Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Flexible NGL Recovery Process for Shale Gas Production
View through CrossRef
Shale gas characteristics and operation are different than conventional gas. A shale gas plant is typically smaller in capacity ranging from as low as 15 MMSCFD to the typical 200 MMSCFD cryogenic train size. The main challenges are the unpredictable gas compositions and flow rates during the development stage, which makes liquid recovery difficult. These uncertainties are challenges for a traditional cryogenic plant which is designed for a specific range of feed gas flow and compositions.
Shale gas compositions are richer in hydrocarbon liquids with ethane plus content ranging from 6 to 10+ GPM. Ethane is a valuable feedstock for petrochemical production, but ethane prices are unattractive in today’s environment. Most gas plants are operating in ethane rejection, resulting in a loss of propane revenue. To maintain propane recovery during ethane rejection, the refrigerated reflux category of NGL recovery technologies (e.g. Fluor’s Deep Dewpointing Process, DDP) has been developed to fully reject ethane while recovering 95% plus propane. The typical refrigerated reflux process is a refrigerated, non-expander process that can be turned down to as low as 4:1. The process can be operated in ethane recovery with minimal changes to the process to recover up to 60% ethane. The DDP process can also be enhanced to recover 95% ethane with additional compression. This technology has been proven in successfully operation in several installations.
Presently, Fluor and Joule Processing are leveraging the versatility of the refrigerated reflux process by productizing the proven and patented DDPSM version of this technology in the form of an "equipment kit". These equipment kits will offer a relatively small modular footprint to reduce installed cost and accelerated factory lead-time to shorten the overall EPC schedule.
This paper discusses the design, costs and economics of the DDP process for a typical shale gas plant, and the methodology to switch from propane recovery to 60% ethane recovery during normal operation, and to high ethane recovery with the bolt-on design. Key design challenges from an operating DDP unit are also detailed.
Title: A Flexible NGL Recovery Process for Shale Gas Production
Description:
Shale gas characteristics and operation are different than conventional gas.
A shale gas plant is typically smaller in capacity ranging from as low as 15 MMSCFD to the typical 200 MMSCFD cryogenic train size.
The main challenges are the unpredictable gas compositions and flow rates during the development stage, which makes liquid recovery difficult.
These uncertainties are challenges for a traditional cryogenic plant which is designed for a specific range of feed gas flow and compositions.
Shale gas compositions are richer in hydrocarbon liquids with ethane plus content ranging from 6 to 10+ GPM.
Ethane is a valuable feedstock for petrochemical production, but ethane prices are unattractive in today’s environment.
Most gas plants are operating in ethane rejection, resulting in a loss of propane revenue.
To maintain propane recovery during ethane rejection, the refrigerated reflux category of NGL recovery technologies (e.
g.
Fluor’s Deep Dewpointing Process, DDP) has been developed to fully reject ethane while recovering 95% plus propane.
The typical refrigerated reflux process is a refrigerated, non-expander process that can be turned down to as low as 4:1.
The process can be operated in ethane recovery with minimal changes to the process to recover up to 60% ethane.
The DDP process can also be enhanced to recover 95% ethane with additional compression.
This technology has been proven in successfully operation in several installations.
Presently, Fluor and Joule Processing are leveraging the versatility of the refrigerated reflux process by productizing the proven and patented DDPSM version of this technology in the form of an "equipment kit".
These equipment kits will offer a relatively small modular footprint to reduce installed cost and accelerated factory lead-time to shorten the overall EPC schedule.
This paper discusses the design, costs and economics of the DDP process for a typical shale gas plant, and the methodology to switch from propane recovery to 60% ethane recovery during normal operation, and to high ethane recovery with the bolt-on design.
Key design challenges from an operating DDP unit are also detailed.
Related Results
An Emerging CO2 Storage Option: CO2 Storage and By-Product Oil Recovery from Shale Oil Formations
An Emerging CO2 Storage Option: CO2 Storage and By-Product Oil Recovery from Shale Oil Formations
Recent studies, sponsored by the United States Energy Association (USEA) and prepared by Advanced Resources International, have identified an emerging CO2 storage option – injectin...
EffectiveFracturing Technology of Normal Pressure Shale Gas Wells
EffectiveFracturing Technology of Normal Pressure Shale Gas Wells
ABSTRACT
There is abundant normal pressure shale gas resource in China. However, it is hard to acquire commercial breakthroughs because of the relative low initia...
Cyclic Miscible Stimulation Doubles Estimated Ultimate Recovery from Mature Shale Wells
Cyclic Miscible Stimulation Doubles Estimated Ultimate Recovery from Mature Shale Wells
Abstract
Application of Enhanced Oil Recovery methods in shale has met limited commercial success to date. The target for improved recovery is huge with typical p...
Reservoir Modeling and Production Evaluation in Shale-Gas Reservoirs
Reservoir Modeling and Production Evaluation in Shale-Gas Reservoirs
Abstract
This paper examines issues with forecasting and evaluating production from unconventional gas reservoirs, such as the Barnett Shale. How can reservoirs b...
Hawiyah NGL Recovery Project: Operational Considerations during Project Design
Hawiyah NGL Recovery Project: Operational Considerations during Project Design
ABSTRACT
Saudi Aramco new NGL Recovery Project has been managed by an integrated team from project managements and proponent. Project management team members have...
Microscale Mechanical Anisotropy of Shale
Microscale Mechanical Anisotropy of Shale
ABSTRACT:
The hydrocarbon production in the United States, which was dominated by vertical drilling methods, underwent a shift towards combining horizontal and hy...
Two Superior Shale Oil Enhanced Recovery Methods for the Utica Shale
Two Superior Shale Oil Enhanced Recovery Methods for the Utica Shale
Abstract
The Utica Shale is a very large, important oil and gas resource in the eastern United States. While gas production dominates, oil production from horizontal...
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Comparisons of Pore Structure for Unconventional Tight Gas, Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas Reservoirs
Extended abstract
Tight sands gas, coalbed methane and shale gas are three kinds of typical unconventional natural gas. With the decrease of conventional oil and gas...

