioned and embedded into PVC with chemically-cured acrylic resin. The labial surfaces were flattened and received prophylaxis with pumice and water. Then they were divided into four groups, according to the bonding material and the type of bracket. Group 1: metallic bracket + Transbond XT; Group 2: metallic bracket + Vitremer; Group 3: ceramic bracket + Transbond XT; Group 4: ceramic bracket + Vitremer. The bonding was performed according to the manufacturers’ recommendations. The shear bond strength test was conducted in a universal testing machine (TIRAtest 2420) at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Then, the fractured surfaces were evaluated using a stereomicroscope (x15 magnification) to check the adhesive remnant index. Data was subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05). Results: The results suggested a non-significant effect of the interaction (p > 0.97), and only main factors were significant (p = 0.0001). The bond strength of Transbond XT was statistically higher than Vitremer. Ceramic brackets obtained the highest values of resistance when compared with metal brackets. Conclusion: The ceramic brackets bonded with Transbond XT orthodontic resin have excellent bond strength results.
Title: Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic resin and resin modified glass ionomer cement on bonding of metal and ceramic brackets
Description:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic resin and resin-modified glass ionomer cement on bonding of metal and ceramic brackets.
Material and methods: Forty bovine teeth were sectioned and embedded into PVC with chemically-cured acrylic resin.
The labial surfaces were flattened and received prophylaxis with pumice and water.
Then they were divided into four groups, according to the bonding material and the type of bracket.
Group 1: metallic bracket + Transbond XT; Group 2: metallic bracket + Vitremer; Group 3: ceramic bracket + Transbond XT; Group 4: ceramic bracket + Vitremer.
The bonding was performed according to the manufacturers’ recommendations.
The shear bond strength test was conducted in a universal testing machine (TIRAtest 2420) at a crosshead speed of 0.
5 mm/min.
Then, the fractured surfaces were evaluated using a stereomicroscope (x15 magnification) to check the adhesive remnant index.
Data was subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for pairwise comparisons (α = 0.
05).
Results: The results suggested a non-significant effect of the interaction (p > 0.
97), and only main factors were significant (p = 0.
0001).
The bond strength of Transbond XT was statistically higher than Vitremer.
Ceramic brackets obtained the highest values of resistance when compared with metal brackets.
Conclusion: The ceramic brackets bonded with Transbond XT orthodontic resin have excellent bond strength results.

Related Results

A Bond Strength Study of Luted Castable Ceramic Restorations
A Bond Strength Study of Luted Castable Ceramic Restorations
Accurate intra coronal castings can be produced using a castable ceramic-DICOR®-for which there is a need to identify a suitable luting cement. The aim of this investigation was to...
An in Vitro Comparison of The Shear Bond Strength of Human Teeth to Bovine Teeth in The Bonding Orthodontic Brackets
An in Vitro Comparison of The Shear Bond Strength of Human Teeth to Bovine Teeth in The Bonding Orthodontic Brackets
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate bovine enamel as such an alternative. Methodology: Ten human premolars and ten bovine incisors were bonded with two types of brackets, metalli...
Variability in Cytotoxicity and Fluoride Release of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cements
Variability in Cytotoxicity and Fluoride Release of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cements
New-generation glass-ionomer cements contain resin to improve their restorative properties. These resin-modified glass-ionomer cements vary considerably in their chemistry, which c...
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study
This study compares the strength of the native bone-cement bond and the old-new cement bond under cyclic loading, using third generation cementing technique, rasping and contaminat...
Effect of Ceramic Surface Treatment and Adhesive Systems on Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets
Effect of Ceramic Surface Treatment and Adhesive Systems on Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets
Objective. This study evaluated the effect of ceramic surface treatments on bond strength of metal brackets to machinable ceramics and veneering porcelain using different adhesive ...
On the study of polyurethane Ionomer—Part I
On the study of polyurethane Ionomer—Part I
AbstractThe reaction of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) with dimethylol propionic acid (DMPA) or diaminopentane sulphonic acid sodium salt (ES‐200) and other additives to form the struc...
Improvement of Seismic Performance of Ordinary Reinforced Partially Grouted Concrete Masonry Shear Walls
Improvement of Seismic Performance of Ordinary Reinforced Partially Grouted Concrete Masonry Shear Walls
Reinforced masonry constitutes about 10% of all low-rise construction in the US. Most of these structures are commercial and school buildings. It may also be used for multi-story h...
FLY ASH FOUNDATION REINFORCED BY CEMENT–SOIL MIXING PILES
FLY ASH FOUNDATION REINFORCED BY CEMENT–SOIL MIXING PILES
Cement-soil mixing piles have been commonly used to enhance the bearing capacity of fly ash stratum and mitigate the settlement damage to the surrounding environment. However, only...

Back to Top